Cellectar Biosciences Reports Positive 12-Month Follow-Up Data from Phase 2b CLOVER WaM Study Demonstrating Durable Responses and Efficacy of Iopofosine I 131 in r/r Waldenström Macroglobulinemia
Clinical Trial Updates

Cellectar Biosciences Reports Positive 12-Month Follow-Up Data from Phase 2b CLOVER WaM Study Demonstrating Durable Responses and Efficacy of Iopofosine I 131 in r/r Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Published : 07 May 2026

At a Glance
IndicationWaldenström macroglobulinemia
DrugIopofosine I 131
Mechanism of ActionPhospholipid Drug Conjugate
CompanyCellectar Biosciences, Inc.
Trial PhasePhase 2b
Trial AcronymCLOVER WaM
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Primary EndpointMajor Response Rate (MRR)
Secondary EndpointMedian Duration of Response (DoR)
Overall Response Rate (ORR)83.6%
Major Response Rate (MRR)61.8%
Median Duration of Response (DoR)17.8 months
Median Progression-Free Survival (PFS)13.5 months
Very Good Partial Response/Complete Response Rate (VGPR/CR)14.5%
Disease Control Rate (DCR)98.2%
Patient Population Size (Per Protocol)55
Median Prior Lines of Therapy4 (range 2-15)
BTKi-Exposed Patients (n)39
MRR in BTKi-Exposed Patients64.1%
Median DoR in BTKi-Exposed Patients18.2 months
Median PFS in BTKi-Exposed Patients15.9 months
BTKi-Refractory Patients (n)33
MRR in BTKi-Refractory Patients63.6%
Median DoR in BTKi-Refractory Patients18.2 months
Median PFS in BTKi-Refractory Patients14.8 months
Regulatory AgencyU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA)
Review DesignationBreakthrough Designation, Orphan Drug Designation, Rare Pediatric Drug Designation, Fast Track Designation, PRIority MEdicines (PRIME) Designation
Conference NameAmerican Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting
Conference DateMay 29-June 2, 2026
Conference LocationChicago, Illinois
Confirmatory Study InitiationFourth Quarter 2026
Target Market/Region for SubmissionUnited States, Europe

Cellectar's Iopofosine I 131 Shows Durable Responses in WM Phase 2b

Cellectar Biosciences announced positive 12-month follow-up data from its Phase 2b CLOVER WaM clinical trial evaluating iopofosine I 131 in 55 patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The updated dataset, which includes a minimum of 12 months of follow-up for all enrolled patients as requested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), demonstrated an Overall Response Rate (ORR) of 83.6% and a Major Response Rate (MRR) of 61.8%, achieving the primary endpoint. The median Duration of Response (DoR) was 17.8 months, meeting a secondary endpoint. These results strengthen the regulatory positioning for accelerated approval and support the planned initiation of a confirmatory trial in the fourth quarter of 2026.

  • The CLOVER WaM study demonstrated compelling efficacy in a heavily pretreated r/r WM patient population, with a median of four prior lines of therapy. Key results from the per protocol study population (n=55) included an 83.6% Overall Response Rate (ORR), a 61.8% Major Response Rate (MRR) which was the primary endpoint, and a median Duration of Response (DoR) of 17.8 months, a secondary endpoint. Responses deepened and remained durable, underscoring the potential of iopofosine I 131 as a meaningful, time-limited treatment option given its fixed-dose regimen.
  • Iopofosine I 131 showed strong and consistent efficacy in difficult-to-treat BTKi-exposed (n=39) and BTKi-refractory (n=33) patient subgroups. In BTKi-exposed patients, the MRR was 64.1% with a median DoR of 18.2 months and median PFS of 15.9 months. Similar results were observed in BTKi-refractory patients, reinforcing the drug's potential to address a critical unmet need in the second-line setting and beyond, especially since there are no FDA-approved treatment options for patients progressing on BTKi therapy.
  • The drug maintained a predictable and manageable safety profile, with adverse events being transient, low rates of infection (<10%), and no significant bleeding events, unlike other WM therapies. Cytopenias were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. The mature 12-month follow-up data, incorporating surrogate endpoints and demonstration of durable responses in a high unmet need population, aligns with FDA expectations for accelerated approval, with plans for a confirmatory randomized study in a post-first line, post-BTKi population.

Addressing the Unmet Needs in Relapsed/Refractory WM

Current treatment approaches for Waldenström macroglobulinemia face significant challenges that limit optimal patient outcomes. Despite the availability of multiple effective therapeutic agents, the disease remains incurable and lacks consensus on preferred treatments in the relapsed setting. These limitations have driven extensive research into novel therapeutic strategies and combination approaches.

Drug resistance and treatment discontinuation: BTK inhibitor resistance represents a major limitation, with ibrutinib discontinuation occurring in 27% of patients due to disease progression (14%), toxicity (8%), nonresponse (3%), and other factors, with cumulative discontinuation rates reaching 43% at 48 months

Predictive biomarkers for treatment failure: Baseline platelet count ≤100 K/µL and tumor CXCR4 mutations are independently associated with 4-fold increased odds of ibrutinib discontinuation, while TP53 mutations correlate with shorter overall survival in chemo-free regimens

Post-discontinuation disease management challenges: IgM rebound (≥25% increase) occurs in 73% of patients following ibrutinib discontinuation, with nearly half experiencing this within 4 weeks, necessitating close monitoring and consideration of continued therapy until next treatment initiation

Toxicity profiles limiting therapeutic utility: Significant toxicity remains a major constraint, particularly with agents like idelalisib, despite demonstrated efficacy, highlighting the need for better-tolerated treatment options

Suboptimal salvage therapy outcomes: Patients discontinuing ibrutinib due to disease progression have significantly shorter overall survival compared to those discontinuing for nonprogression events (21 versus 32 months; P = .046), though salvage therapy responses are higher when initiated within 2 weeks of stopping ibrutinib

Limited role of stem cell transplantation: The therapeutic position of SCT in WM remains undefined due to insufficient patient data, leaving a gap in treatment options for appropriate candidates

CLOVER WaM's Durable Efficacy in Heavily Pretreated WM

Recent clinical evidence demonstrates the evolving therapeutic landscape for Waldenström macroglobulinemia, with particular emphasis on BTK inhibitor optimization and real-world treatment outcomes. These studies provide valuable insights into efficacy maintenance, safety profiles, and long-term disease management strategies across diverse patient populations.

ASPEN Study (BGB-3111-302) evaluated zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib in MYD88-mutated WM patients, demonstrating comparable efficacy with superior safety profile and leading to zanubrutinib approval for WM treatment

LTE1 Extension Study (BGB-3111-LTE1) followed 47 patients transitioning from ibrutinib to zanubrutinib, showing 85% treatment continuation at 15.3 months median follow-up with 96% maintaining or improving disease response without compromising safety

Chinese Histologic Transformation Study analyzed 15 WM patients who transformed to DLBCL, revealing that BTK inhibitor-based regimens after transformation significantly prolonged overall survival (p = 0.007) with median OS of 26.0 months

Chinese CD20-Targeted Therapy Study compared four regimens (FCR, BR, R-CHOP, rituximab monotherapy) in 128 WM patients over 10 years, with FCR achieving longest OS (75.86 ± 22.05 months) but highest grade ≥3 adverse event rate (60%)

German Claims Database Analysis of 593 WM cases (2010-2022) showed median OS of 7.9 years, with 70% initially managed with watch-and-wait approach and rituximab-based combinations as most common active treatment

Finnish Nationwide Study (2007-2021) demonstrated improved survival outcomes over time between early (2007-2014) and late (2015-2021) cohorts, with infections and WM itself as major causes of death

Iopofosine I 131's Manageable Safety and Regulatory Path

Published safety and tolerability data for Iopofosine I 131 demonstrates a predictable and manageable toxicity profile across multiple studies spanning nearly a decade. The primary safety concerns are hematologic toxicities that are transient and resolve without long-term sequelae. Clinical experience ranges from single-agent administration to combination therapy with external beam radiation therapy.

Grade 4 hematologic toxicities represent the primary safety signal, with the most recent 2025 head and neck cancer study reporting thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and anemia in 8 of 12 participants, occurring predictably during weeks 6-8 and resolving within three weeks without sequelae

Dose-limiting toxicities are consistently hematologic in nature, with the 2016 Phase 1b study identifying thrombocytopenia and neutropenia as DLTs at doses of 31.25 mCi/m² and above in the adaptive dose-escalation design

Lower single doses demonstrate excellent tolerability, as evidenced in the 2015 Phase 1a study where 370 MBq single administrations were well tolerated across all eight subjects with no severe adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities reported

Non-hematologic toxicity burden appears minimal, with the 2025 combination study showing no treatment-related grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicities when CLR 131 was combined with external beam radiation therapy

Myelosuppression follows expected patterns for radiopharmaceuticals, with predictable timing and recovery profiles that align with the known mechanism of action and radiation dosimetry predictions of approximately 400 mSv marrow dose at 740 MBq

Iopofosine I 131: Beyond WM and Future Potential

Iopofosine I 131 is being investigated across multiple cancer types beyond Waldenström macroglobulinemia, with the most advanced clinical development in head and neck cancer. These trials employ various intervention models ranging from monotherapy dose-escalation studies to combination approaches with external beam radiation therapy.

Indication Trial Phase Intervention Model Study Design Key Details
Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer Phase 1 CLR 131 + reduced dose EBRT Single-centre, open-label Two doses CLR 131 (days 1,8) + EBRT (60-70 Gy); NCT04105543; 12 participants completed
Advanced Solid Tumors (refractory/relapsed) Phase 1a Single injection monotherapy Single-arm dosimetry study 370 MBq single dose; NCT00925275; 8 subjects; well tolerated
Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1b Monotherapy dose-escalation Adaptive dose-escalation 10 patients; DLTs at ≥31.25 mCi/m²; thrombocytopenia and neutropenia
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Phase 1 Monotherapy with dosimetry Pilot dosimetry study CLR 124 PET imaging followed by CLR 131 therapeutic dosing
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Clinical trial Imaging and therapeutic agent SPECT imaging study Part of advanced solid tumors trial; demonstrated tumor accumulation
Osteosarcoma Preclinical/Early development Monotherapy Not specified Targets both osteoblastic and non-ossifying tumor areas

Iopofosine I 131 Data Bolster Accelerated Approval in r/r WM

The recent announcement from Cellectar Biosciences regarding the 12-month follow-up data from its Phase 2b CLOVER WaM trial marks a significant moment for patients battling relapsed or refractory Waldenström macroglobulinemia (r/r WM). With an impressive Overall Response Rate of 83.6% and a Major Response Rate of 61.8%, alongside a median Duration of Response of 17.8 months, iopofosine I 131 has demonstrated robust clinical activity in a patient population desperately in need of new therapeutic options. These results are particularly compelling given the challenging nature of r/r WM, where durable responses are highly valued.

Crucially, the successful completion of the FDA-requested 12-month follow-up for all 55 enrolled patients, coupled with the achievement of both primary and secondary endpoints, substantially strengthens the drug's regulatory positioning for accelerated approval. This could pave the way for iopofosine I 131 to reach the market sooner, offering a novel treatment mechanism to address a persistent unmet need. For Cellectar, this represents a significant de-risking event, validating their development strategy and potentially establishing a strong foothold in the orphan drug market.

However, the path forward is not without its considerations. While the Phase 2b data are highly encouraging, the efficacy and safety profile observed in 55 patients will need to be confirmed in a larger, more diverse population. The planned confirmatory trial, slated for the fourth quarter of 2026, will be pivotal. Failure to replicate these strong results or demonstrate sustained clinical benefit in this larger study could jeopardize full approval or even lead to the withdrawal of accelerated approval. Furthermore, the regulatory landscape for accelerated approvals is under increasing scrutiny, emphasizing the importance of timely and successful execution of confirmatory trials. Despite these considerations, the current data provide a strong foundation for iopofosine I 131 to emerge as a valuable addition to the r/r WM treatment paradigm, offering renewed hope for patients and clinicians alike.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is iopofosine approved by the FDA?
Iopofosine (CLR 131) is not approved by the FDA for any indication. It is an investigational radiopharmaceutical currently being evaluated in clinical trials for various hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. The agent has received Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for several indications, including multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Is Waldenstrom's a form of leukemia?
Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) is not classified as a form of leukemia. It is a rare, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, specifically a lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). WM is characterized by the proliferation of malignant B lymphocytes and plasma cells primarily in the bone marrow, leading to the production of monoclonal IgM paraprotein. This distinguishes it from leukemias, which are cancers originating in blood-forming cells of the bone marrow.
What is the newest treatment for Waldenstrom?
The newest FDA-approved treatment for Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) is pirtobrutinib (Jaypirca), a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. Approved in April 2024, it is indicated for adult patients with WM who have received at least two prior lines of therapy, including a BTK inhibitor and an anti-CD20 antibody. This approval, based on the Phase 2 BRUIN study, addresses a critical unmet need for patients who have progressed on prior BTK inhibitor therapy.
What are the treatment options for Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia?
Treatment for symptomatic Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) often involves Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors (e.g., zanubrutinib, ibrutinib) or chemoimmunotherapy regimens, typically rituximab-based combinations (e.g., bendamustine-rituximab). Other therapeutic options include proteasome inhibitors (e.g., bortezomib), alkylating agents, and nucleoside analogs, often used in combination or for relapsed/refractory disease. Emerging treatments, such as the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, are also being explored, particularly in specific patient populations or those with resistance to prior therapies. Asymptomatic patients are typically managed with a "watch and wait" approach.
Can you live 30 years with Waldenstrom?
A 30-year survival with Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia is possible for a subset of patients, particularly those diagnosed at a younger age with favorable prognostic factors. While the median survival has significantly improved with modern therapies, typically ranging from 10-20 years, the indolent nature of WM and ongoing therapeutic advancements enable some individuals to live for several decades. Individual outcomes are highly variable, influenced by factors like age, disease burden, and genetic mutations.
What is the first line treatment for Waldenstrom?
First-line treatment for Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is individualized based on patient characteristics and disease features. Common approaches include Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors such as ibrutinib, which can be used as monotherapy. Alternatively, chemoimmunotherapy regimens like bendamustine-rituximab are frequently employed, especially for patients requiring a rapid response or with high tumor burden. Other options may include proteasome inhibitor-based regimens like bortezomib-dexamethasone-rituximab.

References

  1. [1] Gertz MA, Anagnostopoulos A et al.. Treatment recommendations in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia: consensus panel recommendations from the Second International Workshop on Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia. Seminars in oncology. 2003 Apr. 12720120
  2. [2] Gustine JN, Meid K et al.. Ibrutinib discontinuation in Waldenström macroglobulinemia: Etiologies, outcomes, and IgM rebound. American journal of hematology. 2018 Aug. 29280186
  3. [3] Liang SB, Wang YF et al.. Adjunctive Tongxinluo capsule for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ open. 2025 Dec 30. 41469050
  4. [4] Ailawadhi S, Paulus A et al.. Preclinical models of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and drug resistance. Best practice & research. Clinical haematology. 2016 Jun. 27825463
  5. [5] Jeong N, Jeong H et al.. Safety and efficacy of traditional herbal medicine Yukgunja-tang for atrophic gastritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2025 Sep 25. 40812557
  6. [6] Solia E, Kastritis E. Optimal use of BTK inhibitors in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia: combination or single drug approach?. Therapeutic advances in hematology. 2024. 39734591
  7. [7] Wang YR, Wang JQ et al.. Efficacy and safety of integrated Chinese and Western medicine in advanced pancreatic cancer: A double-center retrospective cohort study. World journal of gastrointestinal oncology. 2026 Feb 15. 41695916
  8. [8] Lubner SJ, Mullvain J et al.. A Phase 1, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study of 131I-CLR1404 in Subjects with Relapsed or Refractory Advanced Solid Malignancies. Cancer investigation. 2015. 26536061
  9. [9] Xia Y, Shen H et al.. A single-center retrospective study suggests a potential benefit of BTK inhibitor-based therapy in patients with histologic transformation of Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Annals of medicine. 2026 Dec. 41797694
  10. [10] Anderson PM. Radiopharmaceuticals for Treatment of Osteosarcoma. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2020. 32483729
  11. [11] Tomowiak C, Poulain S et al.. Six-year follow-up of phase II study exploring chemo-free treatment association with idelalisib and obinutuzumab in symptomatic relapsed/ refractory patients with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Annals of hematology. 2025 Jan. 39499299
  12. [12] Marsh IR, Grudzinski J et al.. Preclinical Pharmacokinetics and Dosimetry Studies of (124)I/(131)I-CLR1404 for Treatment of Pediatric Solid Tumors in Murine Xenograft Models. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2019 Oct. 30926646
  13. [13] Terefe T, Visser B et al.. First Report of Puccinia triticina (Leaf Rust) Race FBPT on Wheat in South Africa. Plant disease. 2014 Jul. 30708857
  14. [14] Singhal N, Maurya AK et al.. Evaluation of Bile Salt Hydrolases, Cholesterol-Lowering Capabilities, and Probiotic Potential of Enterococcus faecium Isolated From Rhizosphere. Frontiers in microbiology. 2019. 31379762
  15. [15] Adam DP, Grudzinski JJ et al.. Voxel-Level Dosimetry for Combined Iodine 131 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Paradigms for Head and Neck Cancer. International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics. 2024 Jul 15. 38367914
  16. [16] Besemer AE, Grudzinski JJ et al.. Pretreatment CLR 124 Positron Emission Tomography Accurately Predicts CLR 131 Three-Dimensional Dosimetry in a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patient. Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals. 2019 Feb. 30351218
  17. [17] Amaador K, Kersten MJ et al.. Treatment of relapsed and refractory Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. Leukemia & lymphoma. 2023 Jan. 36282673
  18. [18] Goodall E, Opat S. Zanubrutinib in the treatment of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia. Future oncology (London, England). 2025 Oct. 40932034
  19. [19] Buske C, Herold M et al.. Epidemiology, Real-World Treatment, and Economic Burden of Waldenström Macroglobulinemia: A Comprehensive Analysis Based on Anonymized Claims Data Between 2010 and 2022. Value in health regional issues. 2025 Nov. 40913807
  20. [20] Ramirez-Gamero A, Tsakmaklis N et al.. Familial clusters and clinical features, complications, and outcomes in 1000 patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Blood advances. 2026 Jan 27. 41118612

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts