New TALVEY® (talquetamab) plus daratumumab data demonstrate the potential strength of a novel bispecific combination in earlier-line relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Clinical Trial Updates

New TALVEY® (talquetamab) plus daratumumab data demonstrate the potential strength of a novel bispecific combination in earlier-line relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Published : 13 Jun 2026

At a Glance
IndicationMultiple Myeloma
DrugTalquetamab and Daratumumab
Mechanism of ActionGPRC5D bispecific antibody, CD38-directed antibody
CompanyJohnson & Johnson
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymMonumenTAL-3
NCT IDNCT05455320
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Primary EndpointProgression-free survival (PFS)
Secondary EndpointsOverall response rate (ORR), Complete response or better (≥CR), Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative ≥CR, Overall survival (OS), Safety
PFS Rate at 24 MonthsTal-DP: 81.3%, Tal-D: 77.6%, Standard of Care: 51.2%
OS Rate at 24 MonthsTal-DP: 89.2%, Tal-D: 87.9%, Standard of Care: 79.1%
PFS Hazard Ratio (Tal-DP vs DPd)0.28 (95% CI, 0.20-0.40; p<0.0001)
Comparator RegimenDaratumumab, Pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone (DPd)
Patient PopulationRelapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, at least one prior line of therapy, previously exposed to lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor
Median Follow-up24.6 months
Conference Presentation2026 European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Meeting
Regulatory SubmissionType II variation to EMA on March 31, 2026

Johnson & Johnson's TALVEY Plus Daratumumab Shows Superior PFS in RRMM

Johnson & Johnson announced positive Phase 3 MonumenTAL-3 study results for TALVEY (talquetamab) in combination with daratumumab, with or without pomalidomide, for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The regimen significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by up to 72.0% and the risk of death by up to 53.0% compared to daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd). At 24 months, progression-free survival (PFS) rates were up to 81.3% and overall survival (OS) rates up to 89.2% with the combination, demonstrating superior PFS and clinically meaningful OS improvements, supporting its use earlier in the treatment paradigm.

  • The MonumenTAL-3 study demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At 24 months, the Tal-DP arm achieved an 81.3% PFS rate and an 89.2% OS rate, while the Tal-D arm showed 77.6% PFS and 87.9% OS. These results represent a substantial reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (up to 72.0%) and death (up to 53.0%) compared to the standard DPd regimen, highlighting the combination's strong clinical benefit.
  • Beyond PFS and OS, the study also showed statistically significant improvements in key secondary endpoints, including overall response rate (ORR), complete response or better (≥CR), and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative ≥CR. ORRs were 88.2% (Tal-DP) and 88.5% (Tal-D) versus 77.6% (DPd). The study included 864 patients with RRMM who had received at least one prior line of therapy, with most being refractory to lenalidomide (85.1%) and their last line of therapy (93.4%).
  • The safety profile of the talquetamab plus daratumumab SC treatment arms was consistent with known monotherapy profiles, with a reduced risk of severe infections observed in the Tal-D arm compared to standard of care. Grade 3/4 infections were lowest in Tal-D (29.2%). Johnson & Johnson has submitted a Type II variation to the EMA on March 31, 2026, for the combination's use in adult RRMM patients who have received at least one prior therapy, aiming to bring this novel regimen to patients quickly.

The Critical Need for Earlier Bispecifics in RRMM

Recent research has identified several critical unmet medical needs in multiple myeloma despite significant therapeutic advances. The disease remains incurable for most patients, with 5-year survival rates below 50% and inevitable development of treatment resistance requiring new therapeutic approaches and targets.

High-Risk and Treatment-Refractory Populations:

• Patients with high-risk cytogenetics who show no improvement in overall survival with current anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies and require focused clinical trial development for specialized therapies

• Triple-refractory and heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients with limited treatment options, particularly those refractory to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and anti-CD38 antibodies

• Lenalidomide-refractory patients who demonstrate inferior progression-free survival with subsequent treatments, with overall survival after lenalidomide failure of only 14.7 months and PFS to further lines under 7 months

• Patients progressing after anti-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy, representing an emerging unmet clinical need as these therapies become more widely used

Special Patient Populations:

• Frail and older multiple myeloma patients requiring geriatric assessment and treatment modifications, identified through International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index and Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index scores

• Black populations who experience twice the diagnosis rate compared to White patients but face significant disparities in access to advanced therapies like CAR-T cell treatments

• Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), particularly in Black populations where both MGUS and multiple myeloma are more prevalent, requiring prevention strategies to delay or prevent progression

Treatment Resistance and Access Challenges:

• Double-refractory patients to lenalidomide and anti-CD38 agents who have exhausted standard therapeutic options and face very poor outcomes without access to clinical trials incorporating novel agents (8.8 months vs 30 months overall survival)

• Patients with continued disease progression who require durable responses, sustained minimal residual disease negativity, and earlier integration of immunotherapies into treatment protocols

• Underserved populations with limited global accessibility to advanced treatments including CAR-T therapies and bispecific antibodies, highlighting the need for addressing healthcare disparities and improving treatment availability

MonumenTAL-3: Talquetamab Combination's Efficacy and Safety Profile

Recent clinical studies have demonstrated significant advances in multiple myeloma treatment across various patient populations and disease stages. These studies encompass real-world data analyses, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses evaluating both established and emerging therapeutic combinations.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
DREAMM-7 Belantamab mafodotin + bortezomib + dexamethasone (BVd) vs daratumumab + bortezomib + dexamethasone (DVd) Median OS: not reached for both arms (HR 0.58; p=0.0002); MRD negativity: 25% vs 10%; Median DoR: 40.8 vs 17.8 months Most common grade 3-4 AE: thrombocytopenia (56% vs 35%); Treatment-related deaths: 7 (3%) vs 2 (1%)
IFM2017-03 Daratumumab + lenalidomide + reduced dexamethasone vs lenalidomide + dexamethasone Median PFS: 53.4 vs 22.5 months (HR 0.51; p<0.0001) Neutropenia: 55% vs 24%; Serious AEs: 63% vs 69%; Grade 5 TEAEs: 2% vs 2%
Hungarian D-Rd Real-World Study Daratumumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (second-line) ORR: 89%; Median PFS: 22.0 months; Median OS: not reached Three deaths due to severe infections; Mild hematologic toxicities and injection-related reactions
Italian D-Rd Survey Daratumumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (first-line, transplant-ineligible) ORR: 90%; VGPR or better: 59%; Median PFS and OS: not reached Not specifically detailed
Elotuzumab Meta-Analysis Elotuzumab combination regimens Not detailed (safety-focused analysis) Reduced neutropenia (RR=0.86); Increased pneumonia (RR=1.30), diarrhea (RR=1.16), pyrexia (RR=1.47)
Mexican BsAb Experience Bispecific antibodies with outpatient step-up dosing CR or better: 66%; MRD negativity: 84%; Median PFS: 12 months; Median OS: 13 months Lower AEs than clinical trials; 83% received outpatient step-up dosing
Venetoclax-Azacitidine Trial Venetoclax + azacitidine combination Comparable efficacy with enhanced response in high-risk cytogenetics; t(11;14) predictive of favorable response Neutropenia: 25%; Fatigue: 30%; Generally manageable toxicity profile
ANZ Myeloma Registry VRd vs Rd vs VCd (age >70, non-transplant) ORR: 91.5% vs 73.7% vs 85.6%; Median PFS: 27.5 vs 23.7 vs 20.5 months Not specifically detailed

GPRC5D Bispecifics: Talquetamab's Place in the Evolving Landscape

Multiple therapeutic agents are being investigated for multiple myeloma using similar mechanisms of action to talquetamab and daratumumab. These include additional CD38-targeting antibodies, BCMA-directed therapies, and other monoclonal antibodies with comparable cytotoxic mechanisms.

Target/Drug Class Agent Mechanism Status Intervention Model
CD38-Targeting Isatuximab Anti-CD38 mAb (different epitope than daratumumab) FDA approved with pomalidomide/dexamethasone Not specified
MOR202 Anti-CD38 mAb Clinical trials Not specified
TAK-079 Anti-CD38 mAb Clinical trials Not specified
BCMA-Targeting ADC Belantamab mafodotin BCMA antibody-drug conjugate EMA/FDA approved Retrospective multicenter analysis
BCMA BiTE Teclistamab BCMA/CD3 bispecific EMA/FDA approved Single-arm, open-label Phase 1 (MajesTEC-1)
Elranatamab BCMA/CD3 bispecific EMA/FDA approved Not specified
Linvoseltamab BCMA/CD3 bispecific EMA/FDA approved Not specified
BCMA CAR-T Idecabtagene vicleucel BCMA-targeting CAR-T EMA/FDA approved Retrospective multicenter analysis
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel BCMA-targeting CAR-T EMA/FDA approved Retrospective multicenter analysis
BCMA-CD38 bispecific CAR-T Dual BCMA/CD38 targeting Investigational Single-center, single-arm study
SLAMF7-Targeting Elotuzumab Anti-SLAMF7 mAb (ADCC, CDC, ADCP) Available since 2015 Phase 3 combination trials

MonumenTAL-3: Elevating Talquetamab's Role in Myeloma Treatment

The MonumenTAL-3 study results mark a pivotal moment for talquetamab, a novel bispecific antibody, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). By targeting GPRC5D on malignant plasma cells and CD3 on T cells, talquetamab activates a potent immune response. The Phase 3 data, demonstrating significant reductions in the risk of disease progression or death by up to 72.0% and death by up to 53.0% when combined with daratumumab (with or without pomalidomide), underscores its profound clinical impact. These impressive outcomes, including 24-month progression-free survival rates up to 81.3% and overall survival rates up to 89.2%, strongly advocate for its integration into earlier lines of therapy.

This strategic shift could significantly expand talquetamab's market presence, positioning it as a cornerstone therapy in combination regimens for RRMM. As a first-in-class GPRC5D/CD3 bispecific antibody, its robust efficacy offers a distinct competitive advantage in a crowded therapeutic landscape. The success of this combination approach also validates the strategy of pairing novel immune-engaging agents with established backbone therapies to achieve superior patient outcomes.

However, several considerations warrant attention. The 'up to' phrasing for risk reduction and survival rates, while indicative of strong efficacy, suggests that the full spectrum of patient responses and median benefits across the entire study population will be crucial for understanding real-world applicability. Furthermore, while daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) serve as a relevant comparator, the rapidly evolving RRMM treatment paradigm means ongoing evaluation against other emerging novel agents will be essential for sustained differentiation. Finally, earlier clinical data indicated that approximately a quarter of patients may not experience significant anticancer effects, highlighting the importance of patient selection and identifying predictors of response to optimize treatment strategies. This data positions talquetamab to redefine treatment expectations for many patients with RRMM, but careful consideration of its precise role and comparative benefits will be key to its long-term success.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the rationale for combining Talquetamab and Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma?
Combining Talquetamab, a GPRC5D-directed bispecific T-cell engager, with Daratumumab, a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody, offers a multi-pronged attack against myeloma cells. This strategy aims to leverage distinct mechanisms of action to enhance anti-tumor activity and overcome resistance pathways. Targeting two different surface antigens can lead to deeper and more durable responses in patients.
How does GPRC5D targeting with Talquetamab contribute to Multiple Myeloma treatment?
Talquetamab targets GPRC5D, a novel antigen highly expressed on myeloma cells but with limited expression on normal tissues, providing a distinct therapeutic avenue. This bispecific antibody redirects T-cells to GPRC5D-expressing myeloma cells, inducing T-cell mediated cytotoxicity. It offers a valuable option for patients, particularly those who have progressed on therapies targeting other antigens like BCMA.
What are the potential benefits of a dual-target approach in relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma?
A dual-target approach, such as combining agents that target GPRC5D and CD38, can lead to more comprehensive myeloma cell eradication by engaging multiple effector mechanisms. This strategy may mitigate antigen escape, a common resistance mechanism, and potentially achieve deeper and more durable remissions. It offers a promising avenue for patients with highly refractory disease who have exhausted other treatment options.
What are the key safety considerations for combination therapies involving bispecific antibodies in Multiple Myeloma?
Key safety considerations for combination therapies including bispecific antibodies involve managing immune-related adverse events, particularly cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Monitoring for hematologic toxicities, infections, and skin-related adverse events is also crucial. Proactive management strategies, including step-up dosing and supportive care, are essential to ensure patient safety and treatment adherence.

References

  1. [1] Al Hadidi S, Costello C et al.. Choosing Wisely in First Relapse of Multiple Myeloma: Expert Insights on Treatment Selection. Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia. 2026 Jun. 41936482
  2. [2] Garrido-Alejos G, Feliu A et al.. Availability of pharmacological treatments for multiple myeloma in Spain. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. 2026 Jan 31. 41619143
  3. [3] Richardson T, Tharmaseelan H et al.. Early Free Light-Chain Suppression as a Prognostic Marker in Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma Patients Treated With BCMA-Directed CAR-T Cells. EJHaem. 2025 Oct. 40896246
  4. [4] Akwata D, Kempen AL et al.. Discovery of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine-containing TAK1 kinase inhibitors with excellent activities against multiple myeloma. RSC medicinal chemistry. 2024 Jan 25. 38283221
  5. [5] Richardson PG, O'Donnell EK et al.. Isatuximab for the treatment of multiple myeloma: current clinical advances and future directions. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2025 Jul-Aug. 40657944
  6. [6] Zhu L, Nawaz MA et al.. Next-generation immunotherapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: Strategies to achieve sustained MRD negativity. Critical reviews in oncology/hematology. 2025 Oct. 40848821
  7. [7] Del Fabro V, Gullo L et al.. Long-Term Survival with Daratumumab, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Transplant-Ineligible Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients-A Survey from Two Italian Centers. Diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2026 Feb 21. 41745119
  8. [8] Frerichs KA, Minnema MC et al.. Efficacy and safety of daratumumab combined with all-trans retinoic acid in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood advances. 2021 Dec 14. 34625791
  9. [9] Qunaj L, Lentzsch S et al.. The Undetermined Significance of Screening for Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology. 2024 Dec 2. 39618251
  10. [10] Tang Y, Yin H et al.. High efficacy and safety of CD38 and BCMA bispecific CAR-T in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR. 2022 Jan 3. 34980210
  11. [11] Moore S, Cornic L et al.. Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving second-line treatment in England. EJHaem. 2025 Feb. 39866928
  12. [12] Ramírez-Alvarado AG, Varela-Constantino A et al.. Outpatient Delivery of Step-Up Doses to Rapidly Initiate Monthly Doses of Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma. European journal of haematology. 2026 Jul. 41881461
  13. [13] McEllistrim C, Krawczyk J et al.. New developments in the treatment of multiple myeloma - clinical utility of daratumumab. Biologics : targets & therapy. 2017. 28442888
  14. [14] Nijhof IS, Groen RW et al.. Preclinical Evidence for the Therapeutic Potential of CD38-Targeted Immuno-Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma Patients Refractory to Lenalidomide and Bortezomib. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2015 Jun 15. 25398450
  15. [15] Gozzetti A, Pacelli P et al.. MRD-negative conversion with daratumumab monotherapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients in ≥VGPR/MRD-positive after first-line therapy: Final analysis of the open-label, single-arm multicentric phase 2 trial DART4MM. British journal of haematology. 2026 Jun. 41888038
  16. [16] Kłosowska D, Ordak M et al.. Exclusion of patients with renal impairment from phase 3 randomized controlled trials in hematologic malignancies. International journal of cancer. 2026 Apr 1. 41195829
  17. [17] He J, Chiang K et al.. Identification of treatment effect modifiers and prognostic factors in newly diagnosed and relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Journal of comparative effectiveness research. 2025 Oct. 40793976
  18. [18] Jarrah MM, Al-Shamsi HO et al.. Treatment-Specific Prediction Models in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions. European journal of haematology. 2026 Jul. 41909977
  19. [19] Channar A, Naqvi SAA et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Quadruplet Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Transplant-Eligible Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.). 2025 Apr. 40176408
  20. [20] Zhang L, Tai YT et al.. Interferon-alpha-based immunotherapies in the treatment of B cell-derived hematologic neoplasms in today's treat-to-target era. Experimental hematology & oncology. 2017. 28725493

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts