Beyond Cancer Reports Updated Survival and Safety Data from Phase 1 UNO Trial Presented at AACR 2026
Clinical Trial Updates

Beyond Cancer Reports Updated Survival and Safety Data from Phase 1 UNO Trial Presented at AACR 2026

Published : Invalid Date

At a Glance
IndicationSolid tumors
DrugNitric Oxide
Mechanism of ActionImmunotherapeutic
CompanyBeyond Cancer, Ltd.
Trial PhasePhase 1
Trial AcronymUNO
NCT IDNCT05351502
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Patient Population Size10 patients
Patient SubpopulationHeavily pretreated patients with unresectable cutaneous or subcutaneous primary or metastatic lesions
Specific Cancer TypesBreast cancer, Squamous cell carcinoma, Melanoma
Dosage25,000 ppm UNO, 50,000 ppm UNO
Follow-up Duration22 to 40 months
Median Prior Systemic Therapies4
Conference NameAmerican Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2026
Regulatory Body (Patent)U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Patent TitleSystem and Method for Delivery of Gas to a Tissue
Data Cut-off DateFebruary 2, 2026
Treatment ModalitySingle intratumoral injection

Beyond Cancer's UNO Trial Shows Durable Survival in Heavily Pretreated Patients

Beyond Cancer, Ltd. announced updated follow-up data from its Phase 1 UNO trial (NCT05351502) at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2026. The trial evaluated intratumoral ultra-high concentration nitric oxide (UNO) in ten heavily pretreated patients with unresectable cutaneous or subcutaneous lesions, including breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. As of February 2, 2026, six of ten patients remained alive between 22 to 40 months following a single UNO injection, with median overall survival not yet reached. Two patients with triple-negative breast cancer showed no evidence of disease. The treatment demonstrated a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile, with most adverse events being Grade 1 or 2. Additionally, the company received a U.S. patent allowance for its proprietary gas delivery technology for UNO.

  • The Phase 1 UNO trial demonstrated notable durability of survival in a challenging, heavily pretreated patient population. Six of ten patients, who had received a median of four prior systemic therapies, remained alive between 22 to 40 months after a single intratumoral UNO injection. Median overall survival had not been reached at the last follow-up, and two triple-negative breast cancer patients continued to show no evidence of disease, suggesting significant therapeutic potential in a salvage-stage setting with limited treatment alternatives.
  • UNO therapy exhibited a generally favorable safety and tolerability profile in the Phase 1 study. Most treatment-related adverse events were predominantly Grade 1 or Grade 2, indicating a manageable side effect profile. A single treatment-related serious adverse event (hypoxia) occurred at the 25,000 ppm dose but was not considered dose-limiting and resolved fully, supporting the potential for UNO to be further developed with a favorable toxicity profile.
  • Beyond Cancer significantly strengthened its intellectual property portfolio with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office issuing a Notice of Allowance for a patent application titled, “System and Method for Delivery of Gas to a Tissue.” This patent allowance covers the company's proprietary gas delivery technology for UNO, providing a robust foundation for the continued development and potential commercialization of its ultra-high concentration nitric oxide platform for solid tumors.

Addressing Unmet Needs in Heavily Pre-treated Solid Tumors

Current treatment approaches for solid tumors face multiple interconnected challenges that limit therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes. These limitations span from fundamental drug selectivity issues to complex resistance mechanisms that emerge during treatment. The challenges are particularly pronounced in heavily pre-treated patients where conventional therapies have reached their efficacy plateau.

Poor drug selectivity - Conventional anticancer drugs display relatively poor selectivity for neoplastic cells, particularly in solid tumors, leading to significant off-target effects and toxicity

Hypoxic tumor microenvironment - Hypoxic environments prevalent in solid tumors create challenging conditions for treatment effectiveness and require specialized drug design approaches

Intratumor heterogeneity - Contributes to treatment failure by initiating phenotypic diversity that enables drug resistance to emerge and introduces tumor sampling bias in therapeutic targeting

Cancer stem cell populations - Stem-like cells identified within solid tumors drive drug resistance, metastasis, and local relapse, representing a persistent reservoir of treatment-resistant disease

Robust resistance mechanisms - Expression or development of drug resistance decreases efficacy through multiple pathways including increased glutathione transferases, enhanced DNA repair, and metabolic plasticity

EGFR inhibitor resistance - Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors like gefitinib and erlotinib show limited clinical efficacy due to resistance development, caused in more than 50% of cases by emergence of secondary T790M point-mutation in EGFR's ATP-binding cleft

Immunosuppressive environment - Immune evasion and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment pose significant challenges for immunotherapy approaches in solid tumors

Efficacy plateau of conventional therapy - Traditional chemotherapeutic regimens have reached an efficacy plateau against most solid tumors while maintaining significant toxicity profiles

Updated Safety and Survival Data for UNO in Solid Tumors

Recent published data demonstrates that nitric oxide exhibits variable safety profiles across different therapeutic applications and delivery methods. The tolerability depends significantly on the specific indication, dosing regimen, patient population, and route of administration. Clinical experience spans from well-established uses in neonatal care to emerging applications in oncology and antimicrobial therapy.

Inhaled nitric oxide in respiratory applications shows generally acceptable tolerability but requires careful monitoring, with abrupt discontinuation causing significant hemodynamic complications in 25.8% of patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, including cardiovascular collapse from acute right ventricular afterload increases

Pediatric populations demonstrate good tolerability across multiple studies, with no clinically important side effects observed in 37 neonates treated with sildenafil (working through NO pathway) for persistent pulmonary hypertension, and well-tolerated responses in antimicrobial applications using inhaled NO at 150-250 ppm for 4 weeks

Cardiovascular applications reveal dose-dependent effects, with nitroglycerin causing venodilation at lower doses and arteriodilation at higher doses, while immediate-release sodium nitrite produces manageable asymptomatic blood pressure drops of 10/6 mmHg in diabetic patients

Recreational nitrous oxide abuse presents significant neurological risks, causing myeloneuropathy through vitamin B12 metabolism disruption, with 87.5% of abuse patients showing T2 hyperintensity on MRI and severe motor deficits from axonal dysfunction

Novel delivery systems show promising safety profiles, with S-nitrosothiol-loaded nanoparticles for lymphatic delivery demonstrating low-to-negligible systemic NO accumulation and no apparent inflammation, while NO-releasing nanoparticles face challenges with toxicity and clinical application despite encouraging antimicrobial results

Systemic administration challenges include the short half-life of NO (1-5 seconds), uncontrolled blood circulation release, and potential for extensive side effects from NO donors affecting both local tumor microenvironments and causing systemic hypotension from iNOS overexpression

Nitric Oxide's Diverse Therapeutic Applications Beyond Cancer

Nitric oxide-based therapies are being investigated across multiple therapeutic areas beyond oncology, with particularly active research in cardiovascular, metabolic, and rare disease applications. However, specific clinical trial intervention model details are limited in the available literature.

Therapeutic Area Specific Indication Intervention Approach Clinical Evidence
Hematology Sickle cell disease (SCD) Arginine supplementation to normalize NO levels Decreased intensity of vaso-occlusive crises; low-cost approach showing promising results
Neuromuscular Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) Vascular-targeted treatments to address functional ischemia Strategies focus on facilitating vasorelaxation through neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS)
Cardiovascular Atherosclerotic vascular disorders L-arginine replacement therapy Normalizes L-arginine/ADMA ratio; combined therapy needed for patients with high ADMA levels resistant to statins
Pulmonary Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) Dual combination therapy targeting endothelin and NO pathways Standard of care approach for most patients
Gastroenterology NSAID-induced GI protection NO-releasing compounds (e.g., amtolmetin guacyl) Increases endogenous NO biosynthesis selectively at gastric mucosa
Endocrinology Type 2 diabetes mellitus SGLT2 inhibitors with NO modulation Significant decrease in NO levels observed at 12 weeks in prospective, parallel, open-label study

Ultra-High Nitric Oxide: A New Frontier in Localized Cancer Therapy

The recent announcement from Beyond Cancer, Ltd. regarding updated follow-up data from its Phase 1 UNO trial marks a potentially significant development in the treatment landscape for localized, refractory solid tumors. In a small cohort of ten heavily pretreated patients with unresectable cutaneous or subcutaneous lesions, including breast cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma, the intratumoral administration of ultra-high concentration nitric oxide (UNO) demonstrated remarkable durability. Six of these patients remained alive between 22 to 40 months following a single injection, with the median overall survival not yet reached. Notably, two patients with triple-negative breast cancer, a subtype known for its aggressive nature and lack of targeted therapies, achieved no evidence of disease.

This early data is particularly compelling given the high unmet need in this patient population, who often have exhausted conventional treatment options. The favorable safety and tolerability profile, with most adverse events being Grade 1 or 2, further strengthens the potential of UNO. The underlying scientific premise leverages the complex biology of nitric oxide (NO). While NO has a dual role in cancer, with some studies linking lower or chronic NO exposure to tumor progression and metastasis, research also consistently shows that high concentrations of NO can induce potent cytotoxicity and apoptosis in tumor cells. The key differentiator for UNO appears to be its ability to deliver ultra-high concentrations directly into the tumor, potentially tipping the balance towards anti-tumorigenic effects and remodeling the tumor microenvironment to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Strategically, these results suggest several implications:

  • UNO could emerge as a vital localized therapy for patients with refractory solid tumors, offering a new option where current treatments fall short.

  • The company's recently granted U.S. patent for its proprietary gas delivery technology provides a strong intellectual property foundation, protecting its unique approach and offering a competitive edge.

  • The broad activity observed across different tumor types hints at UNO's potential as a platform technology, though future development will likely focus on specific indications with the highest unmet need.

However, it is crucial to acknowledge the inherent risks associated with early-phase data. The small sample size and heterogeneous nature of the patient population mean that these promising results require validation in larger, controlled studies. The complex and sometimes contradictory role of NO in cancer also necessitates careful consideration of the therapeutic window and potential for off-target effects. Furthermore, the practicalities of consistently delivering ultra-high concentrations of gas intratumorally will need to be addressed as the therapy progresses through development. Despite these considerations, the long-term survival and complete responses observed in such a challenging patient group position UNO as a novel and exciting candidate that warrants close attention from the oncology community.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the miracle drug for cancer?
A single "miracle drug" that universally cures all types of cancer does not exist. Cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, encompassing hundreds of distinct types with unique genetic and molecular profiles. Treatment strategies are highly individualized, leveraging a combination of modalities like surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapies. While significant advancements have improved outcomes for many, no single agent provides a universal cure across all cancers.
Which vitamin is known as cancer vitamin?
No vitamin is scientifically or clinically known as the "cancer vitamin." This term is a misnomer, likely stemming from historical controversies surrounding unproven alternative cancer treatments, such as laetrile (often misidentified as vitamin B17), or misunderstandings about the complex roles of various vitamins in cancer development and progression. While some vitamins are studied for their potential roles in cancer prevention or treatment, none are singularly designated in this manner.
What does Japan use to fight cancer?
Japan employs a comprehensive array of cancer treatments, integrating standard therapies like surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation with advanced modalities. A significant focus is placed on precision medicine, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, which are widely adopted. Japan is also a leader in developing and utilizing advanced radiation techniques, including proton and heavy-ion therapy, and actively contributes to novel drug development and clinical trials.
What is the standard of care in cancer?
The standard of care in cancer refers to the current best practices and treatments widely accepted and used by healthcare professionals for a specific type and stage of cancer. These protocols are evidence-based, derived from rigorous clinical trials, expert consensus, and regulatory approvals, representing the most effective and safest options available. It is a dynamic concept, continually evolving as new research, technologies, and therapeutic advancements emerge.
How are solid tumors treated?
Solid tumors are primarily treated through local therapies such as surgery and radiation, which aim to remove or destroy the tumor at its primary site. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and hormone therapy, are employed to eliminate cancer cells throughout the body or prevent recurrence. Treatment plans are often multimodal and highly individualized, considering tumor type, stage, molecular characteristics, and patient health.
What are the 5 requirements of an ideal tumor marker?
An ideal tumor marker exhibits high specificity and sensitivity, accurately distinguishing malignancy from benign conditions and enabling early detection. It provides significant prognostic and predictive value, correlating with disease stage, progression, and therapeutic response. Crucially, it must be easily measurable in accessible body fluids via reliable, cost-effective assays.

References

  1. [1] Zhang W, Wang Y et al.. Manganese nanosheets loaded with selenium and gemcitabine activate the tumor microenvironment to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Journal of colloid and interface science. 2025 Mar 15. 39637652
  2. [2] Alyabyeva PV, Petrova MM et al.. Association of Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Rs2779249 (chr17:26128581 C>A) and Rs rs2297518 (chr17: chr17:27769571 G>A) of the NOS2 Gene with Tension-Type Headache and Arterial Hypertension Overlap Syndrome in Eastern Siberia. Genes. 2023 Feb 17. 36833440
  3. [3] Tsuruo T. Molecular cancer therapeutics: recent progress and targets in drug resistance. Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan). 2003 Mar. 12705787
  4. [4] Maniskas ME, Roberts JM et al.. Intra-arterial nitroglycerin as directed acute treatment in experimental ischemic stroke. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2018 Jan. 28031354
  5. [5] Tomida A, Tsuruo T. Drug resistance mediated by cellular stress response to the microenvironment of solid tumors. Anti-cancer drug design. 1999 Apr. 10405643
  6. [6] Coats AJS, Tolppanen H. Drug Treatment of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Defining the Role of Vericiguat. Drugs. 2021 Sep. 34478114
  7. [7] Jamal SA, Hamilton CJ. Nitric oxide donors for the treatment of osteoporosis. Current osteoporosis reports. 2012 Mar. 22210559
  8. [8] Wang Z, Jin A et al.. Advanced Nitric Oxide Generating Nanomedicine for Therapeutic Applications. ACS nano. 2023 May 23. 37126728
  9. [9] Meng G, Yang S et al.. Attenuating effects of dihydromyricetin on angiotensin II-induced rat cardiomyocyte hypertrophy related to antioxidative activity in a NO-dependent manner. Pharmaceutical biology. 2015 Jun. 25471017
  10. [10] Nitin, Sharma N et al.. Multi-nanocarrier Strategy for Light-Activated Nitric Oxide Release: Ruthenium Nitrosyl Complexes in Liposomes, Micelles, and Niosomes for Cancer Therapy. ACS applied bio materials. 2025 Nov 17. 41139868
  11. [11] Montgomery HJ, Perdicakis B et al.. Photo-control of nitric oxide synthase activity using a caged isoform specific inhibitor. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry. 2002 Jun. 11937350
  12. [12] Gaine S, McLaughlin V. Pulmonary arterial hypertension: tailoring treatment to risk in the current era. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2017 Dec 31. 29263175
  13. [13] Twiner MJ, Hennessy J et al.. Nitroglycerin Use in the Emergency Department: Current Perspectives. Open access emergency medicine : OAEM. 2022. 35847764
  14. [14] Stamer WD, Chiu T et al.. Real-world impact of latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024% in glaucoma therapy: a narrative review. Frontiers in ophthalmology. 2025. 40224211
  15. [15] Yap TA, Gerlinger M et al.. Intratumor heterogeneity: seeing the wood for the trees. Science translational medicine. 2012 Mar 28. 22461637
  16. [16] Seferian A, Simonneau G. Therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension: where are we today, where do we go tomorrow?. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2013 Sep 1. 23997048
  17. [17] Vladimirova-Kitova LG. Asymmetric dimethylarginine--mechanisms and targets for therapeutic management. Folia medica. 2008. 18543783
  18. [18] Galvani E, Alfieri R et al.. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: current status and future perspectives in the development of novel irreversible inhibitors for the treatment of mutant non-small cell lung cancer. Current pharmaceutical design. 2013. 22973953
  19. [19] Ogiso Y, Tomida A et al.. Proteasome inhibition circumvents solid tumor resistance to topoisomerase II-directed drugs. Cancer research. 2000 May 1. 10811120
  20. [20] Jain K, Sethi SK et al.. Effects of Inhaled Nitrous Oxide on the Induction Dose and Time Requirements of Propofol: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. Anesthesia, essays and researches. 2017 Jan-Mar. 28298780

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts