Allergan HA Signals in GLP-1 Faces Impress but Lack Controls for Expansion
Clinical Trial Updates

Allergan HA Signals in GLP-1 Faces Impress but Lack Controls for Expansion

Published : 10 Nov 2026

The Overview
Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie company, announced positive results from two Phase 4 studies, HARMONY IN DIVERSITY and HALO, evaluating aesthetic treatments in adults on GLP-1 medications. The HARMONY IN DIVERSITY study, combining HA injectables, onabotulinumtoxinA, and skincare, showed a statistically significant 42.4-point improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance at 30 days in 30 participants. Interim results from the HALO study, using HA injectables in 25 participants, demonstrated a 39.6-point mean improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance at month 3, with 95.7% satisfied they still looked like themselves. These findings, presented at ASDS 2026, address facial changes experienced by GLP-1 users.
Knolens Analysis

Allergan Aesthetics Phase 4 readout offers directionally encouraging but pivotal-weight deficient evidence in GLP-1 associated facial change. [1] HARMONY IN DIVERSITY reported a statistically significant 42.4-point improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance at 30 days in 30 participants on a triple regimen of HA injectables plus onabotulinumtoxinA plus skincare, while interim HALO reported a 39.6-point mean improvement at month 3 in 25 participants on HA injectables alone with 95.7% satisfied they still looked like themselves, presented at ASDS 2026. Contextual coherence comes from two mechanistically matched GLP-1 peers: a 2025 multicenter open-label study in 41 subjects with cheek wrinkles and midface deficiency after GLP-1 RA weight loss using PLLA-SCA plus HA-LYF or HA-CON through 9 months, and a Latin American real-world case series in 15 women with 17.9% weight reduction showing FLRS 4.5 to 2.6 and WSRS 3.1 to 1.9 at D90. [1] Market pull is visible in a 406-HCP survey reporting 137% growth in GLP-1 patient flow and HA preferred for 47% of facial concerns, supporting self-pay adoption but no HTA or ICER case. [2] No closely comparable regulatory precedent exists for GLP-1 facial change, so this package supports promotion and protocol development, not label expansion, with safety in co-medicated patients still uncharacterized given a late edema report with Ozempic co-use. [1]

42.4-point and 39.6-point FACE-Q gains rest on n=30 and n=25 interim single-arm Phase 4 data with no comparator and confounded triple therapy.

At a Glance
IndicationAesthetic improvement for facial changes due to GLP-1 medication use
DrugonabotulinumtoxinA and Hyaluronic Acid injectables
Mechanism of ActionNeurotoxin, Dermal Filler
CompanyAllergan Aesthetics
Trial PhasePhase 4
Trial AcronymHARMONY IN DIVERSITY, HALO
CategoryClinical Trial Event
Sub CategoryTopline Results Positive
Therapeutic AreaOthers
Patient PopulationAdults on GLP-1 medications
Study DesignProspective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm
HARMONY IN DIVERSITY Participants30
HALO Interim Participants25
Primary Outcome MeasureFACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance
HARMONY IN DIVERSITY Mean Improvement42.4 points
HALO Mean Improvement39.6 points
Conference Name2026 American Society for Dermatologic Surgery (ASDS) Annual Meeting
Presentation DatesNov. 5-8, 2026
Parent CompanyAbbVie

Allergan Aesthetics Reports Positive Phase 4 Results for GLP-1 Patients

Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie company, announced positive results from two Phase 4 studies, HARMONY IN DIVERSITY and HALO, evaluating aesthetic treatments in adults on GLP-1 medications. The HARMONY IN DIVERSITY study, combining HA injectables, onabotulinumtoxinA, and skincare, showed a statistically significant 42.4-point improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance at 30 days in 30 participants. Interim results from the HALO study, using HA injectables in 25 participants, demonstrated a 39.6-point mean improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance at month 3, with 95.7% satisfied they still looked like themselves. These findings, presented at ASDS 2026, address facial changes experienced by GLP-1 users.

  • The HARMONY IN DIVERSITY (Cohort 2) study, involving 30 adults on GLP-1 medications, demonstrated significant aesthetic and psychosocial benefits. Participants treated with HA injectables, onabotulinumtoxinA, and a skincare regimen reported a 42.4-point mean improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance, along with statistically significant improvements in skin quality, psychological function, and social function. Most treatment-related adverse events were mild and nonserious.
  • The HALO study's interim analysis of 25 GLP-1 patients treated with HA injectables across the face showed high patient satisfaction. Participants experienced a 39.6-point mean improvement in FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance from before treatment to month 3. Notably, 95.7% were satisfied or very satisfied that they still looked like themselves, and 82.6% were satisfied with how natural they looked.
  • These studies specifically target facial changes, such as volume loss and altered skin quality, experienced by individuals using GLP-1 medications for weight loss. The data provide crucial evidence for healthcare providers to develop informed treatment plans, helping patients manage their self-image and social engagement, and highlighting the importance of tailored aesthetic approaches for this growing patient population.

Addressing Facial Changes in the GLP-1 Patient Population

GLP-1 receptor agonists such as semaglutide and tirzepatide have expanded beyond type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity into off-label use for esthetic weight reduction, driving a growing population presenting with facial volume loss, skin laxity and prematurely aged appearance termed "Ozempic face." Quantitative and observational data from 2023 to 2026 characterize this as loss of midfacial volume, dermal thinning, loss of collagen and elastin fibers, decreased skin elasticity, redundant skin folds and pronounced wrinkles.

  • Affected patient population: Adults receiving glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists including semaglutide, liraglutide and tirzepatide for diabetes and obesity management and for off-label esthetic weight reduction, including patients studied with median age of 54 years (interquartile range [IQR] 48-61), case series aged 27-65 years, and adults aged 30-50 with BMI >30 kg/m; risk factors for more severe dermatological outcomes included advanced age, prolonged obesity history, rapid weight loss, poor hydration, and insufficient protein intake.

  • Facial burden targeted for correction: Prematurely aged and fatigued facial appearance due to rapid weight loss with depletion of facial volume and fat resulting in wrinkles and sagging skin; median percent decrease in total midfacial volume was 9.0% (IQR 3%-14%), superficial volume decreased by 11.0% (IQR 5%-15%), and deep volume decreased by 7.0% (IQR -20% to 15%), with loss of 7% facial volume for every 10 kg of weight lost primarily in superficial fat pads.

  • Lack of standardized management pathways: Gaps in empirical data, optimal timing for interventions, and standardized guidelines for treating this unique patient population, with systematic studies on the effectiveness and safety of corrective treatment lacking and prospective clinical validation still required.

  • Need for defined mechanistic and personalized strategies: Further studies needed to understand molecular mechanisms of skin and fat changes including collagen degradation, fat loss, skin elasticity, dermal structure alterations, adipose compartment loss, and fat distribution over time, and to develop personalized, multimodal treatment strategies combining injectable treatments, energy-based devices, and surgical interventions with imaging tools and psychological support; findings revealed a 40% increase in filler consultations attributed to GLP-1-related aesthetic concerns.

HARMONY IN DIVERSITY and HALO: Designing for GLP-1 Aesthetic Needs

This regimen was evaluated in a multicenter, open-label study in subjects with cheek wrinkles and midface contour deficiencies following GLP-1 RA-driven weight loss. Subjects received sequential poly-L-lactic acid and hyaluronic acid midface fillers to restore facial balance, correct contour deficiencies, and improve skin quality.

Study design Population Treatment regimen Follow-up Efficacy endpoints Safety monitoring
Multicenter, open-label study of PLLA-SCA and 2 hyaluronic acid midface fillers (HA-LYF, HA-CON) 41 subjects with cheek wrinkles and midface contour deficiencies following GLP-1 RA-driven weight loss 2 to 3 treatment sessions of PLLA-SCA and 1 to 2 treatment sessions of HA-LYF or HA-CON Through 9 months since the last PLLA-SCA treatment Objective skin quality assessments using bioinstrumentation; improvements in facial contour deficiencies using standardized photography; subject self-assessment questionnaires; significant improvement in facial skin quality and enhanced contour in the cheek, jawline, and perioral areas with objective improvement in hydration and skin radiance and subject satisfaction with treatment results Safety monitored throughout the study with no treatment-related adverse events reported

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the common facial aesthetic changes observed in patients undergoing GLP-1 agonist therapy?
GLP-1 agonist-induced weight loss can lead to significant reductions in subcutaneous fat, including in the face. This often results in a gaunt or hollowed appearance, sometimes referred to as 'Ozempic face.' Common manifestations include increased skin laxity, accentuation of fine lines and wrinkles, and volume loss in areas like the cheeks and temples. These changes can prematurely age the facial appearance.
How does onabotulinumtoxinA contribute to aesthetic improvement for facial changes linked to GLP-1 agonist use?
OnabotulinumtoxinA primarily addresses dynamic wrinkles and lines that become more prominent with significant weight loss and reduced facial volume. By temporarily relaxing specific facial muscles, it can smooth expression lines such as crow's feet, forehead lines, and glabellar frown lines. This helps to create a more refreshed and less aged appearance, complementing volume restoration efforts.
What is the role of Hyaluronic Acid dermal fillers in addressing facial volume depletion associated with GLP-1 agonist-induced weight loss?
Hyaluronic Acid dermal fillers are crucial for restoring lost facial volume, which is a primary consequence of rapid weight loss from GLP-1 agonists. These fillers can replenish volume in areas like the mid-face, temples, and jawline, mitigating the hollowed or sunken appearance. By providing structural support and hydration, they help to re-establish youthful contours and improve overall facial harmony.
What are the clinical considerations for a combined approach using onabotulinumtoxinA and Hyaluronic Acid fillers for GLP-1 related facial aesthetic concerns?
A combined approach leverages the distinct mechanisms of action of both injectables to achieve comprehensive facial rejuvenation. OnabotulinumtoxinA targets muscle-related wrinkles, while HA fillers restore volume and improve skin quality. Strategic placement of both agents allows for a tailored treatment plan that addresses multiple aspects of facial aging exacerbated by GLP-1 induced weight loss, optimizing aesthetic outcomes.

References

  1. [1] Wu X, Cen Q et al.. Microneedling Radiofrequency Enhances Poly-L-Lactic Acid Penetration That Effectively Improves Facial Skin Laxity without Lipolysis. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2024 Dec 1. 38051121
  2. [2] Cao Z, Li H et al.. High-Density Fat Grafting Assisted Stromal Vascular Fraction Gel in Facial Deformities. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2022 Jan-Feb 01. 34519702
  3. [3] Sharma RK, Vittetoe KL et al.. Radiographic Midfacial Volume Changes in Patients on GLP-1 Agonists. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 2025 Aug. 40407186
  4. [4] De Boulle K. Management of complications after implantation of fillers. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2004 Jan. 17163941
  5. [5] Fakih-Gomez N, Kadouch J et al.. Forehead Volumization and Rejuvenation with Hybrid Fillers. Aesthetic plastic surgery. 2026 Feb. 41225220
  6. [6] Carboni A, Woessner S et al.. Natural Weight Loss or "Ozempic Face": Demystifying A Social Media Phenomenon. Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD. 2024 Jan 1. 38206146
  7. [7] Seidel DU, Bode S. [Rapid weight loss through GLP-1 receptor agonists as lifestyle phenomenon and implications for plastic esthetic medicine]. HNO. 2025 Nov. 40767957
  8. [8] Adamidis N, Adamidi S et al.. Cellulite as a Possible Biomarker of Metabolic Dysfunction: Redefining Body Remodeling in the Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Era Through the Cellulite Removal Medical Protocol-G21 Concept. Cureus. 2026 Jun. 42453843
  9. [9] Rahman E, Webb WR et al.. Disruptions in Aesthetic Medicine: A Global Analysis of GLP-1 Agonists Using Punctuated Equilibrium Framework. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2026 Jan 1. 40690352
  10. [10] Christen MO. Collagen Stimulators in Body Applications: A Review Focused on Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA). Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2022. 35761856
  11. [11] Hoffmann K. Volumizing effects of a smooth, highly cohesive, viscous 20-mg/mL hyaluronic acid volumizing filler: prospective European study. BMC dermatology. 2009 Aug 27. 19712480
  12. [12] Narla S, Narla RR. Integrating glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists into dermatology practice: Safety and monitoring strategies. Clinics in dermatology. 2026 Aug 6. 42562129
  13. [13] Kollipara R, Hoss E et al.. A Randomized, Split-Body, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Poly-L-lactic Acid for the Treatment of Upper Knee Skin Laxity. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2020 Dec. 32852426
  14. [14] Gavard Molliard S, Albert S et al.. Key importance of compression properties in the biophysical characteristics of hyaluronic acid soft-tissue fillers. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2016 Aug. 27093589
  15. [15] Tanaka Y, Tsunemi Y et al.. Objective assessment of skin tightening in Asians using a water-filtered near-infrared (1,000-1,800 nm) device with contact-cooling and freezer-stored gel. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology. 2013. 23837000
  16. [16] Lorenc ZP, Somenek M et al.. A Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Combined Poly-L-Lactic Acid and Hyaluronic Midface Filler Regimen Enhances Facial Harmony and Skin Quality in GLP-1 Medication Users. Aesthetic surgery journal. 2026 Apr 7. 41243519
  17. [17] Bucky LP, Kanchwala SK. The role of autologous fat and alternative fillers in the aging face. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2007 Nov. 18090347
  18. [18] Leguina-Ruzzi A, Navarro A et al.. Efficacy and Effectiveness of High Molecular Weight Non-Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Plus Succinic Acid Mesotherapy in Rosacea as Adjunct Therapy. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2025 Oct. 41039794

Contact Us

📍

Address

350 Springfield Avenue,
Suite #200 Summit, NJ 07901

✉️

For General Inquiry

info@pienomial.com

Related Posts