ELI-002 7P Phase 1 in Neoadjuvant PDAC: Rational Design, Sobering Precedent, Unproven Survival Path
Clinical Trial Updates

ELI-002 7P Phase 1 in Neoadjuvant PDAC: Rational Design, Sobering Precedent, Unproven Survival Path

Published : 11 Aug 2026

The Overview
Elicio Therapeutics has announced the activation of an investigator-initiated Phase 1 study (NCT07671339) evaluating ELI-002 7P for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The study, conducted by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and funded by The Lustgarten Foundation and Break Through Cancer, will assess ELI-002 7P in combination with chemotherapy and an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor in the neoadjuvant setting. Expected to enroll 20 patients, the trial aims to generate clinical insights into ELI-002 7P's potential to improve surgical outcomes and long-term survival for patients with this devastating KRAS-driven disease.
Knolens Analysis

ELI-002 7P enters the neoadjuvant PDAC space with scientific coherence but without a single successful Phase 3 precedent to anchor its development trajectory. The amphiphile platform's lymph-node trafficking efficiency and prior KRAS-specific T-cell responses correlating with survival represent genuine mechanistic differentiation, but they do not yet constitute clinical proof. [1] The most directly comparable neoadjuvant PDAC vaccine trial — algenpantucel-L, a Phase 3 RCT of 303 patients — produced a median OS of 14.9 months (standard) versus 14.3 months (experimental), HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.66–1.58, P = 0.98, with no PFS benefit (HR 1.33, P = 0.59). [2] That precedent carries a mechanistic caveat: algenpantucel-L used allogeneic whole tumor cells, not a targeted KRAS mutation approach, and crucially did not include checkpoint inhibition. ELI-002 7P's triple combination — vaccine plus chemotherapy plus anti-PD1 — is structurally distinct and aligns with the field's drift toward rational combination immunotherapy. The autogene cevumeran Phase 1 data (16 patients, single-arm) showed vaccine-induced T-cell responses in 8 of 16 patients correlating with recurrence-free survival not reached versus 13.4 months in non-responders (P = 0.003), but this was in the adjuvant post-surgical setting, not neoadjuvant, and carries Phase 1 single-arm evidence weight only — it cannot be treated as efficacy validation. [3] A 526-patient NCDB retrospective analysis found no significant OS difference between neoadjuvant and adjuvant immunotherapy in PDAC (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79–1.41, P = 0.714), and the univariate signal for neoadjuvant immunotherapy benefit (HR 0.88, P = 0.026) disappeared in multivariable analysis — a direct challenge to the timing hypothesis underlying this trial design. [4] No ICER or HTA analysis for ELI-002 7P exists at this stage. With 20 patients, no control arm, an unspecified chemotherapy backbone, and an unspecified anti-PD1 agent, the trial can generate immunologic and surgical outcome signals but cannot establish survival benefit. No precedent that clears the full mechanistic-fit bar — targeted KRAS vaccine, neoadjuvant setting, checkpoint inhibitor combination — exists. The sharpest risk is that Phase 1 immunologic success will not predict Phase 3 survival benefit in a tumor microenvironment with a documented record of defeating every immunotherapy approach tested to date at the pivotal level.

NCT07671339 is a 20-patient single-arm Phase 1 trial with no comparator arm; prior ELI-002 survival correlation data lacks published trial-level detail, and the only Phase 3 RCT in the same neoadjuvant PDAC vaccine setting (algenpantucel-L, n=303) showed HR 1.02, P=0.98 with no survival benefit. [2]

At a Glance
IndicationPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
DrugELI-002 7P
Mechanism of ActionKRAS-mutant specific AMP immunotherapy
CompanyElicio Therapeutics Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 1
NCT IDNCT07671339
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Therapeutic AreaOncology
InvestigatorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Funding OrganizationsThe Lustgarten Foundation, Break Through Cancer
Patient PopulationResectable or borderline resectable KRAS-mutant PDAC
Enrollment Size20 patients
Combination ChemotherapymFOLFIRINOX
Combination Checkpoint InhibitorTislelizumab
Line of TherapyNeoadjuvant
Biomarker CollectionTumor tissue, blood samples
Drug TechnologyAMP technology
KRAS Mutation CoverageSeven most common KRAS mutations

Elicio Activates Phase 1 Neoadjuvant Study for ELI-002 7P in PDAC

Elicio Therapeutics has announced the activation of an investigator-initiated Phase 1 study (NCT07671339) evaluating ELI-002 7P for resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The study, conducted by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and funded by The Lustgarten Foundation and Break Through Cancer, will assess ELI-002 7P in combination with chemotherapy and an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor in the neoadjuvant setting. Expected to enroll 20 patients, the trial aims to generate clinical insights into ELI-002 7P's potential to improve surgical outcomes and long-term survival for patients with this devastating KRAS-driven disease.

  • The newly activated randomized, open-label Phase 1 investigator-initiated trial will enroll 20 patients diagnosed with resectable or borderline resectable KRAS-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Participants will receive ELI-002 7P alongside standard chemotherapy, mFOLFIRINOX, with or without the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor tislelizumab, initiating treatment before surgery.
  • This study builds upon previous observations of complete responses in patients with metastatic PDAC treated with sequential ELI-002 7P, checkpoint inhibitors, and chemotherapy. Researchers aim to prospectively evaluate this combination in the neoadjuvant setting, hoping to generate crucial clinical insights into ELI-002 7P's ability to reshape the tumor immune environment and enhance surgical outcomes and long-term survival.
  • ELI-002 is Elicio's lead investigational AMP cancer immunotherapy, designed to target cancers driven by KRAS-gene mutations. The ELI-002 7P formulation is an off-the-shelf subcutaneous administration, engineered to provide immune response coverage against seven of the most common KRAS mutations, thereby broadening its potential applicability to a larger patient population.

The Persistent Challenge of Resectable KRAS-Mutant PDAC

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma continues to present one of oncology's most intractable therapeutic challenges, with multiple high-priority unmet needs persisting despite incremental advances in systemic therapy. Distinct patient subpopulations have emerged as focal points for clinical investigation, each defined by disease stage, molecular profile, or prior treatment history.

  • Borderline-Resectable and Locally-Advanced Disease: Patients with borderline-resectable (BRPC) and locally-advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) lack an agreed-upon standard of care, with no consensus on the optimal use of chemotherapy, radiation, or combination approaches in the neoadjuvant setting. The STEREOPAC trial is actively addressing this gap by evaluating neoadjuvant sequences combining modified FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy.

  • Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD)-Positive Patients: HRD-positive status — defined by BRCA1/2 biallelic loss-of-function and/or an HRD score ≥42 — identifies a molecularly distinct population (4.9% of patients) that derives substantial benefit from platinum-based adjuvant therapy, with a median PFS of 44.1 months versus 12.2 months in HRD-negative patients. This broader HRD definition meaningfully expands the eligible population beyond BRCA1/2 mutation carriers alone (1.9%).

  • Chemotherapy-Refractory Unresectable Disease: Patients progressing on first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel represent a population with very limited second-line options. The STNM01 trial evaluated stroma-modifying therapy combined with S-1 in this setting, reporting a median overall survival of 7.8 months and a disease control rate of 77.3%.

  • Immune "Cold" Tumor Microenvironment: PDAC's dense immunosuppressive stroma, low tumor mutational burden, and minimal cytotoxic T-cell infiltration render it largely refractory to conventional immunotherapy approaches. Emerging strategies targeting this biology — including personalized mRNA neoantigen vaccines and mutant-KRAS–directed vaccines — have demonstrated sustained vaccine-induced T-cell responses associated with improved recurrence-free survival in the surgically resected setting.

  • Treatment Sequencing in Metastatic Disease: There is currently no evidence-based guidance on the preferred sequencing of FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Data suggest that the overall survival advantage associated with first-line FOLFIRINOX is attenuated in patients receiving two or more lines of therapy (median OS 12.1 vs. 13.1 months), underscoring an unmet need for prospective sequencing strategies that preserve downstream therapeutic benefit.

Elicio's Neoadjuvant ELI-002 7P Study Design and Goals

Elicio Therapeutics' neoadjuvant ELI-002 7P program sits within a broader PDAC clinical trial landscape characterized by diverse study designs, ranging from phase I/II dose-escalation cohorts to large randomized phase III adjuvant trials. The table below summarizes key design parameters and endpoints across the most clinically relevant studies informing neoadjuvant and perioperative strategy in PDAC.

Trial Phase & Design Population Treatment Arms Primary Endpoint(s) Key Results
Glecirasib (pooled) Phase I/II, open-label, pooled analysis (n=54 solid tumors; 32 PDAC) KRAS G12C-mutant solid tumors; ≥2 prior lines in 24 patients Oral glecirasib monotherapy Objective response rate (ORR) Confirmed ORR 50.9% overall; 46.9% in PDAC; median PFS 5.5 mo, median OS 10.8 mo (PDAC); grade ≥3 TRAEs in 27.8%
GEMOX PAI Phase II, open-label, randomized (n=51; 1:1) Treatment-naïve unresectable pancreatic cancer Pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) vs. intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) with GEMOX OS, PFS, ORR, DCR, 6-month and 1-year survival Median OS: 9.93 mo (PAI) vs. 10.07 mo (IVC) (p=0.3049); 6-month OS rate significantly higher with PAI (100% vs. 83.67%, p=0.0173)
NEONAX Phase II, prospective, randomized, open-label (n=166; 1:1) Resectable PDAC (≤cT3, N0/N1, cM0) Arm A: perioperative nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (2 cycles pre + 4 cycles post-surgery) vs. Arm B: adjuvant nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine (6 cycles) Disease-free survival (DFS) at 18 months Secondary: 3-year OS/DFS rate, R0/R1 resection rate, QoL, pharmacogenomic and biomarker correlates
Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX retrospective cohort International multicenter retrospective cohort (n=520; 31 centers, 19 countries; 2012–2018) Nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer; ≥2 cycles neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX prior to surgery Adjuvant chemotherapy vs. no adjuvant chemotherapy post-resection Association of adjuvant chemotherapy with OS Median OS 38 mo from diagnosis; no survival benefit overall (HR 0.99; p=0.93); adjuvant chemotherapy associated with improved OS in node-positive patients (median OS 26 vs. 13 mo; HR 0.41; p=0.004)
Abemaciclib (Phase II) Phase II, open-label, 2-stage randomized (n=106) Metastatic PDAC; 1–2 prior therapies Abemaciclib mono; abemaciclib + LY3023414; abemaciclib + galunisertib; SOC (gemcitabine or capecitabine) Stage 1: DCR; Stage 2: PFS DCR: 15.2% (abemaciclib mono), 12.1% (+ LY3023414), 36.4% (SOC); median PFS 1.7, 1.8, and 3.3 mo respectively; no arms advanced to Stage 2
PRODIGE 24 / CCTG PA6 Phase III, open-label, randomized (n=493; 1:1; 77 hospitals, France & Canada) Histologically confirmed PDAC; R0/R1 resection 3–12 weeks prior Modified FOLFIRINOX (24 weeks) vs. gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² (24 weeks) Disease-free survival (DFS) Median DFS 21.4 vs. 12.8 mo (HR 0.66; p<0.001); 5-year DFS 26.1% vs. 19.0%; median OS 53.5 vs. 35.5 mo (HR 0.68; p=0.001); 5-year OS 43.2% vs. 31.4%
MORPHEUS-PDAC Phase Ib/II, open-label, randomized umbrella study Advanced, pretreated PDAC (2L and 3L settings) Atezolizumab + motixafortide, cobimetinib, or simlukafusp alfa (q2w/q3w) vs. mFOLFOX6 or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (control) ORR per RECIST 1.1; safety ORR: 7.1% (atezo + simlukafusp q2w, 2L); 8.7% (mFOLFOX6, 2L); 14.3% (atezo + cobimetinib, 3L); 16.7% (atezo + simlukafusp q3w, 3L); 0% in remaining arms

ELI-002 7P: A New Immunotherapy Front in Resectable PDAC

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most challenging cancers to treat, with limited surgical eligibility and modest benefits from chemotherapy. For patients with resectable or borderline resectable disease, improving the chances of a complete surgical removal (R0 resection) and extending long-term survival are paramount. This is where neoadjuvant therapy, administered before surgery, plays a crucial role.

The initiation of a Phase 1 study for ELI-002 7P in this neoadjuvant setting represents a strategic move to address this high unmet need. ELI-002 is an amphiphile vaccine designed to target common KRAS mutations, which are key drivers in PDAC. Prior research with an earlier version, ELI-002 2P, demonstrated its ability to induce robust, persistent mKRAS-specific T cell responses and even antigen spreading, with these immune responses correlating with improved clinical outcomes in patients with minimal residual disease. This suggests a promising mechanism of action for stimulating the immune system against tumor cells.

However, the literature also highlights the challenges of cancer vaccine monotherapy in PDAC, often failing to outperform traditional treatments. This new study wisely incorporates a combination approach, pairing the mKRAS-specific vaccine with chemotherapy and an anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor. This multi-modal strategy is critical, as studies indicate that combining vaccines with immune checkpoint blockade is necessary to overcome the immune escape mechanisms prevalent in PDAC and enhance overall therapeutic responses. This approach aims to leverage the strengths of each modality: chemotherapy to reduce tumor burden, the vaccine to prime specific anti-tumor immunity, and the checkpoint inhibitor to release immune brakes.

While this Phase 1 study is small, its findings will be crucial. The primary risks include whether the observed immunologic responses translate into tangible improvements in R0 resection rates and long-term survival in this specific neoadjuvant population. Furthermore, the preliminary nature of a small Phase 1 trial means that even positive results will require extensive validation in larger, more diverse patient cohorts. Nevertheless, this trial signifies a significant step forward in exploring advanced immunotherapy combinations for a notoriously difficult cancer, potentially paving the way for more effective multidisciplinary approaches.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Eli 002?
ELI-002 is a therapeutic cancer vaccine developed by ELI Vax (now part of ABL Bio) designed to target specific KRAS G12D and G12R mutations. It utilizes a lipid-nanoparticle (LNP) platform to deliver modified peptides, aiming to elicit robust T-cell responses against these common oncogenic drivers. The vaccine is currently undergoing Phase 1/2 clinical trials for patients with KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer and other solid tumors. Its mechanism focuses on preventing recurrence and improving outcomes in patients with minimal residual disease.
Is pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma curable?
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is rarely curable, primarily due to its aggressive biology and late-stage diagnosis in most patients. Curability is generally limited to a small subset of patients with early-stage, resectable disease who undergo complete surgical resection (R0). Even after successful surgery, recurrence rates remain high, underscoring the need for effective adjuvant therapies and early detection strategies.
What is the 5-year survival rate for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
The overall 5-year survival rate for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is approximately 12-13%. This low figure is primarily due to the disease often being diagnosed at advanced stages, where curative surgical resection is no longer feasible. Survival rates vary significantly based on the stage at diagnosis, with localized disease having a more favorable, though still challenging, prognosis compared to regional or distant metastatic disease.
What are the characteristics of stage 2 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?
Stage 2 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is defined by a primary tumor that is either larger than 4 cm or invades adjacent structures like the duodenum, common bile duct, or peripancreatic soft tissue (T3). This stage also includes tumors of any T1-T3 size with involvement of 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes (N1). Crucially, in both Stage IIA (T3 N0 M0) and Stage IIB (Any T1-T3 N1 M0), there is no evidence of distant metastasis.
What new treatments for pancreatic cancer are expected in 2026?
Expected new treatments for pancreatic cancer in 2026 are likely to include advanced KRAS inhibitors, particularly pan-KRAS selective agents such as Revolution Medicines' RMC-6236, which are demonstrating promising early clinical activity. These therapies aim to address the high prevalence of KRAS mutations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Additionally, novel combination strategies integrating immunotherapies with targeted agents or chemotherapy are anticipated to emerge, potentially improving outcomes for specific patient populations.
What are the newest treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma?
Newest treatments for pancreatic adenocarcinoma are increasingly driven by molecular profiling, identifying actionable targets beyond standard chemotherapy. Targeted therapies, including KRAS G12C inhibitors and PARP inhibitors for BRCA-mutated disease, are expanding options for specific patient subsets. Emerging therapeutic classes like antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and novel immunotherapy combinations are also under active investigation in clinical trials.
What is the 5-year survival rate for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?
The 5-year survival rate for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is approximately 12% across all stages. This rate varies significantly based on the stage at diagnosis, with localized disease having a higher survival rate compared to regional or distant metastatic disease.
What are the treatment options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?
Treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily involves surgical resection for resectable disease, often followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. For locally advanced or metastatic disease, systemic chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel are standard, sometimes combined with radiation therapy for local control. Emerging targeted therapies and immunotherapies are also being explored, particularly for patients with specific molecular alterations.

References

  1. [1] Liu J, Mroczek M et al.. Genetics, Genomics and Emerging Molecular Therapies of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers. 2023 Jan 27. 36765737
  2. [2] Li KY, Yuan JL et al.. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma immune microenvironment and immunotherapy prospects. Chronic diseases and translational medicine. 2020 Mar. 32226930
  3. [3] Chick RC, Pawlik TM. Updates in Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024 Oct 26. 39518557
  4. [4] Botta GP, Huynh TR et al.. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy outcomes in borderline-resectable and locally-advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Cancer medicine. 2023 Apr. 36478411
  5. [5] Bouchart C, Navez J et al.. Preoperative treatment with mFOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel +/- isotoxic high-dose stereotactic body Radiation Therapy (iHD-SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (the STEREOPAC trial): study protocol for a randomised comparative multicenter phase II trial. BMC cancer. 2023 Sep 21. 37735634
  6. [6] Wang Y, Kong F et al.. Defining homologous recombination deficiency status in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Clinical implications for evaluating response to platinum chemotherapy. Drug resistance updates : reviews and commentaries in antimicrobial and anticancer chemotherapy. 2025 Nov. 40845482
  7. [7] Jain A, Goel V et al.. Comparative Efficacy and Toxicity of Modified FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel in Advanced Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Retrospective Analysis. Cureus. 2025 Jul. 40772207
  8. [8] Jiang B, Shang Y et al.. The prognostic and predictive value of homologous recombination deficiency in gastrointestinal cancer. The oncologist. 2025 Jun 4. 40515474
  9. [9] Roehrle J, Kasper S et al.. Clinical Outcome and Treatment Sequences of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Contemporary Chemotherapy Protocols. Oncology research and treatment. 2023. 36720216
  10. [10] McMillan MT, Soares KC. Advances in Vaccine-Based Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer. 2025 Feb 12. 39939414
  11. [11] Fujisawa T, Tsuchiya T et al.. STNM01, the RNA oligonucleotide targeting carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15, as second-line therapy for chemotherapy-refractory patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: An open label, phase I/IIa trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Jan. 36425867
  12. [12] Li J, Deng T et al.. Efficacy and safety of glecirasib in solid tumors with KRAS G12C mutation: A pooled analysis of two phase I/II trials. Cancer communications (London, England). 2025 Nov. 41037823
  13. [13] Holyoake DLP, Warren DR et al.. Stomach Dose-Volume Predicts Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)). 2018 Jul. 29602584
  14. [14] Huang C, Cheng CS et al.. Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy. BMC cancer. 2024 Aug 2. 39095759
  15. [15] van Roessel S, van Veldhuisen E et al.. Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Resected Pancreatic Cancer After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Treatment. JAMA oncology. 2020 Nov 1. 32910170
  16. [16] Chiorean EG, Picozzi V et al.. Efficacy and safety of abemaciclib alone and with PI3K/mTOR inhibitor LY3023414 or galunisertib versus chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A randomized controlled trial. Cancer medicine. 2023 Oct. 37840530
  17. [17] Manji GA, Chung V et al.. Atezolizumab and motixafortide, cobimetinib or simlukafusp alfa in pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer: phase I/IIb MORPHEUS-PDAC umbrella study. The oncologist. 2026 Mar 9. 41741368
  18. [18] Yamamoto T, Fujii T et al.. Randomized phase III trial of intravenous and intraperitoneal paclitaxel with S-1 versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastasis (SP study). Trials. 2022 Feb 5. 35123553
  19. [19] Ettrich TJ, Berger AW et al.. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant or only adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for resectable pancreatic cancer - the NEONAX trial (AIO-PAK-0313), a prospective, randomized, controlled, phase II study of the AIO pancreatic cancer group. BMC cancer. 2018 Dec 29. 30594153
  20. [20] Conroy T, Castan F et al.. Five-Year Outcomes of FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology. 2022 Nov 1. 36048453

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts