APTN-101 Phase 1 Initiates Against a Validated Failure: BBB Delivery, Not Biology, Is the Swing Factor
Clinical Trial Updates

APTN-101 Phase 1 Initiates Against a Validated Failure: BBB Delivery, Not Biology, Is the Swing Factor

Published : 22 Aug 2026

The Overview
Adaptin Bio has initiated enrolment for a Phase I clinical trial of its Brain Bispecific T cell Engager (BRiTE) therapy, APTN-101, for adults with glioblastoma. This first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation study, conducted in partnership with Duke University in the US, aims to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose of APTN-101 in up to 15 patients diagnosed with WHO Grade IV Malignant Glioma. The BRiTE platform is designed to improve drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier and specifically target tumour cells expressing the epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII). The US FDA granted IND clearance in September 2024, paving the way for this trial.
Knolens Analysis

The sharpest verdict is this: APTN-101 enters human testing not as a novel mechanism, but as a re-engineered delivery attempt against a target whose biology has already been validated and whose prior clinical execution has already failed. The Roche/Genentech EGFRvIII × CD3 T-cell bispecific — mechanistically identical to APTN-101 — achieved CSF penetration at a CSF/serum ratio of 0.08 in 36 patients across doses up to 10 mg Q3W, yet remained 6-fold below predicted therapeutic threshold at the maximum tested dose, producing no observed efficacy signal. That program's own conclusion acknowledged that higher dose levels may be warranted. [1] APTN-101's BRiTE platform is explicitly designed to surpass this delivery ceiling, making the Phase 1 a direct test of one specific engineering thesis rather than an exploratory first-in-class experiment. The 15-patient sample size is the program's most immediate structural vulnerability: AMG 595, an EGFRvIII-targeting ADC with a different mechanism, screened 382 patients to enroll 32, implying a screen success rate of approximately 8.4%, suggesting that without a defined EGFRvIII expression threshold and a standardized companion diagnostic, APTN-101 risks enrolling patients with insufficient target expression and diluting any nascent efficacy signal. [2] No EGFRvIII-directed therapy of any modality — BiTE, ADC, or CAR-T — has demonstrated meaningful efficacy in human glioblastoma to date, meaning the target remains biologically plausible but clinically unvalidated. On payer and market access, bevacizumab's PBAC listing in relapsed/refractory glioblastoma was granted on palliative benefit grounds despite no OS benefit, and dabrafenib plus trametinib was evaluated by PBAC in a BRAF V600 biomarker-selected high-grade glioma cohort under a single-arm design with survival extrapolations explicitly flagged as optimistic. [3][4] Both precedents share biomarker-driven single-arm design with APTN-101 but differ mechanistically — neither involves T-cell engagement or BBB-engineered biologics — so they inform regulatory and payer pathway architecture but cannot be treated as efficacy benchmarks. No mechanistically matched precedent has cleared the approval bar in this indication. The sharpest risk is not safety — the Roche BiTE precedent demonstrated tolerability up to 10 mg Q3W with one DLT — but whether 15 evaluable patients, without a defined biomarker threshold or combination strategy, can generate a CNS exposure and efficacy signal sufficient to justify Phase 2 investment in a target class that has failed every prior human test.

APTN-101 has IND clearance and enrollment initiation only; no human PK, CNS exposure, safety, or efficacy data exist. The sole mechanistically matched precedent — the Roche EGFRvIII × CD3 TCB Phase 1 in 36 patients — generated no efficacy signal despite demonstrating BBB penetration, setting a high bar this program has not yet addressed in humans. [1]

At a Glance
IndicationGlioblastoma, Malignant Glioma
DrugAPTN-101
Mechanism of ActionBrain Bispecific T cell Engager (BRiTE)
CompanyAdaptin Bio
Trial PhasePhase I
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTrial Initiation / First Patient In (FPI)
Therapeutic AreaOncology
PartnerDuke University
Patient Population Sizeup to 15 patients
Primary Endpointproportion of patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity
Secondary EndpointsAPTN-101 pharmacokinetics, objective response rate
Exploratory Objectiveschanges in cytokine levels, development of anti-BRiTE antibodies, overall survival, progression-free survival
Regulatory MilestoneIND clearance
Regulatory AgencyUS Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
IND Clearance DateSeptember 2024
TargetEGFRvIII-expressing tumour cells
Patient Populationadults with World Health Organization (WHO) Grade IV Malignant Glioma

Adaptin Bio Opens Enrolment for Phase I Glioblastoma Trial

Adaptin Bio has initiated enrolment for a Phase I clinical trial of its Brain Bispecific T cell Engager (BRiTE) therapy, APTN-101, for adults with glioblastoma. This first-in-human, open-label, dose-escalation study, conducted in partnership with Duke University in the US, aims to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose of APTN-101 in up to 15 patients diagnosed with WHO Grade IV Malignant Glioma. The BRiTE platform is designed to improve drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier and specifically target tumour cells expressing the epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII). The US FDA granted IND clearance in September 2024, paving the way for this trial.

  • The Phase I trial is an open-label, dose-escalation study being conducted in collaboration with Duke University in the US. It is designed to enroll up to 15 adult patients diagnosed with World Health Organization (WHO) Grade IV Malignant Glioma. The primary objective is to establish the safety profile and determine the maximum tolerated dose of APTN-101, marking a crucial step in its clinical development.
  • APTN-101 leverages Adaptin Bio's proprietary BRiTE technology, engineered to enhance drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. This innovative platform specifically targets and attacks glioma tumour cells that express the epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII). Preclinical studies demonstrated impressive efficacy, including the elimination of some malignant glioma tumours across multiple aggressive disease models, suggesting its potential as a best-in-class therapy.
  • The trial's primary endpoint focuses on the proportion of patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity at each dose level. Secondary endpoints include the analysis of APTN-101 pharmacokinetics and objective response rate, measured by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Criteria. Exploratory objectives will assess biological activity, anti-BRiTE antibody development, overall survival, and progression-free survival. The US FDA granted Investigational New Drug (IND) application clearance in September 2024, enabling the commencement of this Phase I study.

Addressing the Persistent Challenges in Glioblastoma Treatment

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most treatment-refractory malignancies in oncology, with median survival largely unchanged despite decades of therapeutic advancement. Multiple intersecting biological and pharmacological barriers undermine the efficacy of current standard-of-care and emerging approaches.

  • Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Drug Penetration: The BBB constrains systemic chemotherapy delivery, particularly at the tumor periphery where infiltrating cells reside within regions of intact barrier function. Even where focal BBB disruption occurs in the tumor core, therapeutic drug concentrations remain insufficient across the broader infiltrative zone, directly limiting treatment efficacy.

  • Surgical Incompleteness: Radical surgical ablation is anatomically and functionally precluded in the brain. Even minimal residual tumor burden is sufficient to drive rapid recurrence, and complete tumor eradication — a prerequisite for cure — remains unachievable with current resection techniques.

  • Temozolomide Resistance: TMZ efficacy is contingent on intact DNA mismatch repair (MMR) machinery and is intrinsically limited by O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-mediated resistance. Although MGMT promoter methylation occurs in approximately 45% of cases, TMZ confers no survival benefit in the first nine months post-treatment in unselected populations. Acquired resistance through MMR mutation drives aggressive tumor regrowth following initial response, and additional uncharacterized resistance mechanisms — including decoupling of the DNA damage response from ongoing genotoxic insult — further erode therapeutic durability.

  • Glioblastoma Stem Cells (GSCs): GSCs exhibit robust tumorigenic and invasive capacity underpinned by enhanced DNA repair, distinct molecular signatures, and metabolic adaptations that confer resistance to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Their persistence following treatment is widely implicated in the near-universal pattern of tumor recurrence.

  • Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment: GBM harbors an inherently "cold" tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), characterized by a high ratio of pro-tumor to anti-tumor immune infiltrates and spatiotemporally dynamic immunosuppressive cell-cell interactions. This microenvironmental architecture has rendered immunotherapy — despite its success across other solid tumor indications — largely ineffective in GBM clinical trials to date.

  • Intratumoral Heterogeneity: GBM demonstrates profound cellular and tissue heterogeneity, supported by a remodeled extracellular scaffold with altered composition and mechanical properties that actively facilitates tumor cell infiltration and migration. This heterogeneity complicates therapeutic targeting and contributes to the emergence of treatment-resistant subclonal populations.

APTN-101's BRiTE Platform: An Emerging Mechanism for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma and malignant glioma research has seen a meaningful shift toward mechanistically diverse therapeutic strategies over the past three years, moving well beyond conventional cytotoxic approaches. Emerging mechanisms span immunological, metabolic, and combination paradigms, each addressing distinct vulnerabilities of the tumor microenvironment and tumor cell biology.

  • CAR T Cell Therapy with Multiantigen Targeting: CAR T cell constructs directed against tumor-associated antigens — including IL-13Rα2, HER2, EGFR, EGFRvIII, EphA2, GD2, and B7-H3 — represent an advancing front in GBM immunotherapy. Recent innovations focus on multiantigen targeting strategies, alternative cell sourcing, and optimized delivery routes to counteract key resistance mechanisms such as antigen downregulation and limited CAR T cell persistence within the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment.

  • Bispecific T Cell Engagers (BTEs) Targeting IL13RA2: Fully humanized BTEs bridge T cells to GBM tumor cells via IL13RA2 in an MHC-independent manner, enabling cytotoxic activity that bypasses classical antigen presentation constraints. In vivo xenograft models of both primary and recurrent GBM demonstrated robust target-specific activity and markedly prolonged survival, with no detectable off-target local or systemic toxicity.

  • Dendritic Cell (DC) Vaccination: Meta-analytic data indicate that DC vaccination combined with standard of care is associated with significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57–0.88) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43–0.98). In newly diagnosed GBM specifically, DC vaccination was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39–0.90), with trial sequential analysis confirming the cumulative z-score crossed the benefit boundary at the required sample size threshold.

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibition Informed by IDH Mutation Status: High expression of PDCD1 and CD274 has been observed irrespective of IDH1 mutation status, suggesting broad applicability of checkpoint blockade across GBM molecular subtypes. IDH1-wild-type glioblastomas may require co-targeting of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis alongside checkpoint inhibition, given PIK3R1 overexpression in this subgroup.

  • Metabolic Subtyping of Tumor-Associated Macrophages (TAMs): Glioma-associated macrophages have been reclassified into four metabolic subtypes — Glycolipid-Signaling (GSM), Detoxification and Energic (DEM), Polymetabolic (PmM), and Glycolipid Metabolism/Immunoregulatory (GMIM). The DEM subtype, characterized by terminal differentiation and enrichment in detoxification and energy pathways, correlates significantly with advanced tumor grade and poor survival (p < 0.05). Six core prognostic markers — CLIC1, FABP5, FCER1G, S100A8, S100A9, and SPP1 — have been identified within this framework.

  • ROS-Mediated Radioresistance via RNF7: RNF7 exerts a buffering effect against radiation-induced oxidative stress and counterbalances redox stress associated with IDH1 mutation through anti-ROS activity. Elevated RNF7 expression is associated with heightened metabolic resilience in glioma cells, contributing to radiotherapy resistance and representing a potential therapeutic target.

  • Clofazimine as an Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy Potentiator: Clofazimine has demonstrated enhancement of cytotoxic activity when combined with temozolomide, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. In experimental models, combining dendritic cell vaccine with clofazimine and chemoradiation extended median survival to 90 ± 7 days versus 45 ± 5 days in controls. This regimen was associated with a stronger anti-tumor immune response, evidenced by elevated serum interleukin-1β and IL-18 levels, and increased IBA1⁺/CD68⁺ pro-inflammatory microglial infiltration within neoplastic tissue.

Unpacking the Phase I Trial Design for APTN-101 in Glioblastoma

The clinical development landscape for glioblastoma (GBM) and malignant glioma spans a range of trial designs, from single-arm Phase I/II dose-escalation studies to retrospective cohorts and systematic meta-analyses. Across both newly diagnosed and recurrent settings, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) dominate as primary and secondary endpoints, with response assessments predominantly conducted using RANO criteria. The following table summarizes key trial parameters and outcomes across the major studies identified in the literature.

Trial / Study Setting Population Treatment Primary Endpoint(s) Key Secondary Endpoints Notable Results
Bevacizumab + Fotemustine (AINO Phase II) Recurrent GBM 54 patients at first relapse post-RT + TMZ Bevacizumab + fotemustine 6-month PFS rate OS, ORR (RANO), toxicity 6-mo PFS: 42.6% (95% CI 29.3–55.2); median PFS: 5.2 mo; median OS: 9.1 mo; ORR: 52%
Sintilimab + Bevacizumab + TMZ (Retrospective) Recurrent GBM 8 patients Sintilimab 200 mg Q3W + bevacizumab 10 mg/kg Q3W + TMZ 200 mg/m² (5/28 days) Investigator-assessed median PFS (mPFS) 6-mo PFS, ORR, DOR (RANO) mPFS: 3.34 mo (95% CI 2.217–4.463); 6-mo PFS: 25%; ORR: 62.5%
Bintrafusp Alfa (Phase I Expansion Cohort) Recurrent GBM 35 patients post-RT + TMZ Bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg Q2W Disease control rate (DCR) Safety DCR: 22.9%; median PFS: 1.4 mo (95% CI 1.2–1.6); 6-mo PFS: 15.1%; median OS: 5.3 mo; 6-mo OS: 44.5%
Trotabresib + TMZ (Phase Ib Dose-Escalation) Newly Diagnosed GBM 18 pts (adjuvant cohort); 14 pts (concomitant cohort) Trotabresib 15, 30, 45 mg + TMZ (adjuvant); trotabresib 15, 30 mg + TMZ + RT (concomitant) Safety, tolerability, MTD, RP2D Preliminary efficacy, pharmacokinetics RP2D established: 30 mg (4 days on / 24 days off) in both settings; exploratory PD assessed
TTFields Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis Newly diagnosed & recurrent GBM Clinical outcomes: 1,636 pts (542 ND-GBM; 1,094 R-GBM); Safety: 11,558 pts Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Pooled OS and PFS Safety ND-GBM: pooled median OS 21.7 mo (95% CI 19.6–23.8), median PFS 7.2 mo; R-GBM: pooled median OS 10.3 mo (95% CI 8.3–12.8), median PFS 5.7 mo
Phase II GBM Trial Landscape Analysis (FY2020–2022) Mixed (ND & recurrent) 88 Phase II trials analyzed (from 116 identified) Various PFS (22%), OS (20%), PFS rate (17%) OS (15%), PFS (15%), QoL (14%) Time-to-event endpoints in 73% of trials; ORR as primary endpoint in only 8% — significantly lower than FY2017–2019

A Novel Bispecific Engager Targets Glioblastoma's Toughest Barriers

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of oncology's most formidable challenges, characterized by its aggressive nature, rapid progression, and a dismal prognosis that has seen little improvement in decades. Current treatment modalities often fall short, primarily due to their non-specific action and the brain's natural defenses, particularly the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which severely restricts drug delivery to the tumor site. This dire unmet need underscores the significance of Adaptin Bio's move to initiate a Phase I clinical trial for APTN-101, a novel Brain Bispecific T cell Engager (BRiTE) therapy.

APTN-101 represents a promising new frontier in GBM immunotherapy. By specifically targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFRvIII), an antigen found exclusively on tumor cells, this therapy aims to redirect the immune system with exquisite precision, minimizing damage to healthy tissue. The BRiTE platform's innovative design to enhance BBB penetration is a critical strategic advantage, addressing a fundamental hurdle that has stymied many previous therapeutic attempts. This first-in-human study, conducted in collaboration with Duke University, a recognized leader in neuro-oncology research, is a crucial step in validating the safety and initial tolerability of this approach.

However, the path forward is not without its complexities. While bispecific T-cell engagers offer potent anti-tumor activity, they also carry the risk of immune-related toxicities, such as cytokine release syndrome, which will be closely monitored during dose escalation. Furthermore, the inherent heterogeneity of GBM tumors and the potential for antigen escape mechanisms mean that even highly specific therapies may face challenges in achieving durable responses. Ensuring that APTN-101 can not only cross the BBB but also maintain its functional activity within the unique microenvironment of the brain will be paramount. This trial, therefore, is not just about a new drug; it's about testing a novel paradigm for overcoming some of the most persistent obstacles in treating one of the deadliest cancers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GBM the deadliest cancer?
Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal cancers, characterized by a median survival of approximately 15-18 months even with standard-of-care treatment. Its highly infiltrative nature and resistance to therapy contribute to an exceptionally poor prognosis. While GBM is a devastating disease with extremely low survival rates, other cancers such as pancreatic cancer also exhibit similarly grim statistics, making it one of the deadliest rather than definitively the single deadliest.
Is there a breakthrough in glioblastoma research expected in 2026?
Glioblastoma research is actively exploring novel immunotherapies, targeted agents, and drug delivery methods. However, no specific breakthrough with a confirmed clinical impact is widely anticipated or projected for 2026. While promising candidates are in various clinical trial phases, definitive timelines for transformative advancements are not established.
How quickly do glioblastoma patients deteriorate?
Glioblastoma is an aggressive brain tumor characterized by rapid progression and a swift decline in patient condition. Deterioration typically manifests as worsening neurological deficits, including cognitive impairment, motor weakness, and seizures, due to rapid tumor growth and associated edema. Even with multimodal treatment, the median overall survival is approximately 15-20 months, underscoring the rapid and often relentless nature of the disease's progression. This rapid deterioration necessitates urgent and continuous management to mitigate symptoms and maintain quality of life.
Has anyone survived glioblastoma brain cancer?
Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain cancer with a poor prognosis, and the median survival is typically 12-18 months even with standard treatment. While long-term survival is rare, a small percentage of patients do survive beyond five years, and some even longer. These exceptional responders are subjects of ongoing research to understand underlying biological factors contributing to their prolonged survival.
What is the most promising clinical trial for glioblastoma?
The oncolytic adenovirus tasadenoturev (DNX-2401) is considered highly promising for glioblastoma, particularly in recurrent settings. Early phase trials have shown durable responses and extended survival in a subset of patients, a rare achievement for this aggressive cancer. Its ongoing investigation, including combinations with checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab, aims to further enhance its therapeutic potential.
Has anyone ever gone into full remission from glioblastoma?
Documented cases of complete, durable remission from glioblastoma are exceptionally rare. While a small percentage of patients achieve long-term survival, often defined as five years or more post-diagnosis, these instances are generally considered prolonged disease control rather than a definitive cure or full remission. Research continues to explore factors contributing to these rare favorable outcomes, including specific molecular subtypes and treatment responses.
What are the latest research findings on glioblastoma?
Recent glioblastoma research emphasizes strategies to overcome the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, including novel CAR T-cell designs, oncolytic viruses, and bispecific antibodies. Advancements in drug delivery, such as focused ultrasound for transient blood-brain barrier disruption, are enhancing the penetration of therapeutic agents. Investigations also focus on targeting metabolic vulnerabilities and developing combination therapies to circumvent resistance mechanisms and improve patient outcomes.

References

  1. [1] Duffy JT, Martin-Regalado A et al.. Fully Humanized Bispecific T Cell Engager Shows Potent Activity in Central Nervous System and Peripheral Tumors. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). 2026 Jun. 42057694
  2. [2] Youssef G, Rahman R et al.. Evaluation of Standard Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, Modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology, and Immunotherapy Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology in Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2023 Jun 10. 37027809
  3. [3] Ge Z, Jin G et al.. Risk factors for postoperative malignant progression of lower-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical oncology. 2026 Feb. 41242200
  4. [4] Kertmen N, Kavgaci G et al.. Evaluating Immunotherapy Responses in Neuro-Oncology for Glioblastoma and Brain Metastases: A Brief Review Featuring Three Cases. Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. 2025 Jan-Dec. 39953938
  5. [5] Murugan AK, Kannan S et al.. Immune checkpoint expression and therapeutic implications in IDH1-mutant and wild-type glioblastomas. Current problems in cancer. 2025 Apr. 39864140
  6. [6] Grewal EP, Nahed BV et al.. Clinical progress in the development of CAR T cells to treat malignant glioma. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2025 Feb. 39695004
  7. [7] Ahmed MH, Canney M et al.. Overcoming the blood brain barrier in glioblastoma: Status and future perspective. Revue neurologique. 2023 Jun. 37062676
  8. [8] Jain KK. A Critical Overview of Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma. Frontiers in oncology. 2018. 30374421
  9. [9] Mulliqi E, Khelwatty S et al.. The Co-Expression and Cellular Location of HER Family Members, EGFRvIII, Putative Cancer Stem Cell Biomarkers CD44 and CD109 in Patients with Glioblastoma, and Their Impacts on Prognosis. Cancers. 2025 Apr 4. 40227788
  10. [10] Gu S, Dou Z et al.. Metabolic reprogramming of glioma-associated macrophages identifies detoxification and energetic macrophages as drivers of immunosuppression and therapeutic vulnerability. Frontiers in immunology. 2026. 41756290
  11. [11] Tao Y, Shi Z et al.. RNF7-Mediated ROS Targets Malignant Phenotype and Radiotherapy Sensitivity in Glioma With Different IDH1 Genotypes. Molecular carcinogenesis. 2025 Apr. 39783768
  12. [12] Watanabe S, Maeda M et al.. Trends in Efficacy Endpoints in Phase II Glioblastoma Trials: A Regulatory Science Analysis (FY2020-FY2022). Cancers. 2025 Mar 1. 40075702
  13. [13] Khasraw M, Weller M et al.. Bintrafusp alfa (M7824), a bifunctional fusion protein targeting TGF-β and PD-L1: results from a phase I expansion cohort in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro-oncology advances. 2021 Jan-Dec. 34056607
  14. [14] Kee H, Lee H et al.. Integrated focused ultrasound and electromagnetic actuation (FUEM) system for enhanced targeted drug delivery in brain cancer treatment. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2026 Jan 10. 41241013
  15. [15] Lin Q, Wei Y et al.. Integrative multi-omic profiling of the neoantigen landscape of glioblastoma for the development of therapeutic vaccines reveals vast heterogeneity in immunogenic signatures. Frontiers in oncology. 2025. 40190555
  16. [16] Cui B, Johnson SP et al.. Decoupling of DNA damage response signaling from DNA damages underlies temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells. Journal of biomedical research. 2010 Nov. 23554659
  17. [17] Wong CE, Chang Y et al.. Dendritic cell vaccine for glioblastoma: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2024 Nov. 39167243
  18. [18] Moody CL, Wheelhouse RT. The medicinal chemistry of imidazotetrazine prodrugs. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland). 2014 Jul 10. 25014631
  19. [19] Regev O, Merkin V et al.. Tumor-Treating Fields for the treatment of glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro-oncology practice. 2021 Aug. 34277021
  20. [20] Haque W, Thong E et al.. Prognostic and predictive impact of MGMT promoter methylation in grade 3 gliomas. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2021 Mar. 33581781

Contact Us

📍

Address

One Research Ct, Suite 450
Rockville, MD 20850

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts