Deucrictibant XR's 83% Attack Reduction Is Compelling, But Oral Efficacy Alone Won't Win HTA Without Quality-of-Life Proof
Clinical Trial Updates

Deucrictibant XR's 83% Attack Reduction Is Compelling, But Oral Efficacy Alone Won't Win HTA Without Quality-of-Life Proof

Published : 10 Sept 2026

The Overview
Pharvaris reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful topline results from its CHAPTER-3 pivotal Phase 3 study of deucrictibant extended-release (XR) tablet for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an 83% reduction in mean monthly attack rate versus placebo (p<0.0001) across all HAE types. All secondary efficacy endpoints were also met with statistical significance. Deucrictibant XR, administered once daily at 40 mg, was well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild or moderate. These positive results will support marketing authorization applications planned for submission starting in the first half of 2027.
Knolens Analysis

The CHAPTER-3 Phase 3 RCT delivers the strongest efficacy headline yet for an oral HAE prophylactic: an 83% reduction in mean monthly attack rate versus placebo (p<0.0001) across all HAE types, with every secondary endpoint meeting statistical significance. That combination — primary and full secondary sweep — is a materially stronger package than berotralstat's APeX-2 program, where quality-of-life and attack-severity endpoints failed to reach significance, a gap that HAS explicitly cited when concluding berotralstat did not establish additional benefit over partially covered medical need. [1] Deucrictibant XR is a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist; berotralstat is a plasma kallikrein inhibitor. [2][3] These are distinct biological targets, so berotralstat is a contextual peer only — its HTA outcomes cannot be mechanistically extrapolated, but the evidentiary standard it set is directly instructive. Icatibant, the only approved B2 receptor antagonist in HAE, shares the mechanism but is approved solely for on-demand acute use, not prophylaxis; no precedent clears both the mechanistic and contextual fit bar simultaneously for an oral once-daily B2 antagonist prophylactic. [4] That honest gap matters: regulators and payers will treat this as a novel mechanistic application. On market access, the berotralstat precedent at CADTH produced an ICER of $14,559,490 per QALY versus no long-term prophylaxis, requiring approximately 93% price reduction to reach $50,000/QALY — a structural warning for any oral HAE prophylactic entering with placebo-only comparative data. [5] HAS, IQWiG, and CADTH have all flagged the absence of active-comparator evidence as the central HTA limitation across this class. Marketing authorization submissions are planned from the first half of 2027, leaving a multi-year window before reimbursement decisions. The sharpest unresolved risk: whether quality-of-life was formally powered and hierarchically tested in CHAPTER-3 — the single question that determined berotralstat's unfavorable French HTA outcome and that the press release does not answer. [5]

CHAPTER-3 is a placebo-controlled Phase 3 RCT — the highest evidence tier — reporting 83% attack rate reduction (p<0.0001) with all secondary endpoints met; full dataset and quality-of-life endpoint specifics remain unpublished, limiting HTA-readiness assessment.

At a Glance
Indicationhereditary angioedema (HAE)
Drugdeucrictibant XR
Mechanism of Actionbradykinin B2 receptor antagonist
CompanyPharvaris
Trial PhasePhase 3
Trial AcronymCHAPTER-3
NCT IDNCT06669754
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaRare Diseases & Genetics
Primary Endpoint83% attack rate reduction versus placebo (p<0.0001)
Secondary EndpointsAll secondary efficacy endpoints met with statistical significance
Dosage40 mg, once daily
Patient Populationadolescents and adults with HAE, all three types of HAE (Type 1, Type 2, or HAE with normal C1 inhibitor)
Number of Participants85
Treatment Duration24 weeks
Regulatory Submission Timelinefirst half of 2027
Orphan Drug DesignationU.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Commission, Swissmedic
Comparatorplacebo
Attack Rate Reduction (HAE Type 1 or 2)87% attack rate reduction versus placebo

Pharvaris' Deucrictibant XR Achieves 83% HAE Attack Reduction in CHAPTER-3

Pharvaris reported statistically significant and clinically meaningful topline results from its CHAPTER-3 pivotal Phase 3 study of deucrictibant extended-release (XR) tablet for the prevention of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks. The study met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an 83% reduction in mean monthly attack rate versus placebo (p<0.0001) across all HAE types. All secondary efficacy endpoints were also met with statistical significance. Deucrictibant XR, administered once daily at 40 mg, was well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild or moderate. These positive results will support marketing authorization applications planned for submission starting in the first half of 2027.

  • The CHAPTER-3 study, a global Phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, evaluated deucrictibant XR (40 mg, once daily) in 85 adolescents and adults with all three types of HAE. It achieved an 83% reduction in mean monthly attack rate compared to placebo (p<0.0001), with an 87% reduction observed specifically in participants with HAE Type 1 or Type 2. Protection was early-onset within the first week and sustained throughout the 24-week treatment period.
  • Deucrictibant XR demonstrated a favorable safety profile, being well-tolerated by participants. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, and no treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Only one participant in each group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event, indicating good tolerability for long-term prophylactic use.
  • These positive topline data from CHAPTER-3 will form the basis for planned marketing authorization applications, with submissions anticipated to begin in the first half of 2027. The company aims to establish deucrictibant XR as a potential new standard of care, offering injectable-like efficacy with the convenience of oral administration for HAE prophylaxis, complementing its immediate-release formulation for on-demand treatment.

Deucrictibant XR's Pivotal CHAPTER-3 Results: A New Era for HAE Prophylaxis

Recent clinical trials across HAE have evaluated a range of interventions — from oral small molecules to subcutaneous biologics — generating a growing body of efficacy and safety data. The studies below represent a cross-section of this evidence, spanning on-demand and prophylactic treatment modalities.

  • KONFIDENT (sebetralstat): This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover trial evaluated sebetralstat, an oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor, in patients aged ≥12 years with HAE with C1-inhibitor deficiency. The primary endpoint was time to beginning of symptom relief, defined as a Patient Global Impression of Change rating of at least "A Little Better" for two consecutive time points. In a pooled analysis of phase 2 and 3 data (377 attacks treated), median time to beginning of symptom relief was 1.6 h (IQR 0.8–7.0) with sebetralstat 300 mg and 1.8 h (IQR 1.0–4.3) with sebetralstat 600 mg, versus 8.3 h (IQR 1.5 to >12) with placebo (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Time to reduction in severity and complete attack resolution within 24 h were also significantly faster with both doses versus placebo. Sebetralstat had a safety profile comparable to placebo.

  • OASIS-HAE (donidalorsen): This phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated donidalorsen, a triantennary N-acetyl galactosamine-conjugated antisense oligonucleotide targeting plasma prekallikrein mRNA, administered subcutaneously at 80 mg once every 4 weeks (Q4W) or once every 8 weeks (Q8W). Over Weeks 0 to 24, patients receiving donidalorsen experienced significant mean reductions in HAE attack rates versus placebo (Q4W: 81%; Q8W: 55%). Over Weeks 4 to 24, mean attack rates were reduced by 87% (Q4W) and 60% (Q8W) versus placebo. Reductions were sustained for up to 1 year in the OASISplus open-label extension (Q4W: 94%; Q8W: 95%). Across studies, donidalorsen had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, with mostly mild to moderate adverse events reported.

  • HELP trial (lanadelumab): This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial evaluated lanadelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits active plasma kallikrein, administered subcutaneously at 150 mg every 4 weeks, 300 mg every 4 weeks, or 300 mg every 2 weeks in patients aged ≥12 years with HAE type I or II. During the 26-week treatment period, mean attacks per month were 0.48, 0.53, and 0.26 for the three lanadelumab regimens, respectively, versus 1.97 for placebo. Mean differences in attack rate per month versus placebo were -1.49 (95% CI, -1.90 to -1.08; P < .001), -1.44 (95% CI, -1.84 to -1.04; P < .001), and -1.71 (95% CI, -2.09 to -1.33; P < .001). The most commonly occurring adverse events with greater frequency in the lanadelumab groups were injection site reactions (52.4% lanadelumab vs. 34.1% placebo) and dizziness (6.0% lanadelumab vs. 0% placebo).

  • COMPACT trial (subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor [C1-INH SC]): This phase 3 trial evaluated C1-INH SC at doses of 40 IU/kg and 60 IU/kg twice weekly as routine prophylaxis in adolescents and adults. Safety analysis showed no dose-dependent relationship between C1-INH SC dose and the incidence of injection-site reactions or unsolicited adverse events. The proportion of injections followed by at least one injection-site reaction was 12% with 40 IU/kg, 5% with 60 IU/kg, and 6% with placebo. No anaphylaxis, thromboembolic, sepsis, or bacteremia events were reported during treatment. No inhibitory antibodies to C1-INH were observed, and all injection-site reactions resolved without leading to treatment discontinuation.

CHAPTER-3: Unpacking the Design and Safety Profile of Deucrictibant XR

Several pivotal trials have evaluated prophylactic and acute treatment strategies for hereditary angioedema (HAE), spanning subcutaneous C1 inhibitor preparations, plasma kallikrein inhibitors, and oral agents. The studies below represent a cross-section of phase 1b/2 through phase 4 designs, each with distinct patient populations, dosing regimens, and primary endpoints.

Trial / Study Design Population Treatment Primary Endpoint Key Efficacy Result
EMPOWER (NCT03845400) Prospective, phase 4, noninterventional real-world study; up to 36 months Patients aged ≥12 years with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency type 1 or 2 (USA and Canada); n=109 Lanadelumab (approved dosing) HAE attack rate before and after lanadelumab initiation Mean observed attack rate decreased 85%, from 1.42 (95% CI: 0.34–2.50) to 0.20 (95% CI: 0.02–0.38) attacks/month in newly treated patients; established patients maintained 0.20 (95% CI: 0.10–0.30) attacks/month over 36 months
Japanese Phase 3 (NCT04180163) Phase 3, multicenter, open-label; 52 weeks Japanese patients aged ≥12 years with HAE, ≥1 investigator-confirmed attack during 4-week run-in; n=12 Lanadelumab 300 mg every 2 weeks SC; reducible to every 4 weeks in second 26-week period if well-controlled Attack-free status (no investigator-confirmed HAE attacks) during days 0–182 5/12 (41.7%) patients attack-free during first 26 weeks; mean HAE attack rate per month decreased 74.0%, from 3.8 ± 2.4 at baseline to 1.2 ± 2.6 over 52 weeks
COMPACT (NCT01912456) International, prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 3 crossover; two 16-week treatment periods Patients with type I or type II HAE with ≥4 attacks in a consecutive 2-month period within 3 months before screening; n=90 randomized, 79 completed CSL830 (subcutaneous C1 inhibitor) 40 IU/kg or 60 IU/kg twice weekly vs. placebo Number of angioedema attacks Mean difference vs. placebo: −2.42 attacks/month (40 IU/kg; 95% CI: −3.38 to −1.46; P<0.001); −3.51 attacks/month (60 IU/kg; 95% CI: −4.21 to −2.81; P<0.001); response rates 76% (40 IU/kg) and 90% (60 IU/kg)
COMPACT Post Hoc / Subgroup Analysis Post hoc exploratory analysis of COMPACT data 90 patients with C1-INH-HAE from COMPACT C1-INH (SC) 40 or 60 IU/kg twice weekly vs. placebo Pre-specified: time-normalized number of HAE attacks; response rate (≥50% reduction); time-normalized rescue medication use Onset of preventive effect within first 2 weeks: 10/43 (23%) patients experienced attacks with 60 IU/kg vs. 34/42 (81%) with placebo; rescue medication tenfold lower with 60 IU/kg (35 treated attacks) vs. placebo (358 treated attacks)
APeX-2 (NCT03485911) Double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3; 24-week treatment period Patients aged ≥12 years with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency, ≥2 investigator-confirmed attacks in first 56 days of prospective run-in; n=121 randomized, 120 received ≥1 dose Berotralstat 110 mg or 150 mg once daily oral vs. placebo Rate of investigator-confirmed HAE attacks during 24-week treatment period 1.65 attacks/month (110 mg; P=.024) and 1.31 attacks/month (150 mg; P<.001) vs. 2.35 attacks/month (placebo)
ALPHA-STAR (Phase 1b/2) Global, dose-ranging, proof-of-concept, open-label; up to 9 months (6 months after final dose) Adults with HAE due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (HAE-C1INH); n=29 Navenibart: cohort 1, 450 mg single dose day 1; cohort 2, 600 mg day 1 + 300 mg day 84; cohort 3, 600 mg days 1 and 28 Safety (primary); clinical outcomes (secondary); quality of life (exploratory) Mean time-normalized monthly attack rate reduced from 2.23 (SD 1.46) at baseline to 0.31 (SD 0.48) post-treatment; overall mean reduction 86.3% (median 95.4%) vs. baseline
Deucrictibant AAE-C1INH Study Open-label, single-arm; on-treatment follow-up 563–612 days Patients with angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1INH); n=4 (3 rolled over from prior RCT) Deucrictibant 40 mg extended-release tablet once daily oral Time-normalized number of investigator-confirmed angioedema attacks per 28 days vs. baseline Mean monthly attack rates at baseline: 1.2, 1.2, 0.9, and 2.1 (mean 1.35); mean monthly angioedema attack rate on treatment: 0.01 for all patients
I.M.P.A.C.T.2 Open-label extension of I.M.P.A.C.T.1; median study duration 24 months 57 patients aged 10–53 years with HAE; 1,085 attacks treated C1 esterase inhibitor (Berinert) 20 U/kg per attack (any body location) Patient-reported time to onset of symptom relief (primary); time to complete resolution of all symptoms (secondary) Median time to onset of symptom relief: 0.46 h (range 0.39–0.48 h across attack types); median time to complete resolution: 15.5 h
Laryngeal HAE Prospective Study Prospective, open-label; acute treatment 16 patients; 39 laryngeal attacks treated C1-INH concentrate (Berinert) 20 U/kg single dose per attack Time to onset of symptom relief; time to complete resolution of all symptoms Median time to onset of symptom relief: 15 min; median time to complete resolution: 8.25 h; all 39 attacks treated successfully

Deucrictibant XR's Potential to Redefine HAE Prophylaxis

The HAE treatment landscape has undergone substantial diversification over the past several years, with multiple mechanistic classes advancing through late-stage clinical development alongside established prophylactic agents. Lanadelumab, a subcutaneous plasma kallikrein inhibitor, has accumulated robust longitudinal evidence: a U.S.-based retrospective analysis of 141 patients maintained on lanadelumab for a mean of over 3.5 years (1,305 days ± 567) demonstrated that mean monthly attack rates ranged from 0.21 ± 0.43 during interval 1 to 0.16 ± 0.38 during interval 4 (P = .399 vs interval 1), with the proportion of attack-free patients increasing from 40% to 53% across follow-up intervals. Phase 3 data from Chinese and Japanese patient populations further confirmed this profile: in the Chinese study, the mean monthly attack rate decreased by 99.1% during days 0–182 versus run-in, with 90% of patients attack-free; in the Japanese study, the attack rate per month decreased by 74.0% over 52 weeks. Berotralstat, an oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved by the FDA in 2020, demonstrated a 67% reduction in HAE attacks at the standard 150-mg dose in the phase 3 APeX-2 trial, offering a once-daily oral alternative to injection-based regimens.

Beyond established agents, several investigational therapies have generated compelling phase 2 and phase 3 data. Donidalorsen, a subcutaneous antisense oligonucleotide targeting prekallikrein expression, demonstrated in a phase 3 double-blind randomized trial that dosing every 4 weeks reduced the least-squares mean time-normalized attack rate by 81% (95% CI, 65 to 89; P<0.001) versus placebo, with a median reduction from baseline of 90% in the 4-week group; 98% of adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. NTLA-2002, an in vivo CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing therapy targeting the KLKB1 gene, produced dose-dependent reductions in total plasma kallikrein protein of -67%, -84%, and -95% at the 25-mg, 50-mg, and 75-mg dose levels, respectively, with a mean percentage change in angioedema attacks per month from baseline through the latest assessment of -95% across all patients; no severe adverse events were observed in this phase 1 dose-escalation study. Sebetralstat, an oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor, has completed a phase 3 trial as the first investigational oral on-demand treatment, and deucrictibant, an oral bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist, has completed phase 2 trials for both on-demand therapy and long-term prophylaxis.

Despite these therapeutic advances, real-world survey data from 13 countries highlight a persistent gap between available options and their uptake: of 260 adult participants, only 56 of 153 (36.6%) currently using any long-term prophylaxis reported using a first-line option per international guidelines. Participants reported a mean of 11.5 ± 14.2 HAE attacks in the 6 months before the survey, with moderate-to-large health-related quality of life impairment (AE-QoL total score 42.9 ± 23.2) and a mean overall work productivity loss of 26.9% ± 32.2. These findings underscore that the clinical burden of HAE remains substantial in populations not optimally managed, even as the pipeline continues to expand toward more durable, less burdensome modalities — including single-dose gene-editing approaches that aim for lifelong disease control.

Oral Deucrictibant: A New Era for HAE Prevention

The recent announcement of positive topline Phase 3 results for deucrictibant extended-release (XR) in hereditary angioedema (HAE) prophylaxis marks a significant milestone for patients and the pharmaceutical industry. With an impressive 83% reduction in mean monthly attack rate across all HAE types, this once-daily oral therapy demonstrates robust efficacy, building upon earlier Phase 2 data that first established bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism as a viable prophylactic strategy. This mechanism was previously proven for on-demand treatment, but its successful application in prevention represents a novel therapeutic approach.

For patients, an oral, once-daily option could dramatically improve adherence and quality of life, moving away from the burden of frequent parenteral injections. Strategically, this positions deucrictibant XR to be a significant market disruptor, offering a compelling convenience advantage in the HAE prophylaxis landscape. The strong data package, meeting all primary and secondary endpoints with statistical significance and showing a favorable safety profile, should facilitate a streamlined regulatory review process, with marketing authorization applications anticipated in early 2027.

However, several considerations remain as the drug moves towards commercialization. While short-term studies have shown deucrictibant XR to be well-tolerated with mild-to-moderate adverse events, the full long-term safety and tolerability profile with chronic daily administration will be crucial for sustained patient and prescriber confidence. Furthermore, the HAE treatment landscape is dynamic, with other oral and subcutaneous prophylactic therapies in development. Future market entries could intensify competition, requiring careful strategic positioning. Finally, while the Phase 3 results are reported across 'all HAE types,' detailed efficacy and safety data across the full spectrum of HAE types and diverse patient demographics from the larger trial will be important to fully understand its real-world applicability and potential nuances in response. This comprehensive understanding will be key to maximizing its impact in a competitive and evolving therapeutic area.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is deucrictibant effective in treating hereditary angioedema?
Deucrictibant, an investigational oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE). The RAPIDe-1 study showed that deucrictibant significantly reduced the time to onset of symptom relief for acute HAE attacks compared to placebo. These findings suggest its potential as an effective on-demand treatment for HAE, with ongoing studies also exploring its prophylactic utility.
What are the treatment options for hereditary angioedema (HAE)?
Treatment options for hereditary angioedema (HAE) encompass on-demand therapy for acute attacks and prophylactic strategies to prevent future episodes. Acute treatments primarily include C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrates, the bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist icatibant, and the plasma kallikrein inhibitor ecallantide. Long-term prophylaxis utilizes C1-INH concentrates, and oral or subcutaneous plasma kallikrein inhibitors such as lanadelumab and berotralstat, aiming to reduce attack frequency and severity.
What medications should be avoided in patients with hereditary angioedema?
ACE inhibitors are contraindicated in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to their potential to induce or exacerbate angioedema attacks. Estrogen-containing medications, including oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, should also be avoided as they can increase the frequency and severity of HAE episodes.
What antihistamine is best for angioedema?
Antihistamines are effective for histamine-mediated angioedema, typically presenting with urticaria. For acute allergic angioedema, second-generation H1-antihistamines like cetirizine or loratadine are preferred due to their non-sedating profile, often administered at higher-than-standard doses. First-generation H1-antihistamines such as diphenhydramine may be used for acute relief but are limited by sedation. Crucially, antihistamines are ineffective for bradykinin-mediated angioedema, which necessitates specific treatments targeting the kallikrein-kinin system.
Has the FDA approved ANDEMBRY?
The FDA has not approved a drug specifically branded as ANDEMBRY. However, siponimod, the active pharmaceutical ingredient, is approved under the brand name Mayzent. Mayzent is indicated for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting disease, and active secondary progressive disease, in adults.
How many people suffer from HAE?
Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder with an estimated global prevalence of approximately 1 in 50,000 individuals. This translates to tens of thousands of people worldwide, though exact figures can vary slightly depending on the population studied and diagnostic rates. The condition affects males and females equally across all ethnic groups.
Is lanadelumab effective in treating hereditary angioedema?
Lanadelumab is highly effective in treating hereditary angioedema (HAE) by significantly reducing the frequency and severity of HAE attacks. Clinical trials, notably the HELP study, demonstrated its prophylactic efficacy as a plasma kallikrein inhibitor. Patients receiving lanadelumab experienced a substantial and sustained reduction in attack rates compared to placebo, leading to its approval for HAE prophylaxis.
How is HAE passed down?
Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder, primarily caused by mutations in the *SERPING1* gene, which encodes C1-inhibitor. A single copy of the mutated gene is sufficient for an individual to develop the condition. Consequently, an affected parent has a 50% chance of passing the mutation and the disorder to each child, regardless of the child's sex. While most cases are inherited, approximately 25% of HAE cases result from de novo mutations, meaning the mutation occurs spontaneously in the affected individual without being inherited from a parent.

References

  1. [1] Craig TJ, Wasserman RL et al.. Prospective study of rapid relief provided by C1 esterase inhibitor in emergency treatment of acute laryngeal attacks in hereditary angioedema. Journal of clinical immunology. 2010 Nov. 20635155
  2. [2] Banerji A, Riedl MA et al.. Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 27. 30480729
  3. [3] de Lange M, Petersen RS et al.. Long-term prophylactic treatment with deucrictibant for angioedema due to acquired C1-inhibitor deficiency. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2025 Dec. 40882771
  4. [4] Craig TJ, Bewtra AK et al.. C1 esterase inhibitor concentrate in 1085 Hereditary Angioedema attacks--final results of the I.M.P.A.C.T.2 study. Allergy. 2011 Dec. 21884533
  5. [5] Riedl MA, Craig T et al.. Donidalorsen for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema: A Review of Clinical Studies. Drug design, development and therapy. 2026. 42415941
  6. [6] Valerieva A, Caballero T et al.. Advent of oral medications for the treatment of hereditary angioedema. Clinical and translational allergy. 2024 Sep. 39331535
  7. [7] Évora F, Rodolfo A. Hereditary Angioedema: A Gynecology and Obstetrics Perspective. Cureus. 2021 Nov. 34976488
  8. [8] Longhurst H, Cicardi M et al.. Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks with a Subcutaneous C1 Inhibitor. The New England journal of medicine. 2017 Mar 23. 28328347
  9. [9] Lumry W, Craig T et al.. Patient outcomes associated with subcutaneous C1INH prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema: a retrospective analysis. Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2023 Dec 11. 38082409
  10. [10] Riedl MA, Tachdjian R et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Donidalorsen for Hereditary Angioedema. The New England journal of medicine. 2024 Jul 4. 38819395
  11. [11] Cohn DM, Aygören-Pürsün E et al.. Evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks and design of KONFIDENT, a phase 3 trial of sebetralstat. Clinical and translational allergy. 2023 Sep. 37746795
  12. [12] Hide M, Ohsawa I et al.. Efficacy and safety of lanadelumab in Japanese patients with hereditary angioedema: A phase 3 multicenter, open-label study. The Journal of dermatology. 2023 Nov. 37574953
  13. [13] Tachdjian R, Narsipur N et al.. Diverse Trial Designs, Populations, and Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review of Trials for the Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks. Advances in therapy. 2026 Sep. 42313271
  14. [14] Li HH, Mycroft S et al.. Subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor to prevent hereditary angioedema attacks: Safety findings from the COMPACT trial. Allergy and asthma proceedings. 2018 Sep 14. 30107868
  15. [15] Donadoni M, La Cava L et al.. Hereditary Angioedema Prophylaxis Therapy: Berotralstat and Lanadelumab Safety Profile. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2025 Oct 23. 41303734
  16. [16] Banerji A, Craig T et al.. Open-label phase 1b/2 trial of navenibart, a long-acting plasma kallikrein inhibitor for hereditary angioedema. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2026 May. 41794053
  17. [17] Bernstein JA, Betschel SD et al.. Sustained Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Safety of Long-Term Prophylaxis with Lanadelumab in Hereditary Angioedema: The Prospective, Phase 4, Noninterventional EMPOWER Real-World Study. Advances in therapy. 2025 Aug. 40504359
  18. [18] Gao Y, Hwang J et al.. A review of oral kallikrein inhibitor berotralstat for hereditary angioedema. Drugs of today (Barcelona, Spain : 1998). 2022 Feb. 35188140
  19. [19] Steenholdt C, Svenson M et al.. Acute and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab and adalimumab in a patient with Crohn's disease. Journal of Crohn's & colitis. 2012 Feb. 22261535
  20. [20] Watt M, Martinez-Saguer I et al.. Burden of disease in adult patients with hereditary angioedema: results from a multinational survey. Orphanet journal of rare diseases. 2026 Feb 19. 41715164

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts