ETX101 Durability Signal Promising, But Single-Arm Design and Data Opacity Leave Payer Path Unresolved
Clinical Trial Updates

ETX101 Durability Signal Promising, But Single-Arm Design and Data Opacity Leave Payer Path Unresolved

Published : 11 Sept 2026

The Overview
Encoded Therapeutics Inc. announced that new results from its POLARIS clinical program for ETX101, an investigational AAV9-based gene regulation therapy for SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome, will be presented at the 16th European Epilepsy Congress on September 7, 2026, in Athens, Greece. The presentation will feature up to 117 weeks of follow-up data, demonstrating substantial and sustained seizure reductions and clinically meaningful neurodevelopmental gains in children living with Dravet syndrome following a single dose of ETX101.
Knolens Analysis

The POLARIS announcement is a clinical milestone, not a regulatory or commercial inflection point — and that distinction matters. Encoded Therapeutics is presenting up to 117 weeks of follow-up from a single-dose AAV9-based gene regulation therapy in SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome, a population where only 10% of patients achieve seizure freedom on current therapies and mortality runs 10–20%. [1] The reported outcomes — sustained seizure reductions and neurodevelopmental gains — address both the primary disease burden and the developmental trajectory that prospective natural history data from the ENVISION study (NCT04537832) have now quantified as independently deteriorating: mean BSID-III Cognitive Composite scores declined by 11.0 points (95% CI: -15.3 to -6.8) by Month 12, and mean VABS-3 Adaptive Behavior Composite fell by 9.0 points (95% CI: -11.9 to -6.1) over 1.5 years. [2] Reporting gains against this backdrop is directionally meaningful. However, no quantitative efficacy figures, responder rates, or safety data from POLARIS are available in the current disclosure, making independent effect-size assessment impossible. No mechanistically matched precedent exists: the closest structural analogues — onasemnogene abeparvovec (AAV9 gene replacement in SMA, not SCN1A gene regulation in DS) and eladocagene exuparvovec (AAV2 gene replacement in AADC deficiency, not AAV9 gene regulation in DS) — both fail the mechanistic-fit bar and are retained only as partial regulatory strategy analogues. Both achieved conditional or accelerated approval on single-arm data with natural history comparators, but HTA bodies assessed evidence quality as low to very low and required long-term surveillance. The etranacogene dezaparvovec HTA (AAV5 gene replacement in hemophilia B — mechanistically distinct, flagged accordingly) established that 10–15 years of follow-up may be needed to evaluate lifelong gene therapy effects; 117 weeks falls substantially short. The sharpest risk is the combination of an unspecified evidence tier for POLARIS, absent quantitative data, and the unaddressed confound of concomitant antiseizure medication use — which, per ENVISION, is standard in this population and cannot be disentangled from ETX101's contribution without a comparator arm.

POLARIS data are presented without quantitative efficacy figures, safety data, or a randomized comparator arm. The 117-week follow-up is a structural positive but insufficient to resolve durability or long-term safety uncertainty for a single-dose, irreversible gene therapy in a pediatric population. [3][4]

At a Glance
IndicationSCN1A+ Dravet syndrome
DrugETX101
Mechanism of ActionAAV9-based gene regulation therapy
CompanyEncoded Therapeutics Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 1/2
Trial AcronymPOLARIS
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaRare Diseases & Genetics
Conference Name16th European Epilepsy Congress
Presentation DateSeptember 7, 2026
Presentation LocationAthens, Greece
Follow-up Durationup to 117 weeks
Administration Routeintracerebroventricular (ICV) injection
FDA DesignationsBreakthrough Therapy, Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy, Fast Track, Rare Pediatric Disease, Orphan Drug
EMA DesignationOrphan designation
FDA ProgramCMC Development and Readiness Pilot (CDRP) program
PresenterProfessor Ingrid Scheffer
Presentation TitleInterim Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of ETX101, a Gene Regulation Therapy for SCN1A+ Dravet Syndrome: Results from the POLARIS Phase 1/2 Program

Encoded to Present Positive ETX101 Gene Therapy Data for Dravet Syndrome

Encoded Therapeutics Inc. announced that new results from its POLARIS clinical program for ETX101, an investigational AAV9-based gene regulation therapy for SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome, will be presented at the 16th European Epilepsy Congress on September 7, 2026, in Athens, Greece. The presentation will feature up to 117 weeks of follow-up data, demonstrating substantial and sustained seizure reductions and clinically meaningful neurodevelopmental gains in children living with Dravet syndrome following a single dose of ETX101.

  • The upcoming presentation will detail up to 117 weeks of follow-up data from the POLARIS Phase 1/2 program for ETX101. These results highlight substantial and sustained reductions in seizures, alongside clinically meaningful neurodevelopmental improvements observed in children affected by SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome after receiving a single dose of the gene therapy.
  • ETX101 is an AAV9-based gene regulation therapy designed to increase the expression of the SCN1A gene, aiming to restore sodium channel function in inhibitory interneurons. This targeted approach addresses the underlying genetic cause of Dravet syndrome, offering the potential to treat the full spectrum of symptoms, including seizures, cognitive, communication, behavioral, and motor impairments.
  • ETX101 has garnered significant regulatory support, receiving multiple designations from the FDA, including Breakthrough Therapy, Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy, Fast Track, Rare Pediatric Disease, and Orphan Drug. Additionally, it was selected for the FDA’s CMC Development and Readiness Pilot (CDRP) program and granted Orphan designation by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

The Persistent Challenges in Treating SCN1A+ Dravet Syndrome

Despite meaningful advances in the pharmacological management of SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome, the condition remains profoundly difficult to treat. Approved anti-seizure medications (ASMs) reduce seizure burden but fall short of achieving complete seizure freedom or preventing cognitive decline, and disease-modifying therapies remain in early stages of development.

  • Pharmacoresistance and polypharmacy burden: Seizures in Dravet syndrome are highly drug resistant, requiring multiple ASMs. Initial broad-spectrum agents such as valproate (VPA) and clobazam (CLB) are generally insufficient to control seizures, necessitating escalation to adjunct therapies including stiripentol (STP), cannabidiol (CBD), and fenfluramine (FFA). Managing polypharmacy introduces clinically significant drug-drug interactions — for example, STP combined with CLB increases plasma concentrations of CLB and its active metabolite norclobazam, potentially increasing somnolence; CBD has a bi-directional interaction with CLB producing increases in plasma concentrations of 7-OH-CBD and norclobazam; and CBD is associated with elevations of liver transaminases, particularly in patients taking concomitant VPA.

  • Risk of seizure exacerbation with certain ASMs: Non-selective sodium channel blockers can exacerbate symptoms in patients with Dravet syndrome, given that the underlying SCN1A haploinsufficiency leads to hypoexcitability of GABAergic interneurons. This constrains the therapeutic options available and requires careful agent selection.

  • Incomplete understanding of chronic disease mechanisms: Early studies established that Nav1.1 loss preferentially impairs GABAergic interneuron function, particularly parvalbumin-positive fast-spiking interneurons (PVINs). However, the impaired action potential generation observed in PVINs during early development has been shown to normalize by postnatal day 35 in mouse models, suggesting that a transient impairment of PVINs contributes to epilepsy onset but is not the mechanism of ongoing, chronic epilepsy in Dravet syndrome. This implies that the pathomechanisms driving chronic seizures remain incompletely characterized.

  • Multisystem comorbidities beyond seizure control: Dravet syndrome is now recognized as a multisystem disorder with widespread developmental consequences. Children frequently exhibit cognitive impairment, motor and speech delays, and neuropsychiatric comorbidities such as anxiety, attention deficits, and autistic traits. Current treatments fail to prevent cognitive decline, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) remains a frequent and serious risk. Effective management strategies beyond seizure control — encompassing cognitive preservation and SUDEP prevention — represent a critical unmet need.

  • Disease-modifying therapy remains nascent: Disease-modifying approaches targeting the underlying SCN1A haploinsufficiency are at their beginning. Antisense oligonucleotides have so far proven to be the most successful within disease-modifying therapy, but require further refinement of methodology of application and delivery to target cells, as well as additional testing of effectiveness outside of TANGO technology. The full potential of gene therapy has yet to be explored, with high capacity adenoviral vectors capable of incorporating the SCN1A gene only recently prepared. CRISPR-derived platforms and genome-editing strategies also face significant translational challenges, including efficient and cell-type-specific delivery, long-term safety, and the risk of network-level side effects in the epileptic brain.

  • Absence of head-to-head comparative data for approved add-on ASMs: The comparative efficacy and safety of stiripentol, cannabidiol, and fenfluramine as add-on therapies have not been evaluated in head-to-head trials. Indirect comparisons suggest fenfluramine and stiripentol have comparable efficacy, but fenfluramine appeared to be safer in terms of less frequent serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), while cannabidiol had relatively lower efficacy and was associated with serious TEAEs. The trial on stiripentol had limited sample size, explaining wide confidence intervals for comparative outcomes, and a head-to-head trial between these agents has been identified as a critical need.

Targeting the Genetic Root of SCN1A+ Dravet Syndrome with ETX101

Dravet syndrome (SCN1A+) is driven at its genetic root by loss-of-function mutations — most commonly heterozygous — in SCN1A, the gene encoding the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav1.1. Nav1.1 haploinsufficiency selectively impairs the excitability of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons, particularly parvalbumin-expressing fast-spiking interneurons (PVINs) and somatostatin-expressing interneurons in the neocortex. Electrophysiological recordings in neocortical slices from Scn1a⁺/⁻ mice have revealed that both interneuron subtypes exhibit increased threshold and rheobase for action potential generation, decreased action potential frequency within trains, and more frequent firing failure. Critically, specific heterozygous deletion of Nav1.1 in forebrain GABAergic neurons is sufficient to reproduce all manifestations of Dravet syndrome in mice, confirming that interneuron dysfunction is a primary pathogenic driver. The deficit in somatostatin-expressing interneurons further causes significant reduction in frequency-dependent disynaptic inhibition between neighboring layer V pyramidal neurons, resulting in substantial disinhibition of cortical output.

Beyond this initial interneuron dysfunction, the disease course involves broader network and homeostatic alterations. In the CA1 hippocampal microcircuit, homeostatic synaptic changes have been identified in both CA1 pyramidal neurons and stratum-oriens interneurons, consistent with reduced excitation and inhibition onto CA1 pyramidal neurons and increased release probability at the CA1-SO synapse. These findings suggest global neuronal alterations within the CA1 microcircuit extending beyond the direct impact of Nav1.1 dysfunction. Furthermore, PVIN dysfunction has been shown to be transient: impaired action potential generation observed in PVINs during early development normalizes by postnatal day 35, with axon initial segment elongation suggesting a reorganization of axonal sodium channels as a compensatory mechanism. This implies that a transient impairment of PVINs contributes to epilepsy onset, but is not the mechanism of ongoing, chronic epilepsy in Dravet syndrome.

Genetic and molecular modifiers further shape disease severity and progression. The same SCN1A mutation can produce phenotypes ranging from mild GEFS+ to severe Dravet syndrome, and studies using a R1648H knock-in mouse model demonstrated that short repeated seizures at the age of disease onset transformed a mild/asymptomatic phenotype into a severe Dravet syndrome-like phenotype — including frequent spontaneous seizures and cognitive/behavioral deficits — exclusively in Scn1a⁺/⁻ mice, not in wild-type animals. This indicates a clear interaction between seizures and the mutation for the development of a severe phenotype generated by pathological remodeling, including increased excitability of hippocampal granule cells. At the molecular level, transcriptome analysis of DS-patient iPSC-derived GABAergic cells revealed dysregulation of genes governing chromatin structure, mitotic progression, neural plasticity, and excitability, with marked upregulation of the transcription factors FOXM1 and E2F1. Additionally, the GABA-A receptor subunit gene Gabra2 has been identified as a strain-specific genetic modifier of the Scn1a⁺/⁻ phenotype, with pharmacological manipulation via clobazam demonstrating dose-dependent protection against hyperthermia-induced seizures.

Promising Safety and Efficacy from ETX101's POLARIS Program

The available studies on fenfluramine in Dravet syndrome provide robust efficacy and safety data across randomized controlled trials, real-world programs, and long-term extension analyses. The knowledge base does not have sufficient information on this aspect. regarding SCN1A+ genotype-specific stratification — none of the studies below report outcomes restricted to SCN1A-positive patients or reference ETX101 or the POLARIS program.

The studies below reflect fenfluramine trials in Dravet syndrome broadly, as that is what the available literature covers.

Study Name Intervention Key Efficacy Outcomes Key Safety Outcomes
Fenfluramine for Treatment-Resistant Seizures in Patients With Dravet Syndrome Receiving Stiripentol-Inclusive Regimens (NCT02926898) Fenfluramine 0.4 mg/kg/d (max 17 mg/d) add-on to stiripentol-inclusive regimens 54.0% (95% CI, 35.6%–67.2%; p < .001) greater reduction in mean monthly convulsive seizure frequency vs. placebo; 54% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction vs. 5% with placebo (p < .001); median longest seizure-free interval 22 days vs. 13 days (p = .004) Decreased appetite (44% vs. 11%), fatigue (26% vs. 5%), diarrhea (23% vs. 7%), pyrexia (26% vs. 9%); no clinical or echocardiographic evidence of valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension
Fenfluramine in the treatment of Dravet syndrome: Results of a third randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial Fenfluramine 0.7 mg/kg/d or 0.2 mg/kg/d (max 26 mg/d), not on stiripentol 64.8% (95% CI 51.8%–74.2%) greater reduction in monthly convulsive seizure frequency vs. placebo (p < .0001); 72.9% of patients on 0.7 mg/kg/d achieved ≥50% reduction vs. 6.3% with placebo (p < .0001); median longest seizure-free interval 30 days vs. 10 days (p < .0001) Decreased appetite, somnolence, pyrexia, and decreased blood glucose (all >15% in fenfluramine groups, higher than placebo); no evidence of valvular heart disease or pulmonary artery hypertension
Efficacy, tolerability, and retention of fenfluramine: Compassionate Use Program in Germany Fenfluramine 0.13–0.7 mg/kg/day add-on (n = 78; median age 8.0 years) Responder rate (≥50% reduction) 68% for total seizures at 3 months; seizure-freedom rate 14% (total) and 23% (generalized tonic-clonic) at 3 months; median seizure days/month decreased from 10.0 to 3.0 (p < .001); status epilepticus episodes reduced (28% vs. 14%, p = .005); 85% retained on treatment at last follow-up Somnolence (36%), decreased appetite (22%), ataxia (8%); 62% reported meaningful global clinical improvement
Improved everyday executive functioning following profound reduction in seizure frequency with fenfluramine (Phase 3 Long-Term Extension) Fenfluramine (OLE, titrated to max 26 mg/day; n = 58; mean age 11 ± 4 years) 75% median percentage reduction in seizure frequency from pre-randomization baseline at OLE Year 1; 78% achieved ≥50% monthly convulsive seizure frequency reduction; ≥50% reduction group significantly more likely to achieve clinically meaningful improvement in Emotion Regulation Index (p = 0.002) and Cognitive Regulation Index (p = 0.001) No significant differences in proportions showing clinically meaningful worsening on BRIEF®2 indexes/composite between reduction groups

The knowledge base does not have sufficient information on this aspect.

Assessing the Long-Term Durability of Response for ETX101

Published data on long-term outcomes in Dravet syndrome (DS) — predominantly in SCN1A mutation-positive patients — spans three approved antiseizure medications (ASMs): stiripentol, cannabidiol (CBD), and fenfluramine. A 12-year prospective observational study of stiripentol (2003–2015; n=41; median treatment duration 37 months, range 2–141 months) found that 20 out of 41 patients achieved ≥50% long-term reduction in generalized tonic-clonic seizure frequency, 11 out of 23 achieved ≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency, and 11 out of 26 achieved ≥50% reduction in status epilepticus frequency. The most common adverse events were anorexia, weight loss, sedation, and behavioural changes; one patient developed recurrent pancreatitis on concurrent valproate. For fenfluramine, an open-label extension (OLE) study enrolling 232 patients demonstrated a median decrease in convulsive seizure frequency of -66.8% (range = -100% to 234.9%; P < .001) over a median treatment duration of 256 days (range = 46–634 days), with similar reductions in patients <6 years (-75.7%) and ≥6 years (-64.7%). A subsequent OLE analysis of 327 patients (median treatment duration 23.9 months, range 0.2–42.6 months) further supported durability, with no systematic loss of efficacy observed in long-term DS cohorts per a meta-analysis of 20 studies (4 randomized, 16 observational) comprising 1,387 patients, which reported pooled ≥50% responder rates of 64.8% (95% CI 56.1–72.7) and seizure freedom in 11.4% (95% CI 7.2–17.6).

Cardiovascular safety has been a particular focus for fenfluramine given its historical association with cardiac valvulopathy at weight-loss doses. Across both OLE studies — enrolling 232 and 327 patients respectively — serial transthoracic echocardiography performed at standardized intervals found no cases of valvular heart disease (VHD) or pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), with the larger cohort representing up to 42.6 months of exposure. A pooled mortality analysis across 732 persons with DS treated with fenfluramine (1,185.3 person-years of exposure) reported an all-cause mortality rate of 1.7 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 0.4 to 6.7) and a SUDEP rate lower than the all-cause estimate of 15.8 per 1,000 person-years (95% CI, 9.9 to 25.4) and SUDEP estimate of 9.3 (95% CI, 5.0 to 17.3) reported for persons with DS receiving standard-of-care, though further studies were noted as warranted to confirm whether fenfluramine reduces SUDEP risk and to elucidate potential mechanisms.

Beyond seizure control, natural history data underscore persistent non-seizure deficits. Cognitive slowing becomes evident during the second year of life in all DS cases, with early appearance of absences and myoclonic seizures associated with the worst cognitive outcome; statistical analysis failed to reveal differences in cognitive outcome with regard to the presence and type of SCN1A mutation. In adulthood, overall seizure frequency — particularly myoclonic, atypical absence, and focal seizures with impaired awareness — tends to decrease, and adults show a notable reduction in status epilepticus, especially after 30 years of age, though behaviour problems persist and are associated with lower health-related quality of life. A comprehensive 2024 review noted that natural history studies continue to underscore persistent deficits in cognitive development and quality of life, and highlight suboptimal long-term seizure control despite the use of the three approved ASMs.

Dravet Syndrome: ETX101's Long-Term Data Signals a Paradigm Shift

Dravet syndrome represents one of the most challenging pediatric epilepsies, characterized by severe, refractory seizures and significant neurodevelopmental delays stemming from SCN1A haploinsufficiency. For years, treatment has focused on managing symptoms, often with limited success. The emerging data for ETX101, an AAV9-based gene regulation therapy, signals a potential paradigm shift, moving towards a disease-modifying approach.

The reported sustained seizure reductions and clinically meaningful neurodevelopmental gains over an impressive 117-week follow-up period are particularly compelling. This suggests that ETX101 is not merely suppressing seizures but may be addressing the underlying neurological dysfunction, offering a chance for children to achieve developmental milestones previously out of reach. This long-term efficacy and impact on neurodevelopment could position ETX101 as a foundational therapy, differentiating it from other gene-targeted approaches and conventional treatments.

However, as with any novel gene therapy, critical considerations remain:

  • Long-term Safety: While preclinical data showed a favorable safety profile, the potential for delayed immunogenic responses or other adverse events associated with AAV9 delivery and sustained transgene expression requires ongoing vigilance.

  • Durability: The 117-week data is encouraging, but the ultimate long-term durability of a single-dose therapy in a lifelong condition will be crucial for its clinical utility.

  • Patient Heterogeneity: Understanding the therapy's consistent efficacy and safety across the diverse spectrum of SCN1A+ Dravet syndrome patients, including those with different genetic variants or disease stages, will be vital.

Ultimately, the continued positive trajectory of ETX101 could validate the broader AAV9 gene regulation platform, potentially accelerating the development of similar targeted therapies for other severe neurological disorders. This represents a significant step forward in precision medicine for genetic epilepsies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the life expectancy of someone with Dravet syndrome?
Individuals with Dravet syndrome have a significantly reduced life expectancy compared to the general population. The primary cause of premature mortality is Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP), with status epilepticus, accidents related to seizures, and aspiration pneumonia also contributing factors. While many individuals survive into adulthood, median life expectancy is often cited as being in the second to fourth decade, though this can vary considerably based on seizure control and comprehensive management.
Is Dravet syndrome considered a disability?
Dravet syndrome is widely recognized as a severe, lifelong neurological disorder that significantly impairs an individual's physical and cognitive functions. Its characteristic intractable seizures, profound developmental delays, intellectual disability, and motor deficits meet the criteria for a disability under most national and international frameworks. These multifaceted challenges necessitate extensive medical care, specialized educational support, and often lifelong assistance, qualifying individuals for disability benefits and services.
Is Dravet syndrome a form of autism?
Dravet syndrome is not a form of autism; it is a severe genetic epileptic encephalopathy primarily caused by *SCN1A* gene mutations. While distinct, a significant proportion of individuals with Dravet syndrome develop autistic features or are diagnosed with comorbid Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This comorbidity reflects the complex neurodevelopmental impact of the underlying genetic condition, rather than Dravet syndrome being a subtype of autism.
What are the diseases associated with SCN1A mutations?
SCN1A mutations are primarily associated with a spectrum of severe early-onset epileptic encephalopathies, most notably Dravet Syndrome (DS), also known as Severe Myoclonic Epilepsy of Infancy (SMEI). They also contribute to Genetic Epilepsy with Febrile Seizures Plus (GEFS+), Intractable Childhood Epilepsy with Generalized Tonic-Clonic Seizures (ICEGTC), and some cases of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome. Beyond epilepsy, SCN1A variants have been implicated in conditions such as migraine, autism spectrum disorder, and intellectual disability, often co-occurring with seizure disorders.
What medications should be avoided in patients with Dravet syndrome?
Patients with Dravet syndrome should generally avoid sodium channel blocking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, and phenytoin. These medications can paradoxically worsen seizures, particularly myoclonic and generalized tonic-clonic seizures, due to the underlying SCN1A gene mutation.
What is the new treatment for Dravet syndrome?
Fenfluramine (Fintepla) is a new treatment for Dravet syndrome, approved in 2020 by the FDA and EMA. It is a serotonin releasing agent indicated for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome in patients aged two years and older. Clinical trials demonstrated significant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency when added to existing antiepileptic regimens.
How bad is Dravet syndrome?
Dravet syndrome is a severe, rare, and intractable developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by early-onset, frequent, and prolonged seizures often resistant to multiple anti-seizure medications. Beyond epilepsy, patients experience significant global developmental delays, cognitive impairment, behavioral comorbidities (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, ADHD), and motor deficits. The condition carries a high risk of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and requires lifelong, complex management, profoundly impacting quality of life.

References

  1. [1] Fallico MJ, Alberca LN et al.. In silico screening to search for selective sodium channel blockers: When size matters. Brain research. 2025 Jun 1. 40096941
  2. [2] Janković SM, Janković SV et al.. Investigational new drugs for the treatment of Dravet syndrome: an update. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. 2023 Apr. 36932738
  3. [3] Tonesi N, Berselli E et al.. Emerging Insights into the Pathogenic Mechanisms of Dravet Syndrome. Neurochemical research. 2025 Jun 26. 40569358
  4. [4] Bishop KI, Isquith PK et al.. Improved everyday executive functioning following profound reduction in seizure frequency with fenfluramine: Analysis from a phase 3 long-term extension study in children/young adults with Dravet syndrome. Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 2021 Aug. 34023810
  5. [5] Zhong J, Lin Z et al.. Pharmacovigilance study on old drugs repurposed for rare diseases across different indications: the case of fenfluramine. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2025. 41069603
  6. [6] Janszky J, Janszky J Jr et al.. Fenfluramine for seizures in Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Mechanisms, clinical evidence, safety, and practical integration. Epilepsy & behavior reports. 2026 Sep. 42389070
  7. [7] Samanta D. A comprehensive review of evolving treatment strategies for Dravet syndrome: Insights from randomized trials, meta-analyses, real-world evidence, and emerging therapeutic approaches. Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 2025 Jan. 39612634
  8. [8] Sullivan J, Lagae L et al.. Fenfluramine in the treatment of Dravet syndrome: Results of a third randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Epilepsia. 2023 Oct. 37543865
  9. [9] Selvarajah A, Zulfiqar-Ali Q et al.. A systematic review of adults with Dravet syndrome. Seizure. 2021 Apr. 33677403
  10. [10] Pinsent A, Weston G et al.. Determining the Relationship Between Seizure-Free Days and Other Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Dravet Syndrome and Their Carers from FFA Registration Studies. Neurology and therapy. 2023 Oct. 37328668
  11. [11] Berecki G, Bryson A et al.. Biophysical characterization and modelling of SCN1A gain-of-function predicts interneuron hyperexcitability and a predisposition to network instability through homeostatic plasticity. Neurobiology of disease. 2023 Apr. 36868483
  12. [12] Strzelczyk A, Becker H et al.. Fenfluramine for the treatment of status epilepticus: use in an adult with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and literature review. Neurological research and practice. 2024 Feb 22. 38383582
  13. [13] Seh BA, Rafiq K et al.. Targeted Gene and Genome-Editing Strategies for Epilepsy: Experimental Advances and Translational Challenges. International journal of molecular sciences. 2026 Mar 20. 41898703
  14. [14] Massaroni V, Ascione F et al.. Beyond seizure control: Functional and caregiver-reported outcomes of long-term fenfluramine treatment in Dravet syndrome. Epilepsy & behavior : E&B. 2026 Jul. 42001857
  15. [15] Salgueiro-Pereira AR, Duprat F et al.. A two-hit story: Seizures and genetic mutation interaction sets phenotype severity in SCN1A epilepsies. Neurobiology of disease. 2019 May. 30659983
  16. [16] Guzzetta F. Cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with Dravet syndrome: an overview. Epilepsia. 2011 Apr. 21463277
  17. [17] Agarwal A, Farfel GM et al.. Long-term cardiovascular safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome treated for up to 3 years: Findings from serial echocardiographic assessments. European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society. 2022 Jul. 35640431
  18. [18] Almog Y, Mavashov A et al.. Functional Investigation of a Neuronal Microcircuit in the CA1 Area of the Hippocampus Reveals Synaptic Dysfunction in Dravet Syndrome Mice. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience. 2022. 35370551
  19. [19] Tai C, Abe Y et al.. Impaired excitability of somatostatin- and parvalbumin-expressing cortical interneurons in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2014 Jul 29. 25024183
  20. [20] Sourbron J, Lagae L. Fenfluramine: a plethora of mechanisms?. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2023. 37251322

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts