Randomized Phase 3 KEYNOTE-C93 delivers the first chemotherapy-free win in mismatch repair deficient advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, with pembrolizumab monotherapy cutting progression or death risk by 43% and stretching median progression-free survival to 38.2 months versus 8.4 months for platinum doublet chemotherapy. The result directly confronts category 1 chemo-immunotherapy standards built on Phase 3 RUBY with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, DUO-E with durvalumab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, and NRG-GY018/KEYNOTE-868 with pembrolizumab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel, all of which retained chemotherapy and reported immature overall survival with 19.2 to 24.8 months follow-up. [1][2] Payer precedent tempers enthusiasm, with prior pembrolizumab combinations requiring price reductions to meet a $50,000 per QALY threshold after an ICER of $57,344 per QALY, and lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab facing a €197,645 per QALY ICER under treatment waning versus an €80,000 threshold with at least 65% discount. [1][3] Regulatory precedent supports biomarker-restricted review, anchored in reimbursement with conditions for pembrolizumab monotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer after platinum on single-arm KEYNOTE-158 data with median overall survival of 65.4 months, yet KEYNOTE-C93 discloses progression-free survival only with no overall survival, response rate, safety or quality-of-life package. [4] Without survival maturity the de-escalation thesis remains unproven against triplets that payers already deem clinically equivalent. [1]
Phase 3 RCT PFS HR=0.57 with 38.2 vs 8.4 months, but no OS, safety or QoL disclosed to support chemo-free displacement.
| Indication | Advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) tumors |
| Drug | Pembrolizumab |
| Mechanism of Action | PD-1 inhibitor |
| Company | Merck |
| Trial Phase | Phase 3 |
| Trial Acronym | KEYNOTE-C93 |
| NCT ID | NCT05173987 |
| Category | Clinical Trial Event |
| Sub Category | Topline Results Positive |
| Therapeutic Area | Oncology |
| Primary Endpoints | Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) |
| Secondary Endpoint | Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
| Patient Population | dMMR advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients who had not previously received systemic chemotherapy or experienced recurrence after prior adjuvant therapy |
| Comparator Arm | Platinum doublet chemotherapy (carboplatin plus paclitaxel) |
| PFS Risk Reduction | 43% |
| Median PFS (KEYTRUDA) | 38.2 months |
| Median PFS (Chemotherapy) | 8.4 months |
| Hazard Ratio (PFS) | 0.57 |
| P-value (PFS) | 0.0002 |
| Conference Presentation | European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2026, Presidential Symposium |
KEYTRUDA Monotherapy Significantly Improves PFS in dMMR Endometrial Cancer
Merck announced positive Phase 3 KEYNOTE-C93 trial results for KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab) monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. The study demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), reducing the risk of disease progression or death by 43% (HR=0.57; p=0.0002) compared to platinum doublet chemotherapy. Patients treated with KEYTRUDA achieved a median PFS of 38.2 months, significantly longer than the 8.4 months for chemotherapy. These findings, presented at ESMO Congress 2026 and published in The Lancet, highlight KEYTRUDA's potential as a chemotherapy-free option for this patient population.
- The KEYNOTE-C93 trial showed that KEYTRUDA monotherapy significantly reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 43% (HR=0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.79; p=0.0002) in dMMR advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer patients. This led to a median progression-free survival of 38.2 months for KEYTRUDA, a substantial increase compared to 8.4 months for platinum doublet chemotherapy, marking a significant advancement in treatment options.
- While the trial is ongoing for overall survival (OS), a favorable trend was observed for KEYTRUDA monotherapy (HR=0.77; p=0.1000), with 36-month OS rates of 70.7% versus 62.0% for chemotherapy. Importantly, KEYTRUDA's safety profile was consistent with previous studies, and Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were significantly lower (18.1%) compared to chemotherapy (50.7%), suggesting a better tolerability profile.
- KEYTRUDA monotherapy achieved a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) of 64.1%, comparable to chemotherapy's 62.1%. However, among responders, the median duration of response (DOR) for KEYTRUDA was not reached, indicating a more durable response, in contrast to 10.2 months for chemotherapy. The 36-month DOR rate was 70.7% for KEYTRUDA versus 40.0% for chemotherapy, highlighting long-term benefit.
Why New Options are Crucial for Advanced dMMR Endometrial Cancer
Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy face a poor prognosis, and treatment options have historically been limited. Patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer who experience progression following platinum-based chemotherapy have limited treatment options.
Historically limited post-platinum options have defined care, with active systemic therapy needed to prolong survival and improve disease control after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between 2013 and 2024.
Acquired resistance to PD-1 monotherapy can emerge, including a reported case of recurrent microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer that acquired resistance to pembrolizumab but favorably responded to the lenvatinib and pembrolizumab combination therapy.
For dostarlimab, its efficacy in other cancer subtypes, the development of resistance to monotherapy, and efficacy and safety in combination with other immunotherapeutic drugs have not yet been studied.
Toxicity limits continued therapy for some patients, with treatment discontinued due to toxicity in 4.7% of patients in real-world practice, while anemia (3 of 104 [2.9%]), colitis (2 of 104 [1.9%]), and diarrhea (2 of 104 [1.9%]) were the most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events.
Unpacking the Pivotal KEYNOTE-C93 Trial Data
Key trials in mismatch repair deficient advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer span single-arm phase I/II monotherapy studies and randomized phase 3 chemoimmunotherapy combinations. Designs differ in blinding, dosing schedules, and follow-up, while endpoints consistently center on response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety per RECIST v1.1.
| Trial | Design | Population | Regimen | Endpoints |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GARNET (NCT02715284) | Phase I, single-arm, open-label trial at 123 sites; cohorts A1 dMMR/MSI-H and A2 MMRp/MSS | Patients with advanced EC; 129 and 161 patients with advanced EC were enrolled in cohorts A1 and A2, respectively | Dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression | Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) per RECIST V.1.1, as assessed by blinded independent central review |
| RUBY (NCT03981796) | Phase 3, global, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial; 1:1 randomization; 494 patients who underwent randomization, 118 (23.9%) had mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors | Eligible patients with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent endometrial cancer | Dostarlimab (500 mg) or placebo, plus carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve, 5 mg per milliliter per minute) and paclitaxel (175 mg per square meter of body-surface area), every 3 weeks (six cycles), followed by dostarlimab (1000 mg) or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years | Primary end points were progression-free survival as assessed by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, and overall survival; safety was also assessed |
| KEYNOTE-158 (NCT02628067) | Phase 2 study; cohort D (advanced EC of any MSI/dMMR status) and cohort K (any MSI-H/dMMR advanced solid tumor, except colorectal) | Patients with MSI-H/dMMR (n = 94) and non-MSI-H/non-dMMR (n = 96) advanced EC | Pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≥35 cycles | Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by central review; secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety |
| POD1UM-101 cohort H | Phase I expansion cohort | Eligible patients (≥18 years; histologically proven/unresectable/recurrent, MSI-H/dMMR endometrial cancer; checkpoint inhibitor naive); 76 patients had received at least one retifanlimab dose | Retifanlimab 500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for ≤2 years | Primary endpoint was safety/tolerability |
| NRG GY018 (NCT03914612) | Phase 3 randomized trial; patients (n = 810) were randomized (1:1) | Women ≥18 years old with newly diagnosed stage III or IVA endometrial cancer with measurable disease, or stage IVB or recurrent endometrial cancer with or without measurable disease | Pembrolizumab or placebo plus paclitaxel-carboplatin followed by maintenance pembrolizumab or placebo for up to 24 months | Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) versus placebo plus chemotherapy; overall survival was a secondary endpoint and PFS per RECIST v.1.1 by blinded independent central review was an exploratory endpoint |
| Durvalumab ANZGOG1601 (ACTRN12617000106336, NCT03015129) | Multicenter nonrandomized phase 2 clinical trial | Women with AEC with pMMR tumor progressing after one to three lines of chemotherapy and women with AEC with dMMR tumor progressing after zero to three lines of chemotherapy; 35 dMMR and 36 pMMR recruited | Durvalumab 1500 mg given every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity | Primary endpoint was objective tumor response by RECIST V.1.1 modified for immune-based therapeutics |
| DORA (GEICO 120-R) | Multi-center, ambispective, observational real-world study within the Spanish Expanded Access Program; 129 patients from 57 of the Spanish Research Group for Gynaecological Cancer (GEICO) affiliated hospitals were enrolled, with 125 evaluable for radiological response | Patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer who had experienced tumor progression on or after a platinum-based treatment and had received at least 1 cycle of dostarlimab | Dostarlimab with median duration of dostarlimab administration was 8.8 months (interquartile range; 13.2) | Primary endpoints were objective response rate and duration of response |
Reshaping First-Line Treatment for dMMR Endometrial Cancer
In Part 1 of the phase III RUBY trial (NCT03981796) in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer, dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with carboplatin-paclitaxel alone. In the mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high population, 118 patients were enrolled (53, dostarlimab arm; 65, placebo arm) and randomized 1:1 to dostarlimab 500 mg or placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by dostarlimab or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. At the first interim analysis, a 72% reduction in the risk of progression or death (P < 0.0001) was seen with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), which was consistent with blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Safety results in the mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high population were similar to those previously reported for the overall population, where treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 100% of patients in both arms, treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97.9% of the dostarlimab arm and 98.8% of the placebo arm, immune-related adverse events occurred in 58.5% and 37.0%, respectively, and dostarlimab- or placebo-related immune-related adverse events were reported in 40.7% and 16.3%, respectively.
For previously treated mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high advanced/recurrent disease, single-agent programmed death-1 inhibitors showed durable activity. In the phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study (NCT02628067), patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for ≥35 cycles, and as of January 12, 2022, median (range) follow-up in the MSI-H/dMMR (n = 94) group was 54.5 (14.7-71.4) months, with objective response rate (95% CI) of 50% (40%-61%), 15 patients (16%) with complete response and 32 (34%) with partial response, median progression-free survival of 13.1 (95% CI, 4.3-25.7) months, and median overall survival of 65.4 (95% CI, 29.5-not reached) months. In GARNET Cohort A1, patients received dostarlimab 500 mg every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then dostarlimab 1000 mg every 6 weeks until disease progression, with objective response rate of 43.5% (95% CI 34.0% to 53.4%) with 11 complete responses and 36 partial responses. An indirect treatment comparison of GARNET Cohort A1 versus doxorubicin from ZoptEC (NCT01767155) reported median (95% CI) overall survival of not reached (NR; 18.0 months--NR) for dostarlimab (n = 92) versus 11.2 (10.0-13.1) months for doxorubicin (n = 233; HR: 0.41 [95% CI: 0.28-0.61]), median progression-free survival of 12.2 (3.3-NR) and 4.9 (4.1-6.6) months, respectively, and Grade ≥3 adverse events in 48.1% vs 78.3%, respectively.
A Bayesian network meta-analysis of four phase III randomized controlled trials involving 2577 patients found that dostarlimab plus chemotherapy or durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib was associated with more survival benefits than other immunotherapy regimens and chemotherapy in the mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR/MSS) population, respectively. In that analysis, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy increased efficacy (cost) by 3.76 QALYs and US$540 817, which yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$143 894/QALY in the dMMR/MSI-H population. Real-world data were consistent with trial results, with a disease control rate of 56% (n=24/43) and overall response rate of 35% (n=15/43) in France, and an objective response rate of 53.6% (95% CI 44.4 to 62.5) with complete response in 27 patients (21.6%) and partial response in 40 (32%) in the GEICO 120-R/DORA study of 129 patients with a median follow-up of 11.6 months (range; 0.8-30.1).
First-Line KEYTRUDA Monotherapy: Reshaping dMMR Endometrial Cancer Care
The recent announcement regarding KEYTRUDA's positive Phase 3 KEYNOTE-C93 trial results marks a significant milestone in the treatment of mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer. For years, patients facing this aggressive disease have primarily relied on platinum-based chemotherapy, often with limited long-term success and considerable side effects. While pembrolizumab has already been established as an effective option for previously treated dMMR endometrial cancer, these new data propel it into the first-line setting as a monotherapy, offering a compelling chemotherapy-free alternative.
The observed median progression-free survival of 38.2 months with KEYTRUDA, dramatically surpassing the 8.4 months seen with chemotherapy, underscores a profound clinical benefit. This magnitude of improvement is transformative, suggesting a potential for extended disease control and improved quality of life for patients who can avoid the immediate toxicities associated with traditional chemotherapy regimens. This shift necessitates robust and accurate dMMR biomarker testing to ensure appropriate patient selection, as the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is largely confined to this molecular subtype.
However, the introduction of any new therapy comes with considerations. While avoiding chemotherapy, patients on pembrolizumab may experience immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which, though distinct from chemotherapy side effects, can be serious and require careful management. Furthermore, despite the impressive response rates, not all dMMR patients will respond to immunotherapy, and some may eventually develop resistance. For these patients, combination strategies, such as pembrolizumab with lenvatinib, which has shown efficacy in dMMR patients who failed monotherapy, may become crucial subsequent options. This evolving landscape highlights the ongoing need for personalized treatment approaches and continued research into predictive biomarkers and combination therapies to address primary resistance and disease progression.
Frequently Asked Questions
References
- [1] Mastrantoni L, Camarda F et al.. Gene actionability according to the ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) in No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP) endometrial cancer. ESMO open. 2025 Sep. 40907210
- [2] Sultan W, Siddiqui T et al.. The efficacy and safety of the novel combination lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2024 May 15. 38720703
- [3] Jo A, Shoji T et al.. Treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer using immune checkpoint inhibitors. International journal of clinical oncology. 2025 Feb. 39812928
- [4] O'Malley DM, Bariani GM et al.. Health-related quality of life with pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated advanced microsatellite instability high/mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer in the KEYNOTE-158 study. Gynecologic oncology. 2022 Aug. 35835611
- [5] Chao A, Lu CC et al.. Promising response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and low-dose chemotherapy in advanced endometrial cancer: A preliminary report. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi. 2026 Aug. 41672816
- [6] How JA, Patel S et al.. Toxicity and efficacy of the combination of pembrolizumab with recommended or reduced starting doses of lenvatinib for treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer. Gynecologic oncology. 2021 Jul. 33958211
- [7] Ruggiero A, Redemagni C et al.. A Delicate Balance: Immunotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in a Patient With Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of medical cases. 2026 Aug. 42490778
- [8] Oaknin A, Tinker AV et al.. Clinical Activity and Safety of the Anti-Programmed Death 1 Monoclonal Antibody Dostarlimab for Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Mismatch Repair-Deficient Endometrial Cancer: A Nonrandomized Phase 1 Clinical Trial. JAMA oncology. 2020 Nov 1. 33001143
- [9] Makker V, Rasco D et al.. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. The Lancet. Oncology. 2019 May. 30922731
- [10] Uijterwaal MH, van Dijk D et al.. Prognostic value of molecular classification in stage IV endometrial cancer. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2024 Jun 3. 38658021
- [11] Tymon-Rosario J, Siegel ER et al.. Trastuzumab tolerability in the treatment of advanced (stage III-IV) or recurrent uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress HER2/neu. Gynecologic oncology. 2021 Oct. 34372971
- [12] Young MR, Higgins SA et al.. Adjuvant carboplatin, paclitaxel, and vaginal cuff brachytherapy for stage III endometrial cancer: analysis of outcomes and patterns of recurrence based on pathologic characteristics. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2015 Mar. 25621409
- [13] Wen Q, Shao Z et al.. Concomitant paclitaxel plus carboplatin and radiotherapy for high-risk or advanced endometrial cancer. International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. 2013 May. 23615571
- [14] Makker V, Taylor MH et al.. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2020 Sep 10. 32167863
- [15] Lee YJ, Lee YY et al.. A phase II study of induction PD-1 blockade (nivolumab) in patients with surgically completely resectable mismatch repair deficient endometrial cancer (NIVEC). Journal of gynecologic oncology. 2025 May. 39530558
- [16] Mirza MR, Chase DM et al.. Dostarlimab for Primary Advanced or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer. The New England journal of medicine. 2023 Jun 8. 36972026
- [17] Feng W, Jia N et al.. Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic marker in high-risk endometrial cancer. Journal of translational medicine. 2021 Feb 3. 33536036
- [18] Kobayashi Y, Kitazono I et al.. Molecular Evaluation of Endometrial Dedifferentiated Carcinoma, Endometrioid Carcinoma, Carcinosarcoma, and Serous Carcinoma Using a Custom-Made Small Cancer Panel. Pathology oncology research : POR. 2021. 35002543
- [19] Bujnak AC, Solaru SA et al.. Clinical applications of antibody drug conjugates for gynecologic malignancies: Review of available medicines and emerging therapeutics. Gynecologic oncology. 2025 Apr. 40139025
- [20] Tanaka Y, Amano T et al.. Locally advanced endometrial cancer with multiple immune-related adverse events coinciding with the complete response to radiotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: A case report. Gynecologic oncology reports. 2023 Oct. 37705723
Contact Us
Address
350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901
For General Inquiry
info@pienomial.com











