New PSMAddition data show 58% lower risk of PSA progression with Pluvicto® in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Clinical Trial Updates

New PSMAddition data show 58% lower risk of PSA progression with Pluvicto® in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

Published : 18 May 2026

At a Glance
Indicationmetastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
DrugLutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan
Mechanism of ActionPSMA-targeted radioligand therapy
CompanyNovartis
Trial PhasePhase III
Trial AcronymPSMAddition
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Hazard Ratio0.42 (95% CI: 0.30-0.59)
Deep PSA Reduction (Week 48)87.4% (Pluvicto + SoC) vs. 74.9% (SoC alone)
Regulatory Submission RegionsUS, China, Japan
Regulatory Decision TimelineH2 2026
Conference NameAmerican Urological Association Annual Meeting 2026
Grade ≥3 Adverse Events50.7% (Pluvicto + SoC) vs. 43% (SoC alone)
Combination PartnerAndrogen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

Novartis' Pluvicto Shows 58% Lower PSA Progression Risk in mHSPC

Novartis announced new data from the PSMAddition study, demonstrating improved prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses with Pluvicto (lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan) combined with standard of care (SoC) in PSMA-positive metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Patients treated with Pluvicto plus SoC experienced a 58% lower risk of PSA progression (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.30-0.59) compared to SoC alone. The combination therapy also led to a higher frequency and depth of PSA response, with more patients achieving deep PSA reductions (<0.2 ng/mL) at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Regulatory submissions have been filed in the US, China, and Japan, with decisions anticipated in H2 2026.

  • The PSMAddition study revealed that combining Pluvicto with standard of care (androgen receptor pathway inhibitor [ARPI] + androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) resulted in a 58% lower risk of PSA progression compared to SoC alone. This statistically significant finding (HR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.30-0.59) underscores Pluvicto's potential to delay disease progression in PSMA-positive metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  • Patients receiving Pluvicto plus SoC achieved substantially deeper and more durable PSA reductions. For instance, at Week 48, 87.4% of patients in the Pluvicto combination arm achieved a PSA nadir of <0.2 ng/mL, compared to 74.9% in the SoC alone arm. This sustained deep response suggests a more profound impact on disease control and patient outcomes.
  • The safety and tolerability profile of Pluvicto in the PSMAddition study was consistent with previous trials (PSMAfore and VISION), with Grade ≥3 adverse events reported in 50.7% of the Pluvicto plus SoC arm versus 43% in the SoC alone arm. Novartis has already submitted regulatory applications in the United States, China, and Japan, with decisions expected in the second half of 2026, indicating a clear path towards potential market expansion.

PSMAddition Data: Deepening PSA Response in mHSPC

The STAMPEDE Trial evaluated metformin 850 mg twice daily added to standard care in 1874 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer across 112 hospitals in the UK and Switzerland. The study demonstrated no significant overall survival benefit, with median survival of 67.4 months in the metformin group versus 61.8 months in the standard care group (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.80-1.03; p=0.15). However, metformin significantly reduced adverse metabolic side-effects associated with androgen deprivation therapy. Safety analysis revealed grade 3 or worse adverse events in 57% of metformin patients versus 52% in the control group, with the side-effect profile primarily consisting of diarrhea and increased gastrointestinal events.

The ARON-3 Study examined enzalutamide in a real-world setting across 424 patients from 29 cancer centers in 9 countries. The intervention demonstrated robust efficacy with 76% of patients achieving PSA90 response (≥90% PSA reduction) at a median time of 6.0 months, and 59% achieving ultra-low PSA levels (≤0.2 ng/ml) at 8.3 months. Median time on treatment was 31.8 months with median overall survival not reached. The safety profile was favorable, with grade 3-4 adverse events occurring in only 9-10% of patients regardless of age group.

The EXTRA-PC Trial investigated masofaniten (EPI-7386) 600 mg twice daily combined with enzalutamide 160 mg daily plus androgen deprivation therapy in treatment-naïve mHSPC patients. In the first stage enrollment of 13 patients, 77% achieved PSA <0.2 ng/mL at 6 months (95% CI: 50%-92%), meeting the threshold to advance to stage 2. The combination demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with minimal progression, as only one patient developed metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and died during the median 9.9-month follow-up period.

Pluvicto's Potential to Redefine mHSPC Standard of Care

Recent evidence demonstrates that combination therapies have established superior efficacy compared to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) monotherapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Studies from 2018 onward, including the pivotal CHAARTED and STAMPEDE trials, showed that ADT combined with docetaxel-based chemotherapy provided substantial overall survival improvements of 14-22 months compared to ADT alone. Similarly, the LATITUDE and STAMPEDE trials established that ADT plus abiraterone/prednisone achieves identical survival benefits to chemohormonal treatment, offering an alternative for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy. However, despite this evidence, 20-60% of eligible patients remain undertreated due to geographic, financial, and systemic barriers.

Comparative analyses of newer androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) reveal distinct efficacy profiles in mHSPC. A 2024 retrospective analysis of 82 patients demonstrated that enzalutamide significantly prolonged PSA progression-free survival (HR 2.244; 95% CI 1.366-3.685, p=0.001), radiographic progression-free survival, castration-resistant prostate cancer progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to bicalutamide. Apalutamide similarly showed significant advantages in PSA-PFS (HR 5.071; 95% CI 1.711-15.032; P=0.003) and CRPC-PFS compared to bicalutamide, with both enzalutamide and apalutamide achieving superior deep PSA responses. Notably, abiraterone in combination with ADT did not demonstrate significant advantages in delaying disease progression when compared with these newer ARPIs.

Treatment selection challenges persist due to the absence of head-to-head trials and overlapping selection criteria across studies. Current evidence suggests that patients with high-volume disease may benefit most from chemohormonal treatment, while combination ADT plus ARPI represents a viable alternative. The PANTHER study specifically highlighted improved outcomes in Black patients treated with combination therapies, addressing important disparities in treatment access and outcomes. Safety profiles across combination regimens show manageable toxicity, with no significant differences in overall adverse event rates among the newer ARPIs, though ADT-related adverse events including osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes remain considerations for long-term treatment planning.

Beyond mHSPC: Pluvicto's Expanding Radioligand Therapy Pipeline

Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan is being investigated across multiple prostate cancer settings beyond its FDA-approved indication, with trials focusing on earlier disease stages and alternative treatment sequences. Current research encompasses taxane-naive populations, extended dosing regimens, and combination therapy approaches to optimize patient outcomes.

Taxane-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The PSMAfore trial (NCT04689828) is a phase 3 randomized controlled study comparing Lu-PSMA-617 (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for six cycles) versus androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) change in patients who progressed on previous ARPI therapy, with crossover permitted after radiographic progression

Chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients: A randomized, parallel-group, open-label phase 2 non-inferiority trial comparing Lu-PSMA-617 (6.0-7.4 GBq every 8 weeks, up to 4 cycles) versus docetaxel (75 mg/m² every 3 weeks, up to 10 cycles) in patients with high PSMA-expressing lesions

Extended dosing schedule optimization: The FLEX-MRT trial is a phase 2 randomized controlled study comparing standard fixed dosing (6 cycles) versus extended flexible dosing (up to 12 cycles with potential treatment holidays) in mCRPC patients, with response assessment guided by SPECT/CT and PSMA PET/CT imaging

Earlier disease stage exploration: Investigations are underway to evaluate Lu-PSMA-617 in earlier prostate cancer stages, potentially as first-line systemic treatment or in hormone-sensitive disease settings to delay chemotherapy exposure and improve long-term outcomes

Combination therapy development: Active research is exploring Lu-PSMA-617 combinations with chemotherapy, PARP inhibitors, and immunotherapy agents using parallel-group and dose-escalation study designs to enhance therapeutic efficacy

Pluvicto: A New Frontier in Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

The recent data from the PSMAddition study marks a pivotal moment for Pluvicto, Novartis's lutetium-177 PSMA radioligand therapy, as it demonstrates compelling efficacy in PSMA-positive metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). This represents a significant strategic move, extending the therapy's potential utility beyond its established role in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) into an earlier, larger patient population. The observed 58% reduction in the risk of PSA progression and the achievement of deeper, more frequent PSA responses with Pluvicto combined with standard of care are strong indicators of its potential to redefine treatment expectations in mHSPC.

This expansion into mHSPC carries several key implications:

  • It positions Pluvicto for substantial market growth, significantly broadening its addressable patient base and reinforcing Novartis's leadership in the burgeoning field of targeted radioligand therapies.

  • The strong clinical profile suggests a potential shift in the standard of care for mHSPC, offering a new, highly effective treatment intensification strategy that could improve long-term outcomes for patients.

However, the path forward is not without considerations. While regulatory submissions are underway in major markets, approvals are not anticipated until H2 2026, introducing a period of uncertainty. The evolving competitive landscape in mHSPC also means that continued innovation and differentiation will be crucial. Furthermore, while LuPSMA has demonstrated limited toxicity in advanced disease, the long-term safety and durability of response in this earlier disease setting will be closely scrutinized as real-world evidence accumulates. This development underscores a broader trend in prostate cancer management: the strategic deployment of precision therapies earlier in the disease continuum to maximize patient benefit and reshape therapeutic paradigms.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan target prostate cancer cells?
Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan is a radioligand therapy that specifically targets prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) highly expressed on prostate cancer cells. The vipivotide tetraxetan component acts as a ligand, binding to PSMA, which then delivers the therapeutic radionuclide Lutetium-177 directly to the tumor. This localized delivery of beta-particle radiation induces DNA damage and subsequent cell death in PSMA-expressing cancer cells.
What is the rationale for investigating Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer?
The rationale for investigating Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan in mHSPC stems from the high and consistent expression of PSMA in this disease stage, coupled with the established efficacy of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in later-stage prostate cancer. Introducing this targeted therapy earlier aims to improve patient outcomes by potentially delaying disease progression and extending survival. This approach leverages tumor-specific targeting to enhance therapeutic effect while minimizing systemic toxicity.
What are the key considerations for patient selection for Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan therapy?
Patient selection for Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan therapy primarily involves confirming adequate PSMA expression on tumor lesions, typically assessed via PSMA-PET imaging. Patients should also have a suitable performance status and adequate organ function, particularly renal and bone marrow function, to tolerate the treatment. Consideration of prior therapies and overall disease burden is also crucial to determine the appropriateness of this targeted radioligand therapy.
What is the typical safety profile of Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan?
The safety profile of Lutetium (177Lu) vipivotide tetraxetan commonly includes myelosuppression, such as anemia, thrombocytopenia, and leukopenia, as well as xerostomia due to PSMA expression in salivary glands. Other frequently observed adverse events can include fatigue, nausea, and dry mouth. Renal function is also closely monitored throughout treatment due to the renal excretion of the agent.

References

  1. [1] Ostuni E, Taylor MRG. Commercial and business aspects of alpha radioligand therapeutics. Frontiers in medicine. 2022. 36816719
  2. [2] Melchior F, Koett M et al.. Integration of Darolutamide in the Treatment Landscape for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety. European urology open science. 2026 Jan. 41439158
  3. [3] Morris MJ, Castellano D et al.. (177)Lu-PSMA-617 versus a change of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy for taxane-naive patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2024 Sep 28. 39293462
  4. [4] Ohlmann CH. [Patients with metastatic prostate cancer : Recommendations for primary hormonal or chemohormonal therapy]. Der Urologe. Ausg. A. 2017 Nov. 28983763
  5. [5] Issa W, Aliru M et al.. Real-World Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Ga68-PSMA-PET Positive Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer With or Without Conventional Imaging Correlates. Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2026 Feb. 41456466
  6. [6] Miyamoto H, Messing EM et al.. Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: current status and future prospects. The Prostate. 2004 Dec 1. 15389811
  7. [7] Nguyen DD, Satkunasivam R et al.. Association Between Sociodemographic Marginalization and Combination Therapy for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Population-Based Cohort Study in Ontario, Canada. JCO oncology practice. 2026 Jan 13. 41529225
  8. [8] Roy S, Saad F. Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a new horizon beyond the androgen receptors. Current opinion in supportive and palliative care. 2022 Dec 1. 36349381
  9. [9] Milecki P, Martenka P et al.. Radiotherapy combined with hormonal therapy in prostate cancer: the state of the art. Cancer management and research. 2010 Oct 11. 21188116
  10. [10] Lee CH, Kim S et al.. Comparative effectiveness of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor treatment intensification for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer in real-world patients. Investigative and clinical urology. 2025 Nov. 41184145
  11. [11] Kanayama M, Luo J. Delineating the Molecular Events Underlying Development of Prostate Cancer Variants with Neuroendocrine/Small Cell Carcinoma Characteristics. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021 Nov 25. 34884545
  12. [12] Tran HH, Yamaguchi A et al.. Radiotheranostic landscape: A review of clinical and preclinical development. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2025 Jun. 39891713
  13. [13] Cimadamore A, Boixareu C et al.. Novel Therapeutic Strategies for Metastatic Prostate Cancer Care. European urology. 2025 Nov. 40685286
  14. [14] Inaba Y, Urabe F et al.. Clinical Characteristics and Predictive Factors of Symptomatic Skeletal Events in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated With Denosumab. Clinical genitourinary cancer. 2026 Jun. 41934030
  15. [15] Catalano M, Lapucci A et al.. Platinum-based chemotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer: what possibilities?. Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology. 2024 Jan. 37934252
  16. [16] Gillessen S, Murphy L et al.. Metformin for patients with metastatic prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy: a randomised phase 3 trial of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. The Lancet. Oncology. 2025 Aug. 40639383
  17. [17] Jang A, Fowler P et al.. EXTRA-PC: a phase II trial of masofaniten (EPI-7386) and enzalutamide for patients with treatment-naïve metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. The oncologist. 2026 Jan 17. 41467749
  18. [18] Glass OK, Ramalingam S et al.. Resistance exercise training in patients with genitourinary cancers to mitigate treatment-related skeletal muscle loss. Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O. 2016 Jun. 27379813
  19. [19] Vaishampayan UN. Sequences and combinations of multifaceted therapy in advanced prostate cancer. Current opinion in oncology. 2015 May. 25811344
  20. [20] Prabhu RS, Russek R et al.. Unplanned Emergency Department or Inpatient Acute Care Within 1 Week After Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Frequency of Occurrence and Standard Operating Procedures for Radioprotection in These Situations. Practical radiation oncology. 2025 Mar-Apr. 39053602

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts