| Indication | Glabellar lines |
| Drug | Corabotase |
| Mechanism of Action | Recombinant neuroinhibitor |
| Company | Ipsen |
| Trial Phase | Phase II |
| Trial Acronym | LANTIC |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Topline Results Positive |
| Conference Name | 2026 Scale Symposium |
| Presentation Date | May 16, 2026 |
| Patient Population Size (Glabellar Lines) | 183 |
| Comparator Drugs | Placebo, Dysport |
| Corabotase Dose | 50ng |
| Primary Endpoint Outcome | 66% of patients showed ≥2-grade improvement (composite response) vs 0% with placebo at Week 4 (p=0.0001) |
| Sustained Duration of Effect (Corabotase) | 60.8% at Week 24 |
| Patient Satisfaction Score (Corabotase) | 82.8% at Week 24 |
| Onset of Action (Corabotase) | 0.84 days |
Ipsen's Corabotase Shows Sustained Efficacy and High Patient Satisfaction in Phase II
Ipsen presented positive first-in-class Phase II data for corabotase in moderate-to-severe glabellar lines at the 2026 Scale Symposium. The investigational recombinant neuroinhibitor demonstrated a rapid onset of action of 0.84 days and a statistically significant peak effect superior to placebo. At Week 24, 60.8% of patients treated with corabotase experienced a clinically significant sustained duration of effect, significantly outperforming both placebo (0.2%) and Dysport (36.7%). These strong efficacy results were further supported by high patient satisfaction scores, with 82.8% of patients reporting being "very satisfied" or "satisfied" at Week 24.
- The Phase II LANTIC trial demonstrated significant efficacy for corabotase (50ng) in treating glabellar lines. At Week 4, 66% of patients achieved a statistically significant ≥2-grade improvement (composite response) compared to 0% with placebo (p=0.0001). This sustained efficacy was evident at Week 24, where 60.8% of corabotase-treated patients maintained a clinically significant duration of effect, a notable improvement over placebo (0.2%) and Dysport (36.7%).
- Patient-reported outcomes highlighted the positive experience with corabotase, showing a rapid onset of action at just 0.84 days. Furthermore, patient satisfaction was consistently high, with 82.8% of individuals treated with corabotase (50ng) rating themselves as "very satisfied" or "satisfied" on the Subject Level of Satisfaction scale at Week 24. The treatment was also well-tolerated across all evaluated doses, with no significant safety concerns.
- Corabotase (IPN10200) is Ipsen’s first-in-class recombinant neuroinhibitor (RNI™), specifically engineered to optimize receptor affinity, enhance cellular uptake, and improve resistance to degradation, leading to sustained inhibition of neurotransmitter release. Following these promising Phase II results, the 50ng dose has been selected for further evaluation in the upcoming Phase III LAURITE program, with additional proof-of-concept data for other upper facial lines expected later this year from the ongoing LANTIC trial.
Corabotase Phase II Data: Sustained Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction
Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of several botulinum toxin formulations for treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines. A Phase III trial comparing CKDB-501A versus onabotulinumtoxinA in 300 subjects showed that 80.69% of CKDB-501A-treated patients achieved ≥2-point improvement in Facial Wrinkle Scale scores at week 4, compared to 70.83% for onabotulinumtoxinA, confirming non-inferiority. CKDB-501A, which is completely free from animal-derived components including human serum albumin, demonstrated sustained efficacy up to 16 weeks with approximately 70% of patients maintaining at least a 1-point improvement. Both treatments exhibited comparable safety profiles with no adverse events related to local or distant toxin spread, hypersensitivity reactions, or neutralizing antibody formation.
Another notable Phase III study (NCT05364580) evaluated Protoxin, a novel botulinum toxin type A, in 274 subjects through a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled design. Patients received 20 units injected at five glabellar sites, with week 4 improvement rates of 62.22% for Protoxin versus 62.96% for onabotulinumtoxinA. The study confirmed non-inferiority as the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval exceeded the predetermined -15% margin, and safety profiles remained comparable between treatment groups.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of LetibotulinumtoxinA-wlbg encompassing three randomized controlled trials with 1,272 patients revealed significant efficacy advantages over placebo. The composite responder rate at week 4 showed a risk ratio of 59.47 (95% CI: 14.95, 236.52), with sustained efficacy observed at weeks 12 and 16. Treatment resulted in significant improvements in investigator-assessed, subject-assessed, and psychological outcomes, including enhanced patient psychological well-being related to facial appearance. Importantly, no significant increase in serious, non-serious, or overall treatment-emergent adverse events was observed compared to placebo, supporting a favorable safety profile for this formulation.
Unpacking the LANTIC Phase II Trial Design for Corabotase
Recent clinical trials for glabellar line treatments have employed robust phase III designs with standardized assessment methodologies. These studies have consistently utilized randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled designs with extended follow-up periods to capture both efficacy and safety profiles across multiple botulinum toxin formulations.
• READY-1 study (2024): 3:1 randomized, 6-month, Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind study with RelaBoNT-A (50 U) versus placebo in 297 adults, featuring dual primary endpoints including composite ≥2-grade response and investigator-reported responder rates at Month 1
• SAKURA 1, 2, and 3 studies (2024): Comprehensive Phase 3 program with two randomized, double-blind studies and one open-label trial evaluating DaxibotulinumtoxinA 40 U in 2785 patients, assessing glabellar line severity for ≤36 weeks using IGA-FWS and PFWS scales
• PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs pilot study (2023): Phase 2 study with 154 patients randomized 1:1:1 to three dose groups (40 U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs, 20 U prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs, or 20 U onabotulinumtoxinA), utilizing Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate duration of effect as the primary endpoint
• AboBoNT-A solution Phase III (2022): Multicenter, multinational study (NCT02493946) with 2:1 randomization (50 U versus placebo) followed by open-label period with 4 treatment cycles, including comprehensive FACE-Q patient-reported outcome measures
• AbobotulinumtoxinA dose-escalation study (2021): 36-week multicenter, randomized, dose-ranging study in 399 subjects comparing 50, 75, 100, or 125 U doses versus placebo, with Week 4 composite ≥2-grade responder rate as primary endpoint
• Historical BOTOX study (2002): Foundational randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 264 patients using 20 U intramuscular injections into 5 glabellar sites, establishing 120-day follow-up protocols and physician rating scales for glabellar line severity assessment
Corabotase's Phase II Data Signals a Shift in Aesthetic Treatments
Ipsen's recent presentation of Phase II data for corabotase in glabellar lines represents a compelling development that could significantly influence the future of aesthetic medicine. As a first-in-class recombinant neuroinhibitor, corabotase offers a potentially novel approach to addressing facial lines, distinguishing itself from the well-established botulinum neurotoxins that primarily function by interrupting acetylcholine neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction. The data highlights two critical advantages: a remarkably rapid onset of action, observed at just 0.84 days, and a significantly extended duration of effect, with 60.8% of patients maintaining clinical significance at Week 24, notably outperforming Dysport.
This combination of speed and longevity, reinforced by high patient satisfaction, positions corabotase as a formidable contender in a highly competitive market. For Ipsen, this success not only validates their investment in recombinant neuroinhibitor technology but also suggests broader potential for this platform in other therapeutic areas where neuroinhibition is beneficial, akin to how baclofen is utilized for spasticity. However, the path forward is not without its challenges. While promising, Phase II results must be rigorously confirmed in larger, pivotal Phase III trials. Furthermore, as a novel agent, the long-term safety profile, including any potential for immunogenicity, will require careful monitoring. The competitive landscape is also poised for a response, with established players likely to innovate or intensify their market strategies. Ultimately, corabotase has the potential to elevate patient expectations and drive further innovation within the aesthetic neurotoxin space.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Hilton S, Kestemont P et al.. Liquid AbobotulinumtoxinA: Pooled Data From Two Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Studies of Glabellar Line Treatment. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2022 Nov 1. 36206385
- [2] Afshani SM, Samadi A et al.. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a biosimilar abobotulinum toxin type A in treating moderate-to-severe glabellar lines: A non-inferiority double blinded randomized controlled trial. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2022 Jun. 35340107
- [3] Pavicic T, Burgess C et al.. Aesthetic Improvements Over Time: Long-Term Efficacy and Additional Outcomes of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Simultaneous Treatment of Upper Facial Lines. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2025 Sep. 40968493
- [4] Son HS, Shin MK et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Novel Botulinum Toxin Type A (Protoxin) in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Phase III Study. Annals of dermatology. 2026 Feb. 41607140
- [5] Carruthers JA, Lowe NJ et al.. A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of glabellar lines. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2002 Jun. 12063480
- [6] Mueller DS, Prinz V et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Letibotulinumtoxin A in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2022 May 18. 35092418
- [7] Suljagić O, Tupković E et al.. Association of Botulinum toxin treatment due to aesthetic corrections in the face with the level of happiness, anxiety and depression. Medicinski glasnik : official publication of the Medical Association of Zenica-Doboj Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. 2025 Aug 25. 41082762
- [8] Gonçalves JR, Valesan LF et al.. Is Ready-To-Use AbobotulinumtoxinA More Effective Than OnabotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Lines? A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blinded Clinical Trial. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2026 Apr. 41889091
- [9] Bertucci V, Solish N et al.. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2020 Apr. 31791824
- [10] Long X, Li Z. Transplantation Treatment for Glabellar Frown Lines Using Autologous Fascial Adipose Tissue. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2026 Feb. 41057605
- [11] Rzany B, Ascher B et al.. Treatment of glabellar lines with botulinum toxin type A (Speywood Unit): a clinical overview. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2010 Jan. 19930409
- [12] Wu Y, Long X et al.. Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Recombinant Botulinum Toxin Type A for Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind, Phase III Trial in Chinese Adults. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2026 Feb 14. 41692601
- [13] Kim JE, Song EJ et al.. The efficacy and safety of liquid-type botulinum toxin type A for the management of moderate to severe glabellar frown lines. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2015 Mar. 25719692
- [14] Shi T, Lin H et al.. Vascular Embolism After Dull Needle Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Into Glabellar Wrinkles in Preformed Subdermal Tunnels: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2025 Jul. 40590095
- [15] Choi SY, Kim BJ et al.. Efficacy and Safety of CKDB-501A in Treating Moderate-To-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Center Phase III Trial. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2025 Jul. 40586136
- [16] Monheit GD, Baumann L et al.. Efficacy, Safety, and Subject Satisfaction After AbobotulinumtoxinA Treatment for Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2020 Jan. 31356432
- [17] da Silva Junior SV, Borges Neves MLB et al.. Comparing Ready-to-Use and Powder AbobotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Controlled, Triple-Blinded Clinical Trial. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2025 Jul. 40545952
- [18] Joseph J, Moradi A et al.. AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blind Study. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 2021 Sep 1. 34491016
- [19] Kestemont P, Hilton S et al.. Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Liquid AbobotulinumtoxinA Formulation for Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled and Open-Label Study. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2022 Feb 15. 34472596
- [20] Rahman E, Carruthers JD et al.. Targeting the glabellar frown lines with OnabotulinumtoxinA: In-silico evidence supporting concentrated, low-volume injection protocols. Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology. 2025 Nov. 40907830



















