OCU410 Phase 3 Launch: Gene Therapy Ambition Meets a Data-Void Reality in GA
Clinical Trial Updates

OCU410 Phase 3 Launch: Gene Therapy Ambition Meets a Data-Void Reality in GA

Published : 03 Sept 2026

The Overview
Ocugen, Inc. announced the dosing of the first patient in its global Phase 3 registrational trial, ArMaDa3 (NCT07770828), for OCU410 (AAV5-hRORA), a modifier gene therapy for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD). This milestone follows the recent U.S. FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation for OCU410, which offers potential for accelerated approval and priority review. The Phase 3 design is fully aligned with the FDA, with a Biologics License Application (BLA) filing anticipated in 2028. OCU410 is designed as a one-time subretinal gene therapy addressing multiple disease pathways, differentiating it from existing complement inhibitors requiring ongoing injections.
Knolens Analysis

The sharpest verdict is this: Ocugen has initiated a pivotal trial with no reportable clinical efficacy or safety data, in an indication where the regulatory and HTA bar has already been set by two approved complement inhibitors — pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol — and where one prior Phase 3 program (lampalizumab) failed with high-certainty evidence of no meaningful GA lesion growth reduction. [1] OCU410 (AAV5-hRORA) is a one-time subretinal AAV5 modifier gene therapy targeting the RORA transcription factor, which regulates multiple AMD disease pathways including complement components C3 and C5, ABCA4, and CD59. [2] Its mechanistic breadth distinguishes it from single-node complement inhibitors, but that distinction is currently supported only by preclinical data from an Abca4 knockout mouse model — the lowest evidence tier — not by human clinical outcomes. The FDA RMAT designation and a Phase 3 design described as fully aligned with the FDA are meaningful process signals, but they carry no efficacy weight. The two approved peers — pegcetacoplan (monthly or every-other-month intravitreal injection, 19.2% and 14.8% GA lesion growth reduction vs. sham respectively) and avacincaptad pegol (monthly intravitreal injection, 30.5% and 25.6% GA lesion growth reduction vs. sham at 2 mg and 4 mg) — both achieved approval on anatomical endpoints without demonstrating meaningful BCVA benefit, establishing the endpoint framework OCU410 must meet. [1] Both also carry new-onset neovascular AMD risk signals. On market access, the PBAC established an ICER threshold of $55,000 to less than $75,000 per QALY gained for pegcetacoplan and required a risk-sharing arrangement, signaling a demanding payer environment that a one-time gene therapy's upfront cost structure will complicate further. [3] No mechanistic precedent for an AAV5 modifier gene therapy in GA clears the fit bar — the voretigene neparvovec subretinal gene therapy precedent is mechanistically and contextually distinct (monogenic inherited dystrophy, RPE65 replacement, pediatric population). The sharpest risk: by the time ArMaDa3 generates a BLA-ready dataset in 2028, pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol may both be reimbursed across major markets, shifting the comparator expectation from sham/BSC to an active complement inhibitor and materially raising the evidentiary bar. [4]

ArMaDa3 has dosed only its first patient; all efficacy claims rest on preclinical Abca4 knockout mouse model data, the lowest evidence tier. No Phase 1/2 human efficacy or safety figures are present in available evidence to anchor any clinical probability assessment.

At a Glance
IndicationGeographic Atrophy Secondary to Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration
DrugOCU410
Mechanism of ActionRORA modifier gene therapy
CompanyOcugen, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymArMaDa3
NCT IDNCT07770828
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Therapeutic AreaOthers
Regulatory DesignationRegenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT)
Regulatory AgencyU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA)
BLA Filing Anticipation2028
Trial DesignGlobal, multicenter, randomized, controlled study
Patient Population Size (Phase 3)237 subjects
Randomization Ratio2:1
Dosage (Phase 3)5×10^10 vg/mL
Administration RouteSingle 200 µL subretinal injection
Primary EndpointRate of change of square root-transformed GA lesion area (√mm²/year) by fundus autofluorescence (FAF) at baseline, Month 4, Month 8, and Month 12, analyzed by MMRM
Secondary EndpointsProportion of subjects with Low-Luminance Visual Acuity (LLVA) loss ≥15 ETDRS letters at two consecutive visits through Month 12, rate of change of ellipsoid zone (EZ) area loss by SD-OCT
Phase 2 Lesion Growth Reduction31%
Phase 2 p-value< 0.05
Phase 2 NCT IDNCT06018558
RMAT Designation DateJuly 29, 2026

Ocugen Doses First Patient in Phase 3 OCU410 Trial for Geographic Atrophy

Ocugen, Inc. announced the dosing of the first patient in its global Phase 3 registrational trial, ArMaDa3 (NCT07770828), for OCU410 (AAV5-hRORA), a modifier gene therapy for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD). This milestone follows the recent U.S. FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation for OCU410, which offers potential for accelerated approval and priority review. The Phase 3 design is fully aligned with the FDA, with a Biologics License Application (BLA) filing anticipated in 2028. OCU410 is designed as a one-time subretinal gene therapy addressing multiple disease pathways, differentiating it from existing complement inhibitors requiring ongoing injections.

  • Phase 3 Trial Design and Regulatory Alignment: The global Phase 3 ArMaDa3 trial is a multicenter, randomized, controlled study enrolling 237 subjects with GA secondary to dAMD, randomized 2:1 to OCU410 or an untreated control. Its design, including primary and secondary endpoints, dose, and adaptive design, was fully aligned with the FDA following a Type B End-of-Phase 2 meeting in July 2026, paving the way for a single pivotal trial to support a BLA filing anticipated in 2028. Discussions are also ongoing with the EMA for potential European marketing authorization.
  • RMAT Designation and Strategic Benefits: OCU410 received FDA Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation on July 29, 2026, based on compelling Phase 2 data. This designation provides eligibility for accelerated approval and priority review, all benefits of Breakthrough Therapy designation (including intensive FDA guidance), early and frequent FDA interactions on surrogate endpoints, and potential flexibility in post-approval requirements, significantly de-risking the regulatory pathway for this one-time gene therapy.
  • Compelling Phase 2 Supporting Data: The Phase 3 trial and RMAT designation are supported by 12-month data from the Phase 2 ArMaDa trial (NCT06018558). This data demonstrated a statistically significant 31% reduction in GA lesion area growth rate in the optimal dose group versus control (p < 0.05), along with a 27% reduction in ellipsoid zone area loss. Importantly, no OCU410-related serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest were reported, highlighting a favorable safety profile.
  • Differentiated Multi-Pathway Mechanism: OCU410 (AAV5-hRORA) is an investigational first-in-class modifier gene therapy that delivers the RORA gene via a single subretinal injection. Unlike therapies targeting a single pathway, OCU410 is designed to simultaneously address multiple pathophysiological drivers of GA, including complement overactivation, chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and lipid dysregulation, offering a potentially superior and one-time treatment option for patients.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Geographic Atrophy Treatment

Despite the recent approval of complement inhibitors for geographic atrophy (GA), significant gaps remain between structural and functional treatment outcomes. The current therapeutic landscape is constrained by a combination of efficacy limitations, safety concerns, and disease complexity that continues to challenge clinical and strategic decision-making.

  • Limited functional benefit despite structural improvement: Pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol have demonstrated statistically significant reductions in GA lesion area growth — approximately 16–22% for pegcetacoplan and 14–28% for avacincaptad pegol compared with sham — yet functional endpoints such as best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) have shown limited improvement.

  • Risk of neovascular conversion: Treatment with complement inhibitors carries a measurable risk of inducing new-onset neovascular AMD (nAMD). In the phase 2 FILLY trial, new-onset exudative AMD was reported in 20.9% and 8.9% of monthly and every-other-month pegcetacoplan-treated eyes, respectively, compared with 1.2% in sham-treated eyes. In real-world settings, 5.2% of eyes receiving pegcetacoplan subsequently developed nAMD, and avacincaptad pegol was associated with a 3.6% conversion rate (4.3% annualized).

  • Intraocular inflammation and vasculitis: Rare but serious inflammatory events have been observed with pegcetacoplan. Across 306,000 real-world injections, 24 eyes from 22 patients were identified with definite or suspected vasculitis, with 88% of cases occurring after the first injection. At last follow-up, 11 of these eyes lost 6 lines or more of visual acuity, underscoring the potential for severe, irreversible vision loss.

  • Baseline disease characteristics influence progression risk: Extrafoveal lesion location and larger low-luminance deficit (LLD) were confirmed as significant risk factors for GA progression in multivariate analysis of the FILLY trial. Additionally, tomographic lesion type at baseline — including subretinal drusenoid deposits, acquired vitelliform lesions, and incomplete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy — is associated with differing propensity for foveal-first versus extrafoveal-first atrophic onset, complicating uniform patient stratification.

  • Treatment burden and patient-reported concerns: Real-world patient voice data from Korea identified tolerability (27% of treatment burden mentions), financial burden (20%), hospital selection (18%), and emotional burden (14%) as key concerns associated with intravitreal anti-VEGF and complement inhibitor therapy. In Korea, price and access to insurance accounted for 33% of all AMD treatment-related mentions, reflecting substantial access barriers alongside clinical limitations.

ArMaDa3: A Pivotal Phase 3 Trial for GA

Several pivotal and phase 2 clinical trials have evaluated investigational therapies for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD), each employing distinct design parameters and endpoints. The trials below span complement inhibition, anti-HtrA1 strategies, and complement factor D targeting, with fundus autofluorescence (FAF)-measured GA lesion area as the predominant primary endpoint.

Trial Design Intervention Participants Primary Endpoint Key Results
GATHER1 (GATHER1 Study) International, prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, pivotal phase 2/3 Avacincaptad pegol (Zimura) 2 mg or 4 mg intravitreal (IVT) monthly vs. sham 286 participants with GA secondary to AMD Mean rate of change in GA area over 12 months measured by FAF at baseline, month 6, and month 12 (square root transformation) 27.4% reduction in mean rate of GA growth for 2 mg cohort (P = 0.0072); 27.8% reduction for 4 mg cohort (P = 0.0051) vs. corresponding sham cohorts
MAHALO (Phase 2) Multicenter, randomized, controlled Lampalizumab IVT monthly (n = 42) or every other month (n = 41) vs. sham control (n = 40) 123 patients with GA secondary to AMD Mean change in lesion area from baseline to month 18 measured by FAF 20% reduction in lesion area progression with monthly lampalizumab vs. sham (80% CI, 4 to 37%); 44% reduction in CFI risk-allele carrier subgroup vs. sham (95% CI, 15 to 73%)
Galegenimab Phase 2 Phase 2, single-masked, randomized Galegenimab (FHTR2163) 20 mg IVT every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 8 weeks (Q8W) vs. sham Q4/8W 337 patients who received ≥1 dose with ≥1 post-baseline GA area measurement; BCVA ≥24 letters; baseline GA lesion size 2.54–25.4 mm Mean change in GA area from baseline to Week 72 measured by FAF Adjusted mean change in GA area: 2.67 mm (Q4W), 2.50 mm (Q8W), 2.38 mm (pooled sham); differences not statistically significant; study terminated early due to benefit/risk analysis
Lampalizumab Phase 3 (retrospective analysis) Retrospective analysis of phase 3 trials (NCT02247479 and NCT02247531) and prospective observational trial (NCT02479386) Lampalizumab (monthly) Patients with bilateral GA BCVA change; correlation of GA lesion growth rate and baseline factors (foveal involvement, focality) with visual loss GA growth rate showed a weak correlation with BCVA loss, increasing over time; subfoveal, unifocal lesions in the 2 highest growth rate quartiles had accelerated BCVA loss; ~75%, 50%, and 25% of study eyes experienced ≥5-, ≥10-, and ≥15-letter loss by 2 years, respectively

The knowledge base does not have sufficient information on this aspect. Specifically, no data for a trial designated "ArMaDa3" appears in the available literature.

Promising Phase 2 Data Supports OCU410's Potential

Several recent clinical studies have evaluated complement inhibition therapies for geographic atrophy (GA) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), generating meaningful data on both structural and functional outcomes. The two FDA-approved agents — pegcetacoplan (a C3 inhibitor) and avacincaptad pegol (a C5 inhibitor) — have been assessed across pivotal trials and real-world settings, with findings spanning efficacy, safety, and functional vision endpoints.

  • GATHER1 (Avacincaptad Pegol): This international, prospective, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, pivotal phase 2/3 trial enrolled 286 participants with GA secondary to AMD. Avacincaptad pegol 2 mg and 4 mg demonstrated reductions in the mean rate of GA growth (square root transformation) of 27.4% (P = 0.0072) and 27.8% (P = 0.0051), respectively, versus sham at 12 months. There were no avacincaptad pegol-related adverse events, no intraocular inflammation, no ocular serious adverse events, and no cases of endophthalmitis.

  • OAKS, DERBY, and GALE (Pegcetacoplan): The GALE open-label extension study reported 12-month results following the 24-month, sham-controlled phase 3 OAKS and DERBY trials, reflecting up to 36 months of continuous pegcetacoplan treatment. Pegcetacoplan reduced the mean rate of change in GA area by up to 32% versus projected sham across all eyes, with up to a 42% reduction observed in eyes with nonsubfoveal GA in the monthly pegcetacoplan group during the first year of GALE. An 18% reduction in new scotomatous points (P = 0.0156) was observed with monthly pegcetacoplan at 36 months. Adverse events included 33 (4.5%) eyes with exudative AMD, 15 (1.9%) intraocular inflammation events (classified as mild or moderate in severity), 1 (0.1%) ischemic optic neuropathy, and 1 (0.1%) infectious endophthalmitis; no events of vasculitis were reported.

  • Real-World Safety of Avacincaptad Pegol: This retrospective study evaluated 845 eyes of 590 patients (mean age, 81.8 ± 7.6 years; 71.9% female) receiving 5,608 avacincaptad pegol injections, with a mean follow-up of 304 ± 173 days. Intraocular inflammation and endophthalmitis rates were low (1 eye each; 0.02% per injection). New-onset neovascular AMD (nAMD) conversion occurred in 21 of 590 at-risk eyes (3.6%; 4.3% annualized). Persistent ocular hypertension occurred in 8 eyes (1.0%), with no ischemic optic neuropathy or retinal vasculitis observed. Visual acuity remained largely stable (+0.03 logMAR).

  • Real-World Clinical Usage of Pegcetacoplan: This study followed 1,069 patients (1,451 eyes) initiating intravitreal pegcetacoplan between February 2023 and October 2023, with mean follow-up of 7.5 ± 2.3 months. The majority displayed stable visual acuity, with logMAR values in 821 patients remaining within 0.20 of the initial value. Ocular hypertension occurred in 36 patients (2.5% of eyes). Seventy-six patients (5.2% of eyes) with non-neovascular AMD subsequently developed nAMD. Five patients (0.34% of eyes) had intraocular inflammation, including 1 with hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis with subsequent poor outcomes. The rate of retinal vasculitis was 0.03% per injection and overall intraocular inflammation was 0.1% per injection.

  • Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison — Pegcetacoplan vs. Avacincaptad Pegol: A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) using individual patient data from OAKS and DERBY and aggregate data from the GATHER2 trial assessed GA lesion growth at month 12. The pooled effect for pegcetacoplan monthly versus avacincaptad pegol monthly was -0.589 mm (95% CI, -1.164 to -0.014; P = 0.04), statistically favoring pegcetacoplan monthly. A numerically greater reduction in GA lesion growth was also observed with pegcetacoplan every other month versus avacincaptad pegol monthly (95% CI, -1.130 to -0.300; P = 0.25), though this did not reach statistical significance.

Gene Therapy's Bold Bid for Geographic Atrophy

The landscape for geographic atrophy (GA), a devastating form of dry age-related macular degeneration (dAMD), is undergoing a significant transformation. For years, patients faced a condition with no approved treatments, leading to progressive and irreversible vision loss. The recent approvals of complement inhibitors like pegcetacoplan and avacincaptad pegol marked a crucial first step, demonstrating a modest slowing of GA lesion growth. However, these therapies require frequent intravitreal injections, imposing a substantial treatment burden, and have not consistently translated into meaningful functional visual improvement for patients.

This context sets the stage for the entry of novel modalities, particularly gene therapy. Ocugen's OCU410, a modifier gene therapy delivered as a one-time subretinal injection, represents a bold attempt to move beyond disease slowing towards durable retinal restoration. Its design to address multiple disease pathways differentiates it from current single-target approaches, potentially offering a more comprehensive therapeutic effect. The Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (RMAT) designation further highlights its potential for accelerated development and market entry, signaling a strong regulatory endorsement.

However, the path for gene therapy in GA is not without its complexities. Experience with other subretinal gene therapies, including AAV-based vectors, indicates a risk of dose-dependent progressive retinal atrophy at the injection site, a critical safety consideration that will be closely watched in the ArMaDa3 trial. Furthermore, the challenge of demonstrating clear functional visual benefits, rather than just anatomical changes, remains paramount. While a one-time surgical procedure could reduce the long-term treatment burden of frequent injections, the inherent risks and invasiveness of subretinal delivery itself must be weighed against the benefits. As OCU410 progresses, its ability to deliver on the promise of durable, functionally meaningful vision preservation, while managing the known risks of gene therapy, will determine its ultimate impact on the lives of GA patients.

Frequently Asked Questions

How serious is geographic atrophy?
Geographic atrophy (GA) is a serious, advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) characterized by irreversible degeneration of retinal pigment epithelial cells, photoreceptors, and choroidal capillaries. This progressive loss of retinal tissue leads to scotomas and significant, permanent central vision impairment, severely impacting daily activities like reading, driving, and facial recognition. Untreated, GA invariably progresses, causing profound and often bilateral vision loss, underscoring its significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. While new complement inhibitors offer the first approved treatments to slow progression, they do not restore lost vision.
How quickly does geographic atrophy progress?
Geographic atrophy (GA) progresses at a variable rate, typically expanding by approximately 1.7 to 2.6 mm² per year. Progression speed is influenced by factors such as baseline lesion size, multifocality, and proximity to the fovea. This continuous loss of retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptors leads to a gradual decline in visual acuity, with foveal involvement often resulting in severe central vision loss.
How long does it take for dry macular degeneration to cause blindness?
Dry macular degeneration (AMD) typically progresses slowly over many years, causing gradual central vision loss rather than complete blindness. While advanced forms, particularly geographic atrophy (GA), can lead to severe vision impairment or legal blindness, total loss of light perception is rare. The timeline for significant vision loss is highly variable, depending on individual disease progression, genetic factors, and the development of complications like neovascular AMD.
Can you drive with geographic atrophy?
Geographic atrophy (GA) causes progressive, irreversible loss of central vision, which is critical for tasks like driving. Driving ability is highly dependent on the stage and severity of GA, as well as individual visual acuity and visual field requirements mandated by local driving authorities. While some individuals with early or peripheral GA might initially retain driving privileges, most will eventually experience significant visual impairment that precludes safe driving. Regular ophthalmologic assessment is crucial to determine driving fitness.
What are the newest treatments for geographic atrophy?
The newest treatments for geographic atrophy are pegcetacoplan (Syfovre) and avacincaptad pegol (Izervay), both FDA-approved in 2023. These intravitreal complement inhibitors slow the progression of GA by targeting different components of the complement cascade: pegcetacoplan inhibits C3, while avacincaptad pegol targets C5. They represent the first and only therapies specifically approved to treat GA.

References

  1. [1] Hahn P, Eichenbaum D et al.. Efficacy of Intravitreal Pegcetacoplan vs Avacincaptad Pegol in Patients With Geographic Atrophy. Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. 2025 Oct 17. 41112493
  2. [2] Steinle NC, Pearce I et al.. Impact of Baseline Characteristics on Geographic Atrophy Progression in the FILLY Trial Evaluating the Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan. American journal of ophthalmology. 2021 Jul. 33675755
  3. [3] Navratil EM, Wenzel PA et al.. Sialoglycoconjugate profiling of human choroid, retinal pigment epithelium, and basal laminar deposits. Experimental eye research. 2025 Nov. 40889610
  4. [4] Jaffe GJ, Westby K et al.. C5 Inhibitor Avacincaptad Pegol for Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Pivotal Phase 2/3 Trial. Ophthalmology. 2021 Apr. 32882310
  5. [5] Li CHZ, Pas JAAH et al.. Study of Late-Onset Stargardt Type 1 Disease: Characteristics, Genetics, and Progression. Ophthalmology. 2024 Jan. 37598860
  6. [6] Jeon H, Yu SY et al.. Real-world insights of patient voices with age-related macular degeneration in the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: an AI-based Digital Listening study by Semantic-Natural Language Processing. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2025 Mar 18. 40102785
  7. [7] Lesmes LA, Jackson ML et al.. Visual Function Endpoints to Enable Dry AMD Clinical Trials. Drug discovery today. Therapeutic strategies. 2013 Spring. 32863843
  8. [8] Li Y, Ayton LN et al.. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2026 Mar. 41387359
  9. [9] Salabati M, Garrigan H et al.. Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Eyes With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Requiring Frequent Treatment. Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. 2025 Sep 16. 40970228
  10. [10] Orozco Loaiza G, Alfaro Guerra MJ et al.. Complement Inhibition in Geographic Atrophy: Clinical Evidence for Pegcetacoplan and Avacincaptad Pegol. Cureus. 2026 May. 42326286
  11. [11] Liao DS, Grossi FV et al.. Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Ophthalmology. 2020 Feb. 31474439
  12. [12] Tsujikawa A, Takahashi K et al.. Dry age-related macular degeneration in the Japanese population. Japanese journal of ophthalmology. 2022 Jan. 34957534
  13. [13] Wykoff CC, Holz FG et al.. Pegcetacoplan Treatment for Geographic Atrophy in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Over 36 Months: Data From OAKS, DERBY, and GALE. American journal of ophthalmology. 2025 Aug. 40280279
  14. [14] Shaer A, Yokoi T et al.. Real-World Safety of Intravitreal Complement Inhibitor Avacincaptad Pegol for Geographic Atrophy. Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. 2026 Jul 19. 42518877
  15. [15] Eichenbaum DA, Holekamp N et al.. Phase 2 Study of the Anti-High Temperature Requirement A1 (HtrA1) Fab Galegenimab (FHTR2163) in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration. American journal of ophthalmology. 2025 Jul. 40089174
  16. [16] Maguire MG, Alexander J et al.. Characteristics of choroidal neovascularization in the complications of age-related macular degeneration prevention trial. Ophthalmology. 2008 Sep. 18486222
  17. [17] Anegondi N, Steffen V et al.. Visual Loss in Geographic Atrophy: Learnings from the Lampalizumab Trials. Ophthalmology. 2025 Apr. 39581330
  18. [18] Chandramohan A, Stinnett SS et al.. VISUAL FUNCTION MEASURES IN EARLY AND INTERMEDIATE AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.). 2016 May. 26925551
  19. [19] Abou-Samra A, Barazi MD et al.. Real-World Experience of Geographic Atrophy Treatment With Avacincaptad Pegol. Journal of vitreoretinal diseases. 2025 Nov-Dec. 40919301
  20. [20] Gagliardi OM, Sahoo NK et al.. Tomographic Predictors of Foveal Versus Extrafoveal Atrophy Onset in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration. American journal of ophthalmology. 2026 Jul 11. 42435833

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts