Nurix Therapeutics Announces First Patient Enrolled in Registrational Phase 3 DAYBreak CLL-306 Trial of Bexobrutideg
Clinical Trial Updates

Nurix Therapeutics Announces First Patient Enrolled in Registrational Phase 3 DAYBreak CLL-306 Trial of Bexobrutideg

Published : 05 Aug 2026

The Overview
Nurix Therapeutics announced the enrollment of the first patient in its global Phase 3 DAYBreak CLL-306 study (NCT07516093) for bexobrutideg. This registrational trial, conducted in collaboration with Roche, evaluates bexobrutideg, a potential best-in-class targeted protein degrader of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), in approximately 620 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who have previously progressed on a covalent BTK inhibitor. The study is designed as a head-to-head comparison to demonstrate the superiority of bexobrutideg (600 mg orally once daily) versus pirtobrutinib, the current standard of care. Dual primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee, aiming to support global regulatory submissions.
Knolens Analysis
At a Glance
IndicationRelapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL)
DrugBexobrutideg
Mechanism of ActionBruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) degrader
CompanyNurix Therapeutics, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymDAYBreak CLL-306
NCT IDNCT07516093
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Therapeutic AreaHematology
Comparator DrugPirtobrutinib
Dosage600 mg orally once per day
Patient Population SizeApproximately 620 patients
Primary EndpointsObjective Response Rate (ORR), Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Collaboration PartnerRoche
Patient SubpopulationRelapsed/refractory CLL/SLL patients previously treated with a covalent BTK inhibitor
Drug ClassTargeted Protein Degrader
Route of AdministrationOral

Nurix Enrolls First Patient in Registrational Phase 3 Bexobrutideg Trial

Nurix Therapeutics announced the enrollment of the first patient in its global Phase 3 DAYBreak CLL-306 study (NCT07516093) for bexobrutideg. This registrational trial, conducted in collaboration with Roche, evaluates bexobrutideg, a potential best-in-class targeted protein degrader of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), in approximately 620 patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) who have previously progressed on a covalent BTK inhibitor. The study is designed as a head-to-head comparison to demonstrate the superiority of bexobrutideg (600 mg orally once daily) versus pirtobrutinib, the current standard of care. Dual primary endpoints are objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), as assessed by an independent review committee, aiming to support global regulatory submissions.

  • The DAYBreak CLL-306 trial is a randomized Phase 3 study designed to establish the superiority of bexobrutideg, a targeted protein degrader, over pirtobrutinib, a non-covalent BTK inhibitor. This head-to-head comparison aims to redefine treatment for relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL patients by testing whether the differentiated approach of BTK degradation translates into superior outcomes, with dual primary endpoints of objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • The global study plans to enroll approximately 620 patients suffering from relapsed/refractory CLL/SLL who have previously progressed after covalent BTK inhibitor therapy. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either bexobrutideg at a dose of 600 mg orally once per day or pirtobrutinib, which is currently considered the standard of care in this specific treatment setting.
  • Bexobrutideg (NX-5948) is an investigational, orally bioavailable, brain-penetrant, and highly selective small-molecule degrader of BTK. Its advancement into a registrational Phase 3 trial, in collaboration with Roche, underscores Nurix's commitment to targeted protein degradation. This program aims to fully realize the potential of BTK degradation across multiple therapeutic areas, including oncology, immunology, and neurology, beyond this specific CLL/SLL indication.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL After BTKi Failure

Despite significant therapeutic advances with BTK and BCL2 inhibitors, a substantial unmet need persists for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). The emergence of resistance and subsequent treatment failure in heavily pre-treated populations, particularly those with high-risk disease characteristics, continues to pose a significant clinical challenge.

  • Double-Refractory/Exposed Patients: A critical unmet need is the population of patients who are "double-refractory" or "double-exposed," defined as having progressive disease after sequential or combined treatment with both a BTK inhibitor and a BCL2 inhibitor. These patients have a poor prognosis, with real-world evidence showing limited efficacy of subsequent therapies and a median overall survival of only 2.2 years in one cohort.

  • High-Risk Genetic Subgroups: Patients with high-risk genetic features continue to experience worse outcomes, even with novel agents. Key populations include those with TP53 abnormalities (del(17p) and/or mutation), unmutated IGHV, and complex karyotypes. These factors retain their prognostic impact, mandating risk-stratification and underscoring the need for therapies that can produce durable responses in these subgroups.

  • Acquired Resistance Mechanisms: Disease relapse is frequently driven by the substantial heterogeneity of CLL and the development of specific genetic resistance mechanisms. Following BTKi therapy, a high incidence of pathogenic variants is observed, including mutations in BTK (e.g., C481S, L528W, T474I), PLCG2, SF3B1, and genes within the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway, which contribute to treatment failure and complicate subsequent therapeutic choices.

  • Limitations of Current Regimens: Currently approved fixed-duration and continuous therapy regimens can fall short for patients at high risk of progression. This necessitates the development of novel agents and therapeutic strategies, such as next-generation BCL-2 and non-covalent BTK inhibitors, multi-drug combinations, and cellular therapies, which are being actively investigated in clinical trials to improve long-term disease control.

Bexobrutideg's Differentiated Approach in the BTK Inhibitor Landscape

The treatment paradigm for relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) has shifted decisively from chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) to pathway inhibitors (PIs), which include Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and BCL2 inhibitors. PIs have demonstrated superior efficacy over CIT in the R/R setting and can overcome the negative prognostic impact of biomarkers such as TP53 aberrations. The current therapeutic strategy involves sequential use of these novel agents. For R/R patients without prior novel therapy exposure, either a BTK or BCL2 inhibitor regimen is standard. Subsequently, for patients who progress on a BTK inhibitor, a BCL2 inhibitor is recommended, and vice versa. For the challenging "double refractory" population who have progressed on both classes of agents, enrollment in a clinical trial is strongly preferred. In the absence of a trial, PI3K inhibitors may be used, though they are associated with high toxicity and responses are often not durable.

While highly effective, the application of novel agents in the R/R setting presents distinct challenges. Real-world evidence from 2025-2026 indicates that treatment discontinuation with BTK inhibitors is significantly more frequent in R/R patients (74.3%) compared to the first-line setting, with adverse events being the most common cause. Infections represent the most frequent toxicity, and patients with prior immunochemotherapy exposure have an increased risk of discontinuation. Despite these challenges, specific regimens show strong efficacy; for instance, a 2021 study of zanubrutinib plus obinutuzumab reported a 92% overall response rate in R/R CLL patients, although grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 31% of patients. For the most heavily pre-treated populations, cellular therapies like allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR-T cells have shown promise, inducing regressions in refractory malignancies, including a complete remission in a CLL patient, albeit with notable toxicities such as tumor lysis syndrome and transient hypotension.

Bexobrutideg's Phase 3: A New Frontier in BTK Inhibition

The landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment has been profoundly reshaped by Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, moving away from traditional chemoimmunotherapy. However, for patients with relapsed/refractory CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have progressed on a covalent BTK inhibitor, treatment options become more limited, and outcomes remain challenging. This unmet need has driven the development of next-generation therapies, including non-covalent BTK inhibitors like pirtobrutinib.

Nurix Therapeutics' decision to advance bexobrutideg, a novel targeted protein degrader of BTK, into a global Phase 3 study is a bold move that could redefine the standard of care in this difficult-to-treat population. Unlike inhibitors that block BTK activity, degraders aim to eliminate the protein entirely, potentially offering a more profound and durable therapeutic effect, especially in the context of resistance mutations that can arise with covalent BTK inhibitors. The trial's head-to-head design against pirtobrutinib is a high-stakes endeavor. Demonstrating superiority in objective response rate and progression-free survival would not only establish bexobrutideg as a leading option but also validate the targeted protein degradation platform as a powerful new modality in oncology.

However, this ambitious trial comes with inherent risks. The bar for superiority against an already approved non-covalent BTK inhibitor is substantial. While BTK inhibitors generally offer improved tolerability over chemotherapy, studies indicate they are associated with specific adverse events such as cardiovascular issues, bleeding, and gastrointestinal effects. As a novel degrader, bexobrutideg's long-term safety profile, particularly with continuous administration, will be under close scrutiny. Furthermore, in a heavily pre-treated patient population where resistance mechanisms are common, the durability of response and the potential for new resistance pathways to emerge with a degrader remain critical considerations. The success of bexobrutideg could significantly shift market dynamics, intensifying competition and accelerating the pursuit of even more innovative approaches for patients with advanced CLL/SLL.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I treat relapsed refractory CLL?
Treatment for relapsed refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (R/R CLL) primarily involves targeted therapies, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors. For patients progressing on one class, switching to the other (e.g., BTK to BCL-2 inhibitor or vice versa) is a standard approach. Newer options like non-covalent BTK inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, and CAR T-cell therapy are also utilized, particularly for highly refractory cases or specific resistance profiles. The choice of therapy is guided by prior treatments, patient comorbidities, and specific resistance mechanisms.
What is the end stage of chronic lymphocytic leukemia?
The end stage of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is not a distinct, universally defined phase but rather refers to disease progression, often marked by transformation to a more aggressive lymphoma. The most common and clinically significant transformation is Richter's transformation (RT) to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This transformation is associated with rapid disease progression, resistance to standard CLL therapies, and a significantly poorer prognosis. Less common transformations include prolymphocytic leukemia or Hodgkin lymphoma.
What happens when chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapses?
When chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) relapses, the disease returns or progresses after a period of remission or stable disease following initial treatment. Patients typically experience a recurrence of symptoms, an increase in lymphocyte count, and often a more aggressive disease course. Relapsed CLL may be less responsive to prior therapies, necessitating different treatment strategies, including novel agents, targeted therapies, or clinical trials, with prognosis varying based on factors like time to relapse and genetic mutations.
Are there any clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)?
Clinical trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are actively ongoing, exploring novel therapeutic strategies and optimizing existing treatments. These trials frequently investigate new targeted agents, such as BTK inhibitors and BCL-2 inhibitors, often in combination or sequential regimens. Research also focuses on therapies for high-risk patients, those with relapsed/refractory disease, and minimal residual disease (MRD) eradication.
Can SLL go into remission?
SLL can go into remission following treatment, where signs and symptoms of the disease are absent. However, SLL is generally considered a chronic, incurable lymphoma, meaning that while remission can be achieved, the disease often recurs over time. Treatment aims to control the disease and manage symptoms, extending periods of remission rather than achieving a definitive cure.

References

  1. [1] Timmerman JM, Byrd JC et al.. A phase I dose-finding trial of recombinant interleukin-21 and rituximab in relapsed and refractory low grade B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012 Oct 15. 22893631
  2. [2] Visentin A, Mauro FR. Lights and shades of front-line treatment with covalent BTK inhibitors combined with venetoclax in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Oncology reviews. 2025. 41488721
  3. [3] Eyre TA, Roeker LE et al.. The efficacy and safety of venetoclax therapy in elderly patients with relapsed, refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. British journal of haematology. 2020 Mar. 31682002
  4. [4] Cheson BD. Monoclonal antibody therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Best practice & research. Clinical haematology. 2010 Mar. 20620977
  5. [5] O'Brien ME, Matutes E et al.. Fludarabine in lymphoproliferative disorders: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience. Leukemia & lymphoma. 1994. 7881347
  6. [6] Autore F, Visentin A et al.. Clinical Outcomes in Double-Exposed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Patients in Italy. Hematological oncology. 2026 Mar. 41778381
  7. [7] Hainsworth JD. Prolonging remission with rituximab maintenance therapy. Seminars in oncology. 2004 Feb. 15042530
  8. [8] Karsten H, Matrisch L et al.. Broadening the horizon: potential applications of CAR-T cells beyond current indications. Frontiers in immunology. 2023. 38090582
  9. [9] Campo E, Cymbalista F et al.. TP53 aberrations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an overview of the clinical implications of improved diagnostics. Haematologica. 2018 Dec. 30442727
  10. [10] Fraser G, Smith CA et al.. Alemtuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.). 2007 Jun. 17593982
  11. [11] Smolej L. The role of high-dose corticosteroids in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2012 Jul. 22616646
  12. [12] Haméon C, Houot R et al.. NOTCH1 Mutation Is Associated With Response to Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Retrospective Study. EJHaem. 2025 Oct. 41018006
  13. [13] Ghosh N, Sharman JP et al.. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes by Line of Therapy and Race in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma Treated in the United States: Results From the Final Analysis of the Prospective, Observational, informCLL Registry. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2024 Sep. 38845276
  14. [14] Fresa A, Innocenti I et al.. Treatment Sequencing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in 2024: Where We Are and Where We Are Headed. Cancers. 2024 May 25. 38893131
  15. [15] Hetta HF, Salama A et al.. Is Brukinsa (Zanubrutinib) a Safer Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor in Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Mar 12. 41901313
  16. [16] Eyre TA, Martinez-Calle N et al.. Acalabrutinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for CLL: 3-year follow-up of the real-world EPIC study. Blood advances. 2026 Jul 28. 42054544
  17. [17] Sobczyńska-Konefał A, Jasek M et al.. Insights into genetic aberrations and signalling pathway interactions in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: from pathogenesis to treatment strategies. Biomarker research. 2024 Dec 28. 39732734
  18. [18] Modi S, Rajarajan S et al.. Survival Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A SEER Analysis. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2026 Jan. 40887359
  19. [19] Allan JN. Have Fixed-Duration (FD) Regimens Delivered on Their Promise in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and What Is the Future of FD Regimens? A Narrative Review. Advances in therapy. 2026 Mar. 41627367
  20. [20] Tam CS, Quach H et al.. Zanubrutinib (BGB-3111) plus obinutuzumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma. Blood advances. 2020 Oct 13. 33022066

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts